Bureaucrats want right to reject right to information applications
on june 4 this year, President Pratibha Patil called for strengthening the right to information law while addressing
Parliament. Four months down the line, the department of personnel and training (dopt) under the ministry of
personnel is doing exactly the opposite.
The department coordinates personnel matters for the Union government and wants information officers of ministries and government agencies to have the power to reject applications that are vexatious and frivolous. dopt also seeks to exempt decisions/consultations (read file notings) that take place before arriving at a decision from the purview of Right to Information (rti) act, saying it hampers free flow of thought within the government.The proposed amendments were presented by dopt on October 14 at a meeting with information commissioners from various states.
The information commissioners did not approve the amendments. rti activists and information commissioners have shot off separate letters to the Prime Minister urging him to stall any amendment to the rti act.
Activist Arvind Kejriwal said the proposed amendments will kill the rti act. He said the attempt to exclude file notings once again from the purview of the act shows the government is under pressure from bureaucracy. The Central Information Commission had, however, settled this issue in 2006 when it said file notings are within the purview of the rti act.
Nikhil Dey of the non-profit Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan in Rajasthan said if these proposals get accepted, information officers would start rejecting rti applications at their whims and fancies.
State information commissioner Sailesh Gandhi who attended the dopt meeting said the proposed amendments defeat the very purpose of the act. If an application tries to expose a corrupt officer, it would be termed vexatious. But in a democracy, change depends on vexation, said Gandhi. Similarly queries raised by an applicant would be important to him but would get rejected as frivolous, he said.
As of now, the rti act does not say an applicant has to give reasons for seeking information. An amendment would mean he or she would have to prove the questions in the rti application are neither vexatious nor frivolous.
Gandhi said there is a strong case for not introducing any amendment. The information officers have now begun to understand the act; any amendments will further confuse them and hamper its implementation, the information commissioner said. There were a few other amendments proposed by the dopt like making it easy for non-resident Indians to apply for information. These changes can be effected through notifications and change in rules; amendments are not required, said Gandhi.
Gandhis arguments are backed by two studies. They show that lack of training of government staff is the main constraint in implementing the rti act. One was a government study and the other was conducted by a peoples forum, National Campaign for Peoples Right to Information along with rti Assessment and Analysis Group.
Activists alleged that dopt is trying to introduce amendments without discussion or consultations in spite of past assurances that no changes would be introduced without amendment.
A senior official in the ministry of personnel said the amendments are at a nascent stage and consultations would be held before any amendment is introduced. He said there is no deadline for introducing amendments.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.