Indian automakers' tryst with new emission norms is throwing up surprises
Effective April 1, 2005, eleven Indian cities adopted Bharat Stage III (bs-iii) norms for vehicular emissions. But you can still register a vehicle that meets the outdated bs-ii norms. Only it should have been manufactured before April 1, 2005. The bs-iii notification clearly points out vehicles manufactured on and from April 1 and not vehicles registered from April 1, 2005. A Delhi transport department official says, "Ideally the cut-off date should have been for registration and not manufacture. Manufacturers will clearly use this for some more time, before registering only bs-iiicars."
Manufacturers are exploiting this loophole to sell bs-ii cars in the eleven Indian cities. "No manufacturer will have stocks to last that long. Pure economic sense dictates that the bs-ii stock would be exhausted in just a couple of weeks," counters a spokesperson of the largest automobile firm.
The Maruti spokesperson explains: "There have been some major improvements at parts level like the O2 sensors, which not only are heated type but are specially designed for super fast light off. The exhaust system has been redesigned with the introduction of close coupled catalyzers, commonly called Maniverters." Similarly it is learnt that in Hyundai Santro, one of the largest selling models, the catalyst loading has been changed and so has the ecu. Similarly Tata Motors have also optimised the system and change in the catalytic converter loading resulted in meeting the required norms.
The Tata Motors spokesperson said, "Indica diesel bs-ii has a mechanical system, and we have introduced electronic fuel injection system in our Indica bs-iii." Automobile experts opine that by merely moving from a mechanical system to an electronic system would help automakers meet the bs-iii norms in most cases. A change in the catalyst loading would do the needful after that.
The right step, technologically, would have been to move to direct injection (di), from indirect injection (idi) for the diesel passenger cars. But interestingly most of the vehicles are meeting the bs-iii norms with idi. In idi fuel is injected into a pre-chamber where ignition occurs and combustion then spreads to the main combustion chamber, while in di the fuel is sprayed directly into and ignited in the combustion chamber. Historically, idi diesel engines have exhibited lower emission levels than the di engines. With the recent developments, however, this is no longer a case. Automakers accept they would be moving to di engines for bs-iv and also for bs-iii subsequently, but not now.
What's more interesting however is the fact that the bs-iii norms clearly ignored the onboard diagnostic (obd) system. The directive that brought in Euro iii norms in European countries also requires that "vehicles of Category m1 and n1 equipped with positive-ignition engines must be fitted with an obd system for emission control." It is believed that none of the models being sold now have obd. Tata Motors explains, "For export, our Euro iii models are equipped with the obd. For domestic there is no requirement as per norms."
Herein lies the real story. obd helps check the reduction in the catalytic converter's efficiency with respect to the emissions of hc, the presence of engine misfire, the deterioration of the oxygen sensors, and other emission control systems. These elements are critical for India because it is difficult to ascertain if a catalytic converter is functioning well. obd helps ascertain this. What Indian models do have is the malfunctioning indicating light (mil), a primitive version of the obd, but this doesn't help keep a check on the catalytic converter.
Indian manufacturers are unanimous on obd. As there is no regulation, there isn't a need for it. Maruti, for instance, says, "It isn't enough that just the vehicle be equipped with obd . There are issues related to servicing habits of users, fuel specifications and adulteration and general lack of infrastructure, which does not make it feasible to have an obd system on our vehicles."
While four-wheelers moved to bs-iii, two-wheelers moved to bs-ii . As India is one of the world's largest two-wheeler markets, major technological changes were anticipated. Technological competition was expected to play a major role, given that Honda and Yamaha were are now present in India. Thus, while Bajaj Auto was pitted against the Honda subsidiary in India, the Honda Motorcycles and Scooters India limited, for the scooters market, Hero Honda and tvs Motors were pitted against the subsidiary of Yamaha Corporation.
Specifically to address the emission compliance to the bs-ii norms, as far as the four-stroke two-wheelers are concerned, employment of secondary air injection, catalytic converter or hot tube (either alone or in combination) has been relied upon. It is reliably learnt that Hero Honda has used a similar strategy. Yamaha, Bajaj are no different either.
Historically, two-stroke two-wheelers had higher emission levels then the four-stroke engines. As a result of tigher emissions norms, it was thought that the two-stroke engine will die a natural death. But it seems that we were underestimating the technological capabilities of the Indian automakers. tvs has done a lot of work on the two-stroke and they are continuing with their two-stroke models. "In case of two-stroke engines we are already using catalytic converters to meet the bs-i. For meeting bs-ii we are using a combination of bigger sized catalysts, dual catalyst system and secondary air injection as needed to reduce emissions," says tvs. Similarly, Bajaj and Hero Honda are not putting brakes on the two-stroke engines.
A senior official from the industry says, "Yamaha has totally stopped the production of two-stroke engines. It is difficult to meet bs-ii with two-stroke technology. Various manufacturers, though, would still be producing the two-stroke engines. But we thought it would be prudent to continue with the four-stroke." Another first in India, perhaps, would be a fuel injection two-wheeler. It is learnt that Yamaha is the only manufacturer close to introducing a fuel injection bike (in their Frazer model).
Though all manufacturers are working on fuel injection, nobody is close to Yamaha. Though not essential to meet bs-ii, it is considered essential to meet bs-iii to come in from 2008. Though it may sound obvious, it is anybody's guess how much would be changed to meet the future norms.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.