WHO estimate on air pollution shows Indian cities are death traps

Analysis of database indicates that all 124 Indian cities assessed exceed the WHO guideline for particulate matter levels; Delhi, Patna exceed safe level prescribed by WHO by 15 times

By Vivek Chattopadhyay
Last Updated: Monday 17 August 2015

The latest urban air quality database released by WHO reconfirms what we already know—that most Indian cities are becoming death traps because of very high air pollution levels. India appears among the group of countries with highest particulate matter (PM) levels. Also, its cities have highest levels of PM10 and PM2.5 (particles with diameter of 10 microns and 2.5 microns) when compared to other cities.

WHO’s urban air quality database covers 1,600 cities across 91 countries.

The database shows Pakistan has the highest PM2.5 level of 101 microgramme/cubic metre (µg/cum), followed by Qatar, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Egypt, Mongolia, United Arab Emirates (range of 92 to 61 µg/cum) and India with 59 µg/cum. These countries have PM2.5 levels that exceed safe levels prescribed by WHO by 6 to 10 times.

This database confirms our worst fears about how hazardous air pollution is in our region. Last year, the “Global Burden of Disease” study pinned outdoor air pollution as fifth largest killer in India  after high blood pressure, indoor air pollution, tobacco smoking, and poor nutrition; about 620,000 early deaths occurred in India from air pollution-related diseases in 2010.

Read more on deaths attributed to air pollution

The PM10 and PM2.5 database released by WHO contains data of 124 Indian cities. Analysis of this database indicates that all Indian cities exceed the WHO guideline of 20 µg/cum for PM10, in case of PM2.5 except one city (Pathanamthitta in Kerala is at the WHO guideline limit of 10), all exceed the WHO guideline of 10 µg/cum.

The PM2.5 levels are worst in Delhi and Patna, exceeding the WHO guideline by about 15 times, followed by Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow and Ferozabad, all exceeding the safe levels by 9 to14 times. Cities such as Kanpur, Amritsar, Ludhiana, Allahabad, Agra, Jodhpur, Dehradun and Chandrapur closely follow the above-mentioned hot spots.

Lax standards

What also becomes clear is how weak are our National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in protecting public health. If we consider our NAAQS as a yardstick to compare the air quality in our cities—then 60 cities would meet the PM2.5 standard, and 21 cities, PM10. This is because the Indian NAAQS are three to four times lax compared to WHO guidelines. Indian NAAQS for PM10 is 60 µg/cum, and for PM2.5 it is 40 µg/cum, whereas the WHO guidelines for PM10 is 20 µg/cum and for PM2.5, it is 10 µg/cum. Imagine how unsafe it is to breathe even if we meet our national standards.

Worldwide trends

WHO says that air quality in most cities worldwide that monitor outdoor (ambient) air pollution fail to meet WHO guidelines for safe levels, putting people at additional risk of respiratory disease and other health problems. “Too many urban centres today are so enveloped in dirty air that their skylines are invisible,” said Flavia Bustreo, WHO assistant director-general for family, children and women's health, in a release.

In April 2014, WHO issued new information estimating that outdoor air pollution was responsible for the deaths of some 3.7 million people under the age of 60 in 2012. The organisation also emphasised that indoor and outdoor air pollution, combined, are among the largest risks to health worldwide. Measurement of fine particulate matter of 2.5 micrometre or less in diameter (PM2.5) is considered to be the key indicator of the level of health risks from air pollution.

On the contrary to rising risks, worldwide, compliance to guidelines is marginal. Only 12 per cent of the people living in cities (1,600 total cities assessed) reside in cities where air quality complies with WHO Air Quality Guideline levels. About half of the urban population being monitored is exposed to air pollution that is at least 2.5 times higher than the levels. WHO recommends putting those people at additional risk of serious, long-term health problems.

Air pollution levels are worsening, WHO says "In most cities where there is enough data to compare the situation today with previous years, air pollution is getting worse." And, among the factors responisble are "increase in reliance on fossil fuels such as coal fired power plants, dependence on private transport motor vehicles, inefficient use of energy in buildings, and the use of biomass for cooking and heating."

Effective policies and strategies are well understood, but they need to be implemented at sufficient scale. The report notes that individual cities can take local action to improve air quality and thus go against regional trends. And good air quality can go hand in hand with economic development, as indicated by some major cities in Latin America which meet, or approach, the WHO Air Quality Guidelines. Despite the upswing in air quality monitoring, many cities in low- and middle-income countries still lack capacity to do so. There is a particular shortage of data in WHO’s Africa and Eastern Mediterranean regions.

