Green tribunal gets short shrift

Most successful court on environmental matters lacks amenities, infrastructure
Green tribunal gets short shrift

WHEN THE National Green Tribunal (NGT) reopens on July 2 after a month-long vacation, it will be two days away from completing a year of existence. Disposing of a case almost every third working day, the one-of-its kind court has suspended more than a dozen industrial projects, cleared by the Union environment ministry, on the basis of faulty evaluation (see: ‘Decisions taken’). For the jury members of NGT, however, the past year has been a rough ride.

The tribunal, which was constituted by Parliament, lacks basic amenities and necessary infrastructure.

From day one, NGT has been operating from a temporary office and a makeshift court room in Delhi’s Van Vigyan Bhavan which was earlier used as guest house by the environment ministry. The official accommodation given to NGT members—many of whom are retired high court judges—are the guest rooms of the Van Vigyan Bhavan building. The members live without their families because of lack of enough space and absence of kitchen. Even if the members want to rent a house they cannot, because their salary is too little for a decent accommodation.

The members get only 30 per cent of their basic salary Rs 80,000 as housing rent allowance, which is not on a par with most of the other such tribunals and commissions in the country (see: ‘Underpaid, overworked’).



Members of the Central Information Commission; National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission; and National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) have been provided with government residential accommodation, while NDMA members enjoy the rank of Minister of State.

More work, less people

On an average, NGT hears eight cases every day. In the past one year it has disposed of 98 cases and about 200 are pending. Given its increasing popularity, more cases are expected. But since its inception, NGT has been reeling under staff shortage. More than 95 posts, including that of a registrar, are vacant in NGT.

Landmark judgements
 
Some of the decisions of the National Green Tribunal (NGT)

September 12, 2011: In its first judgment, NGT suspends the environment clearance of a mining project by Gogte Minerals in Maharashtra’s Sindhudurg district. The Bench finds the Terms of Reference (ToR) for conducting the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of the mines were violated

February 9, 2012: Suspends environment clearance granted to Scania Steel and Power Ltd for expansion of its sponge iron plant in Chhattisgarh in the absence of public hearing. NGT directs the Union environment ministry to develop mechanism to check authenticity of environmental data and blacklist EIA consultants who provide wrong data

February 24, 2012: Sets aside environment clearance granted to the municipal solid waste processing plant of Municipal Corporation of Chennai for providing false information in the EIA

March 30, 2012: Suspends clearance granted to South Korean steel giant POSCO’s project in Odisha. It points out the memorandum of understanding between the Odisha government and POSCO was for the production of 12 million tonnes of steel per annum (MTPA) while the EIA report was prepared for four MTPA

May 23, 2012: Suspends environmental clearance of the 2,640 MW thermal power project of Nagarjuna Construction Company in Andhra Pradesh’s Srikakulam district. It says the EIA process was undertaken on the basis of wrong data furnished by the project proponent.

NGT orders environment ministry to revise guidelines for setting up thermal power plants in the country which were framed in 1987
 
Unheard voices

Related Stories

No stories found.
Down To Earth
www.downtoearth.org.in