Forests

Dousing flames

The Uttarakhand forest fires that lasted for over 100 days should come as a warning to the rest of India since half of its forests are vulnerable to fire

 
Uttarakhand
government has
already spent over
Rs 85 lakh on water used
by choppers to control
forest fires in the state
Uttarakhand
government has
already spent over
Rs 85 lakh on water used
by choppers to control
forest fires in the state Uttarakhand government has already spent over Rs 85 lakh on water used by choppers to control forest fires in the state

On the evening of April 27, Digamber was startled by his mother’s panic-stricken voice at his home in Saru village of Pauri Garhwal district of Uttarakhand. “There is a fire in our forest,” she screamed. Digamber and his wife, Urmila, came out of the house and saw the entire pine forest burning. Within minutes, the fire reached their hay stacks, kept since November last year for feeding their three cows. “We ran to save the hay stacks from fire. I had asked Urmila not to go towards the fire but she did not listen. Seconds later, her clothes were in flames. I could do nothing to save her,” says Digamber, his voice almost inaudible.


Urmila was rushed to the district hospital at Pauri Garhwal where, looking at the seriousness of the burns, she was referred to the base hospital of the district. At the emergency ward of base hospital, Digamber was told his wife had suffered nearly 90 per cent burn injuries. A day later, he took Urmila to the Safdarjung Hospital in New Delhi, where the doctors declared her dead.

Urmila is one of the seven people who have died so far in the Uttarakhand forest fires, which have been burning for more than 100 days. The fire that was first reported on February 2 has already engulfed all the 13 districts of the state. The worst-hit districts are Pauri, Nainital, Rudraprayag, Chamoli, Almora and Uttarkashi where forests neighbouring 1,500 villages are under fire. Forest fires are a regular feature at this time of the year in the state, but this year, say village residents, the trees are burning as if apocalypse is near. Till May 7, over 1,828 incidents of forest fire in the state had affected 4,015 hectares (ha), of which 102 ha are plantations. State forest department puts the monetary loss at a little over of Rs 35 lakh.

Environmentalists say the real loss of the fires will be the damage done to the ecology, something that the forest department does not track. Uttarakhand forests are home to a significant population of insects and mammals such as tiger, sambar, muntjac, leopard, common langur and the yellow-throated marten. “This is the breeding season of birds. Thousands of birds’ eggs were destroyed in the fire. It is not possible to measure the loss of such diverse fauna, but for certain, some species of birds, insects, butterflies, could be wiped out from the jungles,” says Diwan Nagarkoti, an environmental educationist from Almora.

Intense politicking is choking forestry of funds
 
Severe damage may not be repairable, but can be avoided

Though an annual spectacle, forest fires can't be ignored. This year, the fires are severe because of multiple factors. Other than the scorching heat, there was negligence on the part of government agencies and apathy on the part of the local people. Fires are lit by people for a variety of reasons, but fires become rampant when the fuel load is not removed and fire lines are not cleaned.

The focus should be on preventing the fire from spreading. Local people should be involved. A long-term measure can be an annual fire management plan prepared with maps of vulnerable areas and an early warning system in tandem with the Forest Survey of India. The plan should be ready by December. A control room should also be established by December, through June. Incidentally, I suggested these provisions in the 2001 guidelines and in the integrated forest protection scheme with emphasis on Joint Forest Management (JFM) engagement.

During my last visit to Uttarakhand, I was told by the state president of the van panchayat, N S Tomar, that funds from the state were not made available to maintain the fire lines. Even the top brass has no seriousness about utilising funds from sources such as the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA). Due to intense politicking in the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, the forestry sector is choked of funds. On the other hand, CAMPA has funds in excess of Rs 40,000 crore. Joint Forests Management Committees (JFMCS) have an important role in controlling these fires. It is essential to sign a memorandum of understanding with JFMCS and pay them 50 per cent of the expenses to control fire lines before the start of the fire season and the remaining at the end. District forest officers should be made responsible.