Therefore, we can say it is so far, an underestimation of the risks – and the health outcome numbers could be much bigger, as millions of people are out of the monitoring grid. The nations while expanding the monitoring network must also set up systems for alert people about air pollution and health outcomes, which make people realize what they are breathing in, and demand clean air, to set in motion the much needed action.

WHO Study: Ambient (outdoor) air pollution in cities database 2014

Report: Burden of disease from household and ambient air pollution for 2012

Guidelines: CPCB Guidelines for the measurement of ambient air pollutants

Report: National ambient air quality status & trends in India 2010

Report: Urban air pollution and co-benefits analysis for Indian cities

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Alarming. Dr.A.Jagadeesh

    Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • Being unfamiliar with Indian

    Being unfamiliar with Indian many questions arise.

    Are ther any targets in the current five year plan for eliminating air water and soil poisoning and pollution? Eliminating the mining and use of nuclear and fossil fuels?
    Are any of the political groups now contending for government office espousing any targets in this regard, in boosting renewable energy production, production and use of hydrogen-electric hybrid vehicles for road rail air and sea transportation, mass transit vehicles?

    Have the candidates now contending for government office been asked to clarify their position in this regard and are those published on any web site?

    Is there a national environmental protection agency and groups lobbying for environment protection and amelioration and also importantly improving and maintaining the publics visual environment?

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • I would like know : (1) How

    I would like know :

    (1) How China and other Western cities are managing with air pollution

    (2) Is is possible to disperse / clean / dilute/ precipitate / dissolve etc. the pollutants by physical or chemical or some such methods ?

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • Dear Anop, Measures such as

    Dear Anop,
    Measures such as dispersion, cleaning, dilution could be effective in enclosed/ indoor environments or in industries but at the city level, plans and policies are implemented which can result in improvement of ambient air quality for the entire city. Cutting down emissions at the level of sources is an effective strategy to improve the air quality which also reduces public exposure to toxic emissions.

    Globally, many cities which are facing air pollution problem, are implementing action plans that include both short-term and long-term measures to reduce emissions from vehicles, industries, and other sources. Since vehicles cause emissions at the breathing level, the action strategies include reducing their numbers also.

    In China, cities such as Shanghai, Beijing, and Guangzhou have capped the number of cars that can be sold in a year to control car ownership growth. Cities have also raised parking fee, augmented public transport, and introduced subsidy policy for scrappage of older vehicles. Beijing has set tighter fuel quality and emission norms (Euro V norms for buses and municipal fleet) and is promoting alternative fuelled vehicles. During smog episodes, the contingency plan requires taking off cars from road (80% government-owned cars; private cars allowed on alternate days according to numbers plates); barring heavy-duty vehicles; polluting factories are required to cut emissions or shut down in case of severe pollution; among other things.

    In western countries the strategies also include the above elements. In a recent smog episode in Paris, car usage were curbed and public transport was made free to persuade people to leave their vehicles to reduce vehicular pollution. In addition, public bicycle sharing services were provided for free. In other places, such as Athens, Sao Paulo, London, Singapore traffic reduction policies are in place, cities such as Berlin restrict the cars with certain emissions levels to enter the city.

    As a long-term effective reduction in emissions, use of cleaner fuels and vehicles is a must. Many cities in western world, also in Asia are setting tighter fuel quality norms that reduce sulfur, aromatic content and other toxic compounds from fuels. Improved fuels enable use of low-emitting vehicle technology which in effect cuts down PM. CO, HC, NOx emissions.

    Europe, Japan and USA have introduced near-zero sulfur target for diesel and petrol fuels (10/15 ppm sulfur). India follows European emission norms for vehicles but lags behind Europe by almost a decade. Europe is switching to Euro 6 norms this year, but in India only about 38 cities follow Euro 4 equivalent norms and rest of the nation is at Euro 3 stage. In Europe the diesel cars are required to be fitted with devices which trap the emitted particulate matter.

    Therefore, we need to prepare and implement time-bound action plans with emission reduction targets from different sources to meet the air quality standards in cities.

    Posted by: Vivek Chattopadhyay | 4 years ago | Reply
  • Can we not try and pass a

    Can we not try and pass a policy on fixing electrostatic precipitators on every chimney??? Or atleast plant more trees with a goal of 60% forest cover in every state??? We could get school kids and companies to do it individually...celebrate a day especially for this every year...a national day just to plant trees! we currently stand at 23%, set a vision to increase push this to 60% nationally! its not impossible..might take ten years...but what WILL happen is definite reduction in extreme climate change which we are witnessing already! the countries that have lesser air quality issues have more trees! its simple! Lets do this!

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply