The report presents evidence collected and collated on aspects such as crop yield, cost of cultivation, income and livelihood, soil health and environment and food quality and nutrients
A new report by Delhi-based non-profit Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) released virtually February 2, 2022, has presented evidence that organic and natural farming is not only profitable and sustainable but also productive. It can propel India to invest more adequately to upscale and encourage such a mass movement.
CSE director-general, Sunita Narain said during the launch that despite the push given to it through periodic pronouncements from India’s leaders, the country’s efforts to upscale non-chemical farming practices have largely remained half-hearted at best.
“CSE’s new report on the subject presents robust evidence which makes it clear that we can upscale organic and natural farming. It is time to invest adequately in a well-funded nation-wide programme for this,” she added, according to a statement by CSE.
The report is titled Evidence (2004-20) on holistic benefits of organic and natural farming in India.
The report was released a day after Union finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman made a pitch for promoting chemical-free natural farming in the Union Budget 2022-23.
She also encouraged states to revise the syllabi in their agricultural universities, keeping in line with this new push.
“But, these are relatively small steps compared to the need of the hour and especially after the prime minister’s appeal in December to make natural farming a mass movement,” Amit Khurana, programme director, Sustainable Food Systems programme, CSE and co-author of the CSE report, said.
What the report presents
The report presents evidence collected and collated on aspects such as crop yield, cost of cultivation, income and livelihood, soil health and environment and food quality and nutrients.
It is based on two sets of sources:
The report makes a clear case to consider the holistic benefits of organic and natural farming, such as those related to livelihoods, soil health and environment (instead of only yield) in future policies and programmes.
It presents long-term evidence through the AI-NPOF results on how benefits of organic approach outweigh that of inorganic approach, with respect to profitability parameters such as net returns and soil health parameters like organic carbon, macronutrients, micronutrients, bulk density and rhizosphere microbial population.
The evidence collected by the report brought out some interesting details.
Of the 504 times that yield results were recorded during 2014-19, the yields were found to be highest 41 per cent of the times with organic approach, followed by 33 per cent with integrated and 26 per cent with inorganic approach.
Of 61 cropping systems, net returns have been seen to be the highest in 64 per cent with organic approach at 12 centres, 11 per cent with integrated approach at four centres and 25 per cent with inorganic approach at five centres.
The five-year mean net returns with organic approach are higher than inorganic in 67 per cent cropping systems.
Cropping systems with organic approach have scored the highest in terms of all the parametres on soil health — organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The report’s findings on soil bulk density, soil bacteria, fungi, micronutrients, etc also offer a similar verdict.
“It is surprising how the results of the government’s own All India Network Project on organic farming, which has been present in the public domain for the last several years, did not get the required attention. It is also a concern how the entire issue so far has focused on yields and not on livelihoods and soil health benefits,” Khurana said.
“It is evident that the organic approach has fared better than integrated on profitability and sustainability and is almost at par with it in the case of productivity,” Abhay Kumar Singh, programme manager, Sustainable Food Systems Programme in CSE and a co-author of the report, said.
Abdul Halim, his co-author and the Programme’s deputy manager, said: “There is proof that natural farming involves low costs and helps in introducing resilient crops, energy and water efficiency, plant and animal biodiversity, carbon sequestration and climate mitigation.”
The report recommends actions needed to upscale organic and natural farming.
These are building a well-funded ambitious programme, training and supporting farmers during transition, making available quality organic fertilisers and biofertilisers, enabling agriculture extension systems, farmer-friendly certification, enabling market access and action at the state level.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.