Health

COVID-19: All 4 repurposed drugs fail to show efficacy in WHO Solidarity Trial

The drugs failed to reduce mortality, hospitalisation stay and initiation of ventilation in admitted patients 

 
By Banjot Kaur
Published: Friday 16 October 2020
All four repurposed drugs fail to show efficacy to treat COVID-19 in WHO Solidarity Trial.

Four repurposed drugs being tried to treat the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients did not reduce mortality in the hospitalised patients, results of the World Health Organization (WHO)-coordinated global Solidarity Trial showed. 

The four anti-viral repurposed drugs — remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), lopinavir, and interferon-β — failed to reduce mortality rate in the patients (moderate as well as severe) admitted in hospitals, the WHO stated.

Repurposed drugs are those that are used to treat other viral diseases and used on an experimental basis to treat a novel disease.

As many as 11,266 patients in 405 hospitals across 30 countries were part of the trial. The Solidarity Trial — international clinical trial to help find an effective treatment for COVID-19 — were conducted in all six WHO regions.

The trials were conducted between March 22 and October 4. The findings were published in a non-peer-reviewed pre-print server medRxiv.

Of the total patients, remdesivir was administered to 2,750; HCQ to 954; Lopinavir-ritonavir to 1,411; and interferon to 2,063.

At least 4,088 patients were part of the control arm, that is, they were not given any of these four study drugs, so that the results could be compared with those who were given the drugs.

There was no difference in the number of patients dying of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 — whether they were administered any of these four drugs or not — the study found. 

MORTALITY RESULTS  
NAME OF DRUG ACTIVE ARM (NO OF DEAD/TOTAL ENROLLED) CONTROL ARM (NO OF DEAD/TOTAL ENROLLED)
Remdesivir 301/2743 303/2708
Hydroxychloroquine 104/947 84/906
Lopinavir 148/1399 146/1372
Interferon 243/2050 216/2050

The other results were as follows:

  • Another aim of the trial was to check if these drugs reduced the initiation of ventilation. None of the drugs could actually do so. The number of patients ventilated after being administered remdesivir was 295 as 284 against the control arm. The similar corresponding numbers for drug vs control arm in the case of HCQ was 75 / 66; 124 / 119 in case of lopinavir; and 209 / 210 in case of interferon.
  • The third aim of the trial was to see if the drugs helped reduce the duration of hospital stay. The trial findings showed that did not happen.

The trial looked into whether the drugs could treat COVID-19. The jury on the preventive role of these drugs, the WHO said, is still out.

What next?

The world may have to pin its hopes on new anti-viral drugs, immunomodulators (drugs which modulate the activity of immune system) and monoclonal antibodies (mAB).

mABs are neutralising antibodies that are produced artificially. mAB therapy, much like convalescent plasma (CP) therapy, introduces neutralising antibodies in a patient suffering from a disease.

However, monoclonal antibodies are produced in a laboratory set-up; CP induces natural antibodies. Since mABs are produced in a well-defined set-up, the amount of antibodies to stimulate immunity is carefully measured.  

mABs are also fairly expensive and not considered a common man’s drug.

“We may consider the fact that mABs have shown some kind of life-saving potential. So we can test them further and see if we get positive results. In that case, we can try to produce them in large numbers so that the cost comes down,” K Srinath Reddy, who was part of the WHO trial, told Down To Earth.

“One thing is for sure: Four repurposed drugs are out of the radar. Now, we would be looking at other low-cost spectrum drugs — be it new anti-virals or other existing drugs that can be repurposed to treat COVID-19,” he added.

Two of these four drugs — HCQ and remdesivir — are part of India’s clinical management protocol of COVID-19.

Reddy, who is also part of national COVID-19 Task Force of India, refused to comment whether these two antiviral drugs should be taken off the Indian protocol. “That is for the government to evaluate and tell,” he said.

Independent experts, however, said the Indian government must quickly take a call.

“This was the largest trial ever conducted among varied populations and the results are not ambiguous. So the Indian government should not waste its limited financial resources on these drugs and quickly make a judgment,” SP Kalantri, medical superintendent at the Mahatma Gandhi Institute for Medical Sciences (MGIMS) in Sevagram, said.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.