The writer was part of India's first committee on forest fire management and is retired Director General, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education

Bhawani Prakash Gupta, chief conservator of forest, Uttarakhand, says the forest department’s priority is “to save the forests and human habitation areas”. “As far as wildlife is concerned, the four-legged animals run towards habitation to escape the forest fire. Birds too find their safety spots. But for nests and other kinds of fauna, we have no method or policy to save them.” He adds that they have recently doubled the number of firefighters in the state to 6,000 on the direction of the state Governor. “A total of 11,773 people including firewatchers, forest department staff, police, NDRF (National Disaster Relief Force), fire officers and SDRF (State Disaster Relief Force) team were employed to douse the enormous forest fire that has nearly ravaged the state.” Two Indian Air Force choppers, each with a capacity of 3,000 litres of water, were also pressed into service in Garhwal and Kumaon regions. He adds that till May 4, the state had spent Rs 50 lakh on the water that the two choppers dropped.

But 61-year-old Kundan Singh, a resident of Hariyal village in Nainital district, says the state is wasting money because the firefighting teams “do not know how to control fires”. Despite having forest fires every year, Uttarakhand does not have a uniform plan. Each district decides its own fire plan on the basis of common guidelines stated by the department. The district fire plan is decided in a meeting held between December and February every year. The meeting is headed by the district magistrate and attended by state and district forest officials, police, fire officers and disaster management officers.

On April 27, Digamber
lost his wife to a forest
fire in his village in
Pauri Garhwal district
of Uttarakhand. The
charred slipper and
a photograph are the
only memories of his
wife now (Photographs: Vikas Choudhary)

Forest officials say the guidelines are hardly ever met because of paucity of funds. “Whether district-level fire plans work or not depends on funds. If there are insufficient funds, we are unable to put the plan into action,” says Prem Kumar, conservator of forests, North Kumaon. The budget is decided according to the fire plan. The funds are released in two parts: once in November-December for preparation, and then in April-May when forest fires peak in the state. The state government has released Rs 21.75 crore between April and May this year.

Officials say delays in the release of funds are a regular feature, which hampers fire-control. For example, a delay in the releasing of funds during November-December means sufficient number of fire lines are not set up. Fire lines are wide clearings, ranging from 20 to 300 m, made in a forest to stop the spread of fire. Delays mean these lines are filled with dry leaves and twigs, and as a result help in the spreading of fire.

While admitting to the delays, Gupta says it does not hamper the execution of the plan. “Yes, there is a delay in the release of funds from the government. But the department continues the work according to the plan. The payment is compensated later.” Gupta’s explanation has few takers. Environmentalists say firewatchers and forest guards often do not receive payment because of the delay—a reason village residents are not interested in getting involved in fire prevention activities. “Firewatchers receive promotion when they near retirement, unlike other officials who are promoted regularly. Instead of hiring conservators, more forest guards and watchers should be employed,” says environmentalist Chandi Prasad Bhatt, who pioneered the Chipko movement in 1970s.

Forest fires and climate change
 
Black carbon released from forest fires can speed up melting of glaciers

The little known story of the raging forest fire in Uttarakhand hills, home to many Himalayan glaciers, is how it fouls up both lungs and climate. When forests burn, stored carbon is freed from these ecosystems which worsens warming. Forest fires emit a mix of organic material as well black carbon, or soot. Organic material scatters light and cools and black carbon absorbs light and heats up. But on snow and glaciers, both can absorb heat and speed up melting. In the air, black and brown carbon absorbs solar radiation and warms up the atmosphere, worsening snow melting and interfering with cloud and rainfall.

This is bad news when Himalayan forests are prone to wild fires. Though the numbers are uncertain, studies in the Himalayas show two-thirds of the Hindu Kush Himalayan and Tibetan glaciers are melting rapidly since 1950s. In addition to the CO2 led global warming, high solar heating by black carbon at an elevation of 2 to 5 km is as much as 25-50 per cent of the background solar heating. A 2010 study by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory with others shows that from 1990 to 2010, the snow/ice cover over the Himalayas decreased by about 0.9 per cent due to aerosols. Indian black carbon from a variety of sources is responsible for 30 per cent of this decline.

