Agriculture

Official data exposes Centre’s inflated claims on success of agriculture insurance scheme

The number of non-loanee farmers opting for insurance reached 9.7 million in kharif season of 2016 as against 9.8 million in the same period in 2015  

 
By Jitendra
Last Updated: Friday 06 January 2017 | 05:05:29 AM
There is a compulsion for every loanee farmer to buy this insurance scheme and they are forced to pay premium. Credit: CIAT/ Flicker
There is a compulsion for every loanee farmer to buy this insurance scheme and they are forced to pay premium. Credit: CIAT/ Flicker There is a compulsion for every loanee farmer to buy this insurance scheme and they are forced to pay premium. Credit: CIAT/ Flicker

On December 7, the Union Ministry of Agriculture press release claimed that that the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) has made impressive progress in 2016. According to the press release, “There has been a quantum jump of more than six times in the coverage of non-loanee farmers, which shows that the scheme has been well received by the non-loanee segment.”

On contrary to the inflated claim of the Centre, the government data seen by the Down To Earth shows that the number of non-loanee farmers has in fact, reduced by one per cent. Interestingly, the number of insured loanee farmers has shot up by 28 per cent in comparison to 2015. But it must be noted that there is a compulsion for every loanee farmer to buy this insurance scheme and they are forced to pay premium. The premium amount is automatically deducted from their sanctioned loan amount. 

Farmers (in million)

2016 (kharif)

2015 (kharif)

% change

Loan

26.99

21.01

+28

Non-Loanee

9.77

9.84

- 1

Total

36.76

30.86

+19

Sources:  AICL, union ministry of agriculture and farmers welfare

The Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) was launched in January 2016 to provide relief to farmers in case of crop loss or damage due to unseasonal rainfall, hailstorm, drought and other natural calamities. The annual budgetary allocation was Rs 5,500 crore instead of required amount of about Rs 19,000 crore.

According to the government-owned Agriculture Insurance Company India Limited (AICL), which is engaged in implementation and providing data to the government, the number of non-loanee farmers opting for insurance reached 9.7 million in kharif season of 2016, whereas it was 9.8 million in the same period in 2015.

Like previous schemes, PMFBY, too, has not been well received by non-loanee farmers. Only those who are engaged in horticulture, voluntarily opt for insurance scheme. It is an indication the insurance scheme has not been able to generate any interest among farmers.

The senior officers, who closely monitored the scheme, are in a fix as they can neither reject nor accept its own data.

Is there a pressure on banks to cover more farmers under PMFBY?

Experts feel that this rise in number of farmers getting covered under PMFBY is due to the continuous pressure on banks and awareness drive. “The banks were under tremendous pressure to deduct premium from loan amount. Earlier, under local influence, banks would avoid deducting premium amount,” says a senior officer from the Ministry of Agriculture who doesn’t wish to be named.

In many areas, local farmer leaders protest over automatic deduction of premium amount from their sanctioned loan amount. It has long been a bone of contention that farmers do not get any benefit from agriculture insurance schemes.

Muzaffarnagar-based farmer leader Dharmendra Mallik of Bhartiya Kisan Union, who has campaigned against this scheme this year, too, says, “Like previous insurance schemes this, too, has not been helping farmers. Only name has changed instead of provisions.”

Down To Earth tried to reach out to the Union Minister of Agriculture and other officials at the the ministry, but it is yet to receive any response.

Inherent flaws in scheme

Faulty compensation mechanism is one of the primary reasons for the low adoption rate, with insurance units still remaining at village panchayat level and not at an individual level. Hence, there is no guarantee of farmers getting insurance claims, even if they lose all their crops, unless there is significant loss in that given area. Moreover, existing system of cross checking or assessing the damage by respective authorities and /or audits are not adequate. Corruption cases are being reported from various parts of the country.

Scheme’s reach so far

The PMFBY has insured 36.76 million (26.5 per cent of total household farms) of farmers which is 19 per cent higher than in 2015, when total number of farmers insured were 30.86 million (22.3 per cent of total household farms).  There are 138 million household farms in the country.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Related Story:

Few takers for ambitious crop insurance scheme

Crop insurance scheme hits premium hurdle

Panel set up to review crop insurance recommends agriculture insurance Act

IEP Resources:

Insuring agriculture in times of climate change

Question raised in Rajya Sabha on Implementation of Crop Insurance Schemes, 11/03/2016

State of Rural/Agriculture Banking and Crop Insurance: Standing Committee on Finance (2015-16)

Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY)- Schemes

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.