Energy

In a first, a thermal power plant decides to use DSI technology to curb SO2 emission

NTPC’s power plant in Dadri is the first in the country to decide on adopting DSI that is expected to lower SO2 emission and eliminate high operational costs

 
By Rohit Pathania
Last Updated: Friday 08 June 2018

The Central Pollution Control Board has asked coal-fired thermal plants to comply with the environmental norms by December 31, 2019. Credit: Wikimedia CommonsIn a significant development, the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC)’s Dadri Power Plant is opting for a Dry Sorbent Injection (DSI) system for controlling sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions and ensuring compliance with the 2015 environmental norms within the stipulated deadline.

The Dadri power station had invited bids in March 2018 from interested manufacturers to install DSI technology. In the first phase, four power generation units with a capacity of 210 MW each will be targeted. The Invitation For Bids (IFB), currently running in its final stages, has laid out the technical criteria, wherein the bidder should have built at least one DSI system “in a pulverised coal fired unit, having flue gas flow of not less than 6,00,000 Nm3/hr, with sulphur dioxide capture efficiency of at least 50%..... The….System should be using Sodium Bicarbonate as reagent and should have been in successful operation for a period not less than one (1) year prior to the date of Techno-Commercial bid opening.”

The power plant has been asked by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to comply with the environmental norms for coal-fired thermal power plants by December 31, 2019. The environment ministry has submitted the information that the plant will be compliant with the environmental norms by 2019 to the Supreme Court as part of the case on air pollution in Delhi, wherein pollution from coal-fired thermal power plants has been included for hearing among other issues.

What is DSI?

As per the Institute of Clean Air Companies in the United States of America (USA), DSI is the practice of injecting a dry alkaline mineral into a flue gas stream to reduce acid gas emission. DSI offers advantages in comparison to traditional acid gas scrubber technology: lower capital cost, wide range of favourable operation conditions, and much lesser time for completing installation and commissioning. While conventional wet limestone flue gas desulphurisation (WLFGD) takes over two years, DSI takes only 12-14 months to be up and running. It also reduces emissions of other acidic gases and heavy metals like mercury.

Sodium sesquicarbonate (or Trona) and sodium bicarbonate are sorbent materials (which can collect molecules of another substance by sorption), though hydrated lime can also be used sometimes. India has surplus sodium bicarbonate production, thanks to the chlor-alkali industry and its sizeable global presence. Thus, the reagent is also not very expensive, eliminating high operational costs as a barrier.

Mechanism of a Dry Sorbent Injection System. Credit: US EIA

Feasibility of the technology is not an issue

G Srikanth, an independent technical expert, believes that the technology choice is appropriate. “The lower capital cost and smaller construction and commissioning time make it ideal for smaller generation units that have stiff deadlines. Moreover, DSI actually improves the efficiency of electrostatic precipitator (ESP), thus reducing the emission levels of Particulate Matter (PM) further,” he said.

Operational costs due to reagents, however, remain a bone of contention. While some experts believe that the reagent in question is expensive, raising the operational costs, others are of the opinion that the higher cost is offset by the lesser quantity of reagent that will be needed in the process.

Notwithstanding the differences in opinions over cost of reagent, this is a significant development for the power sector, as the stations and technology manufacturers had been advocating for flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) as the only solution.

The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), which has been at the forefront of advocating implementation of the 2015 environmental norms, had recommedned that the smaller power generation units (less than 500MW) should be adopting alternatives to the FGD system to achieve compliance with the prescribed standard. Against the 300 mg/Nm3 standard prescribed for 500MW units, the smaller units have to meet 600 mg/Nm3. Interestingly, in a 2016 roundtable conducted by CSE, several representatives of the thermal power industry as well as technology suppliers had agreed to the utility of sorbent injection for the smaller units.

Moreover, sorbent injection is not a new technology. It is not entirely unknown to India. Sorbent injection with hydrated lime as the reagent has been in practice for a long time in the cement and steel industries in the country to control SO2 emissions.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories
Related Blogs

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Can post a article about the benefits of FGD system
    Thanks

    Posted by: ARun Kumar Dash | one year ago | Reply
  • With extraction of Acid gas compounds along with Dry Fly Ash through ESP what will be the impact of this additional element on Fly ash cement industries and Fly Ash Brick industries?Else this compounds discharged with wet Ash will may have impact on Ash Pond discharge water.

    Posted by: Mrinal Biswas | one year ago | Reply
  • Very informative .Only costing needs to be added.

    Posted by: Vinod Khedkar | one year ago | Reply