Twenty-nine workers were killed in a landslide at the Tehri dam. The contractor building the dam has blamed the "weak mountains" for the incident. Many experts agree that the mountains of the region are fragile. The dam will have a huge reservoir that would only increase the risk of a breach, which could trigger a calamity. Further, the controversial dam is being built in an earthquake-prone region.
Was the incident a tragedy foreseen? KUSHAL P S YADAV reports from Tehri. Photographs by SURYA SEN
A dark tunnel
Since Tehri is in an earthquake-prone region, so the authorities had settled on an earth and rockfill dam and not on a concrete dam.
At the time of the incident, concreting work was going on in T3 to strengthen the tunnel. In the ILO, workers were involved in digging and excavating activities (see: Buried alive).
Officials of the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC), which is supervising the work on the Tehri dam project, refused to comment on the exact cause of the tragic incident. But J P Gaur, head of Jai Prakash Industries, the contractors responsible for constructing the dam structure, said, "The dam is strong but inherently the mountains are weak." The comment begs the question: was such a tragedy foreseen? And if so, what steps had been taken to protect the lives of the workers from the "inherent" risk?
According to P C Nawani, head of the Geological Survey of India (GSI), the landslide could be a result of incessant rains and the consequent seepage of water into the rocks. Nawani, who visited the site two days after the tragedy, told journalists that the work on the area from which the landslide occurred should have been finished before the rains, which begin in June. Other experts who visited the dam site also said rain and the weak mountains led to the incident. Some officials have pointed out that the portion of the hill from which the landslide took place should have been properly lined with microsilica to strengthen it. J P Industries officials say that they had ordered a consignment of microsilica, which is imported, but its delivery was delayed "due to some reasons."
But who will bear the responsibility for the incident? Says R D Prabhakar, executive director, THDC, "It is everyone's responsibility. We are the supervisors, it is their (J P Industries) responsibility also." Gaur announced that the weak mountains would be fortified. However, no one is clear as to how all the mountains surrounding this huge reservoir can be strengthened. Once completed, the 260.5 metre high dam will store 3500 million cubic metres of water in a reservoir that will extend 45 kilometres upstream in the Bhagirathi valley and 25 kilometres upstream in the Bhilangana valley.
Various reasons are being given for the mishap. One of them is that the work in the shaft was being done at a level lower than that of the water already in the reservoir. Most of the workers were engaged at levels between 618 and 670 metre elevations above sea level, while the water in the reservoir stood at about 648 metres. Some people say the pressure of the reservoir water coupled with seepage could have led to the landslide.
Meanwhile, the police have registered a case against J P Industries. "We registered a case under the section 304 (a) against the company (J P Industries). Basically this section covers offences involving carelessness endangering human lives. As far as the case is concerned the investigations will be on," says V Murugesan, superintendent of police, Tehri.
Union power minister P M Sayeed visited the dam site on August 4 and announced the setting up of a three-member technical committee to investigate the matter. M S Reddy, former secretary, Union ministry of water resources, will head the committee. "The recommendations are will be fully implemented," says Sayeed (see interview: Status quo). Chief minister of Uttaranchal, N D Tiwari, also visited the site on the same day and ordered a non-technical magisterial enquiry into the matter (see interview: "In the future no such big dams should come up in Uttaranchal").
The committee set up by the power minister will hand over its report in due course. But whatever this committee finds on the causes of the tunnel disaster, it is clear that this incident has once again raised questions about the safety of the dam located in the young, fragile and highly seismic Himalaya.
But the inhabitants see this incident as a curse for the submergence of the old Tehri town. The town is located at the confluence of rivers Bhagirathi and Bhilangana, just a few hundred metres upstream of the Tehri dam. On July 29, the water level in the reservoir went up by about 7 metres to 655 metres. This caused submergence of various parts of the old Tehri town. But some people were still present in their homes when the water entered the town and had to flee to save their lives (see: Deluge). The water level has now receded to the earlier 648 metre mark and in the ghost town of old Tehri, these people were seen by Down To Earth hunting for the little they could retrieve.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.