Farmers in general satisfied with return from local sale, but a significant percentage of them get lower than market price
The majority of Indian farmers sell their produce in local markets, the 77th round of the National Sample Survey by the National Statistical Office titled Land and livestock holdings of households and situation assessment of agricultural households has found. Government agencies and Agricultural Produce Market Committees account for an insignificant portion of farmers’ produce sales.
For the 18 types of crops, including paddy, wheat and arhar covered under the survey, farmers sold 55-93 per cent of their produce in local markets. In APMC markets, it ranged from 3-22 per cent; while government procurement accounted for 2-14 per cent. Farmers preferring to sell in local markets are the trend across crops.
For instance, in the case of paddy, farmers sold 75.1 per cent of their produce in local markets. Government agencies and APMC markets accounted for 10.5 per cent of their sold produce. In the case of wheat, farmers sold 66 per cent of their produce in local markets while APMC and government procurement took up 26 per cent of wheat produce.
Among the crops that farmers sold to APMC markets and government agencies, paddy, wheat and sugarcane had the highest share. This is due to the fact that these crops have minimum support price coverage and have established procurement channels.
In the case of pulses, farmers mostly sell in local markets. Farmers sold 68 per cent of their arhar (red gram) in local markets and 22 per cent in APMC markets. Government agencies accounted for just 1.7 per cent of the farmers’ sales.
In case of moong (split green gram), farmers sold 93 per cent of their produce in local markets while APMC and government agencies picked up nearly five per cent.
Are farmers satisfied with sales outcomes? This is a question the NSO survey also explored. Its results show that the majority of farmers are ‘satisfied’ with the sales outcome or which can be interpreted as the return from their produce.
For instance, take paddy. Nearly 59 per cent of farmers were satisfied with the sales outcome; for wheat, this was 66.2 per cent.
But for pulses, the sales outcome’s satisfactory level is lower in comparison to other crops. For urad (black gram), only 40 per cent farmers were satisfied with the sales outcome. For arhar, nearly 51 per cent of farmers were satisfied.
The satisfaction level leaves out a significant percentage of farmers not happy with the sales outcomes. For example, in the case of paddy, 41 per cent farmers were not satisfied with the sales outcomes. What are the reasons for this dissatisfaction?
The survey has listed five reasons for dissatisfaction among farmers: ‘lower than market price’; ‘delayed payment’; ‘deduction for loans borrowed’; ‘faulty weighing and grading’ and ‘others’.
Among these reasons, ‘lower than market price’ is the overwhelming reason for farmers not being satisfied with their sale outcomes. In the case of paddy, 37.1 per cent farmers cited this as the reason for ‘not satisfied’ with sales outcome.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.