Multiple gaps in implementation of crop insurance schemes may have compromised their purpose of benefitting farmers
The CAG audit report of the Centre’s crop insurance schemes has highlighted gaps in their implementation that compromise its purpose of providing financial assistance to farmers.
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) looked into the performance of two schemes—Modified National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (MNAIS) and the National Crop Insurance Programme (NCIP) —between Kharif season of 2011 to Rabi season of 2015-16. NDA government’s ambitious Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, which came into force in Kharif 2016, was not been scrutinised by the CAG.
The report suggested delay at the state level caused obstruction in providing financial aid to farmers. The report found that Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare (DAC&FW) under the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare released funds, but the delay took place at the state government level, it stated.
Protocol not followed
According to the report, the Agricultural Insurance Company of India Limited (AIC), the government-owned implementing agency for the schemes, “failed to exercise due diligence in verification of claims by private insurance companies before releasing funds to them.”
Between 2011 and 2016, the AIC released Rs 3,622 crore as premium subsidy to 10 private insurance companies without complying with government guidelines.
Analysis of data from the CAG report reveals that expenditure of the allotted money reduced between 2014-16, under the NDA government. While the amount allocated for crop insurance schemes went up from Rs.1,025 crores in 2011-12 to Rs. 3,185.09 crores in 2015-16, its expenditure plummeted from 102 per cent to 93 per cent in respective years.
Whether the money reached the beneficiaries cannot be ensured as the database of beneficiaries was not maintained.
“The Government of India and the state governments were not in a position to ensure that Rs 10,617.41 crores released as premium subsidy under National Agricultural Insurance Scheme, Modified National Agricultural Insurance Scheme and Weather-Based Crop Insurance Scheme and Rs 21,989.24 crore released as claim reimbursement under NAIS, during the period covered in audit, reached the intended beneficiaries or achieved the intended purposes,” the report stated.
Claims worth Rs 8,947.41 crores were paid in the nine audited states, but only 30 per cent of the amount had utilisation certificates (UC) to prove it reached farmers. The report observes, “Implementing agencies did not ensure submission of UCs by Bank/financial institutions and therefore, did not have even the minimum assurance from the Bank/FIs that they had distributed the claim amounts to beneficiary farmers.”
Small farmers not covered
Small and marginal farmers constitute 85 per cent (12 crores) of the total farmers (14 crores) in the country. Yet, their share in the coverage did not exceed 13.32 per cent under the NAIS scheme.
Coverage of non-loanee farmers under the crop insurance schemes has been particularly low. Non-loanee farmers are those who sign up for these schemes willingly, unlike their loanee counterparts, who are mandatorily enrolled. “Percentage of non-loanee farmers opting for MNAIS ranged from 0 per cent to 5 per cent and for WBCIS ranged from 1 per cent to 10 per cent of the total insured farmers,” the report states.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
India Environment Portal Resources :
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.