In 2009, the Union Ministry of Environment and Forest and Climate Change in its report on black carbon reviewed studies which found significant impacts of South Asia's black carbon emissions in the Mt Everest region. A significant increasing trend in the black carbon radiative forcing was noted since 1990. The report states that black carbon concentrations over the Himalayas and on glaciers cannot be neglected and has asked for its systematic investigation.

The author is Executive Director - Research and Advocacy, Centre for Science and Environment, Delhi

In fact, environmentalists say that though forest fires are a natural process, acute ones are often triggered by people, intentionally or due to negligence. “Even a burning matchstick can start a forest fire. In Uttarakhand, illegal timber trade and intentional and negligent lighting of fire are major reasons for fires,” says Bhatt. He adds that village residents often set fire to the forest floor of pine needles to get a good cover of grass the next year and to get rid of the slippery chir pine needles. He also points out that village residents, fire officials and traders often burn forest portions and smuggle wood. Between April 27 and May 7, 2016, 49 police cases have been lodged throughout the state for intentionally lighting a forest fire.

The weather also played its part in this year’s forest fire. The official forest fire season in the state is between February 15 and June 15, when the air is dry and warm. But this year, first forest fire incidents were registered on February 2. This year, Uttarakhand received scanty rains in December and January making it an abnormally warm winter. “Due to lack of rainfall in the winter months, there was no moisture in the air and soil, so the fires started early,” says P Soni, senior forest ecologist and former head of the division of Ecology and Environment at the Forest Research Institute (FRI), Dehradun.

Source: As told by Sunil Chandra,
scientist Forest Research Institute

The state had been registering deficit rainfall since May 2015, but the forest department failed to act on the warning. Government data suggests that except for June, all the months between May 2015 and February 2016 registered defecit rainfall. In January 2016, Uttarakhand received just 5.4mm of rain instead of the expected 52.1mm. In February, there was just 29.2mm of rain against the expected 54.1mm.

“We have to understand that we cannot stop forest fires, but we can successfully control the fire so that it does not wreck havoc. What we are seeing today is the result of years of negligence on the part of the (forest) department and village residents,” says Soni.

Large-scale migration from Uttarakhand hills in the last decade is also responsible for the magnitude of forest fires this year. Arvind Bijalwan from the Indian Institute of Forest management, Bhopal, and Manmohan J R Dobriyal from Navsari Agricultural University, Gujarat, say that earlier village residents used to collect the litter, including inflammable chir pine needle and oak, for bedding purpose of their domestic animals. This used to reduce fire hazardous material in forest areas. It was also easier to douse fires as there were more people in the area, they say. But most hill districts in the state have seen a reduction in population growth rates. For example, Pauri Gawhal has witnessed a 136 per cent decline in decadal population growth rates between 1991-2001 and 2001-2011.

Tree varieties in the forest aided the fire. The pine trees in the forests have resin and are highly flammable. Chir pine and banj oak trees dominate 24,240 sq km of forest in the state. Chir pine trees make up 16 per cent of the state’s total forest area, according to Uttarakhand Forest Statistics 2012-13. Environmentalist Radha Bhatt says that the British promoted the tree because the wood could be used to make train berths. The trees are still a big revenue generator for the state. In 2016, Uttarakhand sold 16.5 million kg of resin in a nationwide auction and earned over Rs 90 crore, which is close to five times what the state has so far spent on forest fires.

Gupta says that his department has floated an idea of cutting down pine trees that are found on altitudes above 1,000 metres. The felling of tress at high altitudes was banned by the Centre in 1980s. “We will approach the Supreme Court with our proposal, once it is approved by the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEF&CC),” says Gupta. Environmentalists, however, warn that the move will further damage the state’s ecology. “When India is fighting climate change, it is not wise to bring down thousands of chir pine trees. It is more advisable to introduce broad-leaved trees,” says Diwan Nagarkoti, an environmental educationist from Almora.

“Removal of pine will further degrade the ecological capacity of the forest to prevent loss of soil water,” says Niyati Naudiyal, a PhD student working on forest fires at the department of natural resources, TERI University, New Delhi. Naudiyal says pine is a hardy tree variety that normally survives forest fires. So, she suggests, if the state effectively controls forest fires, other tree varieties will grow in due time.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories
Related Gallery

India Environment Portal Resources :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.