Pesticide makers build case to get endosulfan ban lifted

Affidavit filed in court claims pesticide is safe

Pesticide manufacturers are leaving no stone unturned to get the ban on endosulfan lifted and obtain a clean chit for the pesticide. The Supreme Court had banned the sale, manufacture, use and export of the pesticide on May 13 this year. The pesticide makers have submitted a counter affidavit in the Supreme Court, in which they have reiterated their stand that though it is alleged that there are health impacts of endosulfan in Kasaragod and Dakshin Kannada districts in Kerala and Karnataka, there is no causative link established between the pesticide and the health problems.

The case is being heard by the bench comprising chief justice S H Kapadia,  Swatantar Kumar and K S P Radhakrishnan. Through the many hearings since May 13, the judges seem inclined to continue ban on endosulfan. They have called for the suggestions from an expert committee and others on the safer alternatives to endosulfan. The next hearing is scheduled for November 10. 

FAO, WHO clean chit?

The affidavit states that endosulfan has been wrongly targeted by the petitioners, the Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI-Kerala wing), the youth wing of CPI (M). According to the manufacturers, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have given a clean chit to endosulfan. So has the interim report of the Supreme Court-appointed joint committee of the director general of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the Agriculture  Commissioner.

Petitioners press for continued ban

  • There are nearly 316 peer reviewed and published studies that show that endosulfan has severe health impacts
  • The Persistent Organic Pollutant Review Committee (POPRC) of the Stockholm Convention had recommended that Endosulfan be included in Annex A because it was harmful and that it should be banned globally
  • FAO at the fifth Conference of Parties (COP 5) to the Stockholm Convention, in April this year, had openly refuted India's claim and had stated that endosulfan was a hazardous pesticide
  • World Health Organization (WHO), in the sidelines of the COP 5, had mentioned that they could not include endosulfan in 2006 because it was around that time that UNEP had approached POPRC to decide on the health impacts of endosulfan and POPRC had said that endosulfan is harmful
 
What peer reviewed studies say
New panel for Kerala's endosulfan victims

Related Stories

No stories found.
Down To Earth
www.downtoearth.org.in