Economy

Union Budget 2020-21: Constant decline in Swachh Bharat Mission allocation

Output indicators of the allocation unclear

 
By Dinesh Raj Bandela
Last Updated: Tuesday 04 February 2020
Waste collection. Photo: Dinesh Raj Bandela

Union Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman allocated Rs 12,294 crore for 2020-2021 for Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the nation-wide cleanliness campaign that kick-started in 2014 to end open defecation.

The allocation for Swachh Bharat Mission Gramin [SBM(G)] was unchanged from the previous budget, at Rs 9,994 crore. Funds for Swachh Bharat Mission Urban [SBM(U)], however, were reduced by Rs 350 crore to Rs 2,300 crore.

Budgetary allocation for Swachh Bharat, in fact, has been falling since the 2018-19 peak of Rs 15,373 crore.

An extreme, 49 per cent dip in 2019-20 revised estimates may be among the reasons for the decrease this year.

At launch in 2014, the cleanliness mission targeted to build 66.42 lakh household toilets in urban India. In rural areas, 9.24 core households were identified that lacked individual toilets.

A total 10.21 crore toilets were constructed since October 2, 2014 to make India the country open-defecation free (ODF). A major share of SBM(G)’s budgetary allocations was spent on this.

In her February 1, 2020 budget speech, Sitharaman showed a commitment to ODF Plus in order to sustain ODF behaviour and to ensure that no one was left behind. More now needed to be done towards liquid and grey-water management, she said.

Solid waste collection, source segregation and processing will also be in focus. This will mean that the major share of the allocated budget — rural and urban — will be used for solid and liquid waste management, now that no more toilets need to be built.

But, the output outcome framework do not clearly specify the areas of application for SBM(G). As to it, the R. 2,300 crore for SBM(U) will be used on:

Output

Indicator

Target 2020-21

ODF

Construction of individual household toilets 

Total number of household toilets; progress assumed as 62,00,000*

50,000

Construction of community and public toilets

Total number of community and public toilets / urinals;
progress assumed as 5,80,000*

15,000

Solid waste management 

Number of wards with 100% door-to-door collection 

Total number of wards practicing door-to-door collection; progress assumed as 82,000* (84,456 total wards)

1,000

Number of wards with 100% source segregation 

Number of wards with 100% source segregation; progress assumed as 63,000*

7,000

Information education and communication / behavioral communication change 

Public awareness and IEC Campaigns emphasizing upon importance of sanitation in public health

 

Approximately 100 workshops

* By 31st March 2020

 

The target for 2020-21 is unrealistic: to add only 1,000 new wards to door-to-door collection and 7,000 new wards with source segregation. With 4,041 statutory towns, the target for each town is to just add one ward each in one year. 

A detailed spending plan for SBM(G) is missing. Estimates for 2019-20 (Rs 9,994 crore) was repeated for the next year, not only for SBM(G) but also for the Urban Rejuvenation Mission: AMRUT and the Smart Cities Mission (Rs 13,750 crore).

A Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation official, who did not wish to be named, indicated that the SBM(G) allocation was not approved by the ministry; hence estimates from the previous year were used. SBM(G) 2.0 is expected to be announced by March 2020.

Allocations for other core schemes whose budgets can be used for managing solid waste were:

Core Scheme

2020-21 Budget Estimates
(in Rs crore

Jal Jeevan Mission

11,500

Urban Rejuvenation Mission: AMRUT and Smart Cities Mission

13,750

National Livelihood Mission - Ajeevika

10,005

National Ganga Plan and Ghat Works

800

What does the budget lack for SBM

Cities in India have worked on segregation marginally but processing and disposal remains a challenge. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUAs) data shows poor processing percentages — three states at below 10 per cent and 10 below 50 per cent.

Allocating enough funds for exact outcome indicators will be pertinent since the maximum share of an urban local body is spent on waste management.

Also, to encourage a circular economy, recycling and reuse of resources, tax slabs for virgin material should be much higher than scrap processing and recycled material.

The output indicators of the allocation should move forward from mere IEC to include:

  • Allocations based on processing of waste rather than collection
  • Monitoring of solid waste management through IT-enabled systems and implementation of IT and ITES-based analysis of data
  • Encouraging private investments for co-creation of solution in the area of plastics 

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.