We are ready to give rights to animals. It sounds and looks good. The question is where do we draw the line?
Even as the authorities in Delhi are preparing a crackdown upon 5,000 monkeys frequenting the corridors of power in Lutyen's Delhi, a move is being made in New Zealand to give legally enforceable rights to apes in New Zealand.
The great apes project has the backing of 38 scientists and lawyers. They have come closer to achieving their aim with the introduction of a new draft law in New Zealand that will give apes legally enforceable rights. Their ultimate aim is to work towards a United Nations declaration on the rights of the great apes. Their argument for ape rights is based on just one premise. The genetic similarity between humans and apes.
But are we not all descended from the same single-celled amoeba? Are not all animals cousins in the ultimate analysis? Then there is another question. How will the medical community react to this? Great apes are used for a wide range of drug testing in many countries including the us . How will this drug testing fare?
Then is giving rights to animals all that good? Can it prove counterproductive? Will giving rights to tigers help prevent poaching? A law already exists in India which outlaws hunting. Will freeing circus animals help them or create a problem for them.
Animal rights activists in India have, for example, filed cases against circus owners which may render hundreds of lions, tigers and monkeys homeless. Some of these animals are sick and no zoo will be willing to take them. They are dependent upon humans for food and may not be in a position to survive in the wild. Giving them liberty at this stage may mean nothing short of giving them death.
In fact, in exceptional circumstances like this, it may be better that animals have the right to work and the right to better food and better living conditions. There is a Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. It should be given more teeth to monitor their welfare. The only kind of publicity that an animal rights activist will get out of this entire exercise will be bad publicity. Elaine Fuchs and her team at the University of Chicago, usa , are also worried. Fuchs is one of the few scientists seeking solutions for premature hair loss. And now, they think they might have the answer. For the first time, they have 'persuaded' adult mice to grow new hair follicles and they say this could lead to alternative treatments for hair loss ( Cell , Vol 95, No 5).
The adult human body has some five million hair strands, of which about 100,000 to 150,000 are on the scalp. Below the skin is the hair root which is surrounded by a sack-like structure called the hair follicle. At the base of the follicle is the papilla, the 'hair manufacturing plant' of sorts. It is fed by the blood-stream which carries nourishment to produce new hair.
Hair growth is regulated by male hormones or androgens. Unlike hair in other parts of the body, scalp hair is not directly androgen-responsive, but influenced by local amounts of a derivative of the male hormone testosterone called dihydrotestosterone. Hair follicles initially are formed in the embryonic stage. No new follicles are created after birth, and none are lost in adult life.
Scalp hair fibres grow from follicles which occupy the human scalp. However, not all the follicles are productive. In each producing follicle, the duration of the hair's life cycle is influenced by age, pathology and a wide variety of other physiological factors. New hair strands are created when the follicles draw on stores of undifferentiated cells and baldness occurs when these are exhausted.
Regrowth of hair on a balding pate is a multi-billion dollar business. Experts, from scientists to quacks, have been trying to make it a reality with varying degrees of success. Hormonal creams that stimulate the dormant hair follicles to produce new hair are available. Doctors and beauticians also carry out follicle transplants. But these treatments have had limited success and no one has been able to generate new follicles in an adult.
A few years ago, Fuchs and her team discovered that embryonic cells destined to become follicles produce a protein called Lef-1. They also learnt that Lef-1 had a protein partner called beta catenin that stimulates follicle development when it accumulates in the adult cells. They wondered whether a constant surplus of beta catenin might stimulate growth of new follicles. To test this theory, they created transgenetic or genetically-engineered mice that produce a truncated form of beta catenin which lingers in the cells for a longer period of time.
To the researchers' delight, the transgenetic mice kept growing new hair follicles even after they reached adulthood. But there was a serious hitch. In addition to follicles, the scientists observed that the mice also developed follicle tumours, because of uncontrolled growth. These, however, were not malignant. Another good sign: hair was growing in all directions.
The glitches notwithstanding, this is the first time anyone has managed to create new hair follicles in adult cells. Fuchs believes that short-term treatment with a cream or a drug could make new hair follicles form in humans, leading to new hair growth. She has already patented the discovery and is trying hard to develop what unhappy owners of receding hairlines have been waiting for: a drug for hair growth.
George Consarelis, director of the Hair and Scalp Clinic at the University of Pennsylvania, usa , who has been studying hair follicles and stem cells for years, says, "It is really an outstanding paper. It shows that beta catenin is one of the earliest steps in hair follicle formation." What he doubts is whether beta catenin alone will be able to help in treating baldness, especially since in the transgenetic mice the chemical was available since birth while lot of bald people will be well into their middle ages when they start using the hair-raising formula.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.