Science & Technology

Immortality is mathematically impossible, new research finds

A mathematical equation has proven that controlling one of the two major changes in a cell—decay or cancerous growth—enhances the other, causing inevitable death

 
By Akshit Sangomla
Last Updated: Thursday 02 November 2017

The desire to be immortal has led scientists and companies to research longevity (Credit: Pixabay)

Human beings seem to be obsessed with the idea of immortality, and their long-standing fixation with it has been a part of cultural narratives—showing up in the ancient epic Mahabharata, the hit fantasy series Harry Potter and The Man from Earth, among many others. Our species' desire to be immortal has led scientists and companies to research longevity and hoodwinking death.

A study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has stated, through a mathematical equation, that it is impossible to stop ageing in multicellular organisms, which include humans, bringing the immortality debate to a possible end.

According to the study, titled Intercellular Competition and Inevitability of Multicellular Aging, the human body goes through two major changes at the cellular level as it ages: first, the function of cells shuts down, making them sluggish and second, cells become increasingly cancerous with age. The researchers from the University Of Arizona, who conducted the study, found that controlling any one of these processes will enhance the other. This means that a human being has to either die of cancerous growth in her body or the failing of cells, which will lead to the eventual dysfunction of organs.

In a report on Phys.org, Paul Nelson, who is the lead author of the study says, "As you age, most of your cells are ratcheting down and losing function, and they stop growing, as well.”

"But some of your cells are growing like crazy. What we show is that this forms a double bind - a catch-22. If you get rid of those poorly functioning, sluggish cells, then that allows cancer cells to proliferate, and if you get rid of, or slow down, those cancer cells, then that allows sluggish cells to accumulate. So you're stuck between allowing these sluggish cells to accumulate and allowing cancer cells to proliferate, and if you do one you can't do the other. You can't do them both at the same time," he adds.

The argument for immortality

Scientists have wondered why nature has not selected any life form to be immortal, if it was a possibility. There are examples of long-living trees like the bristle cone pine, which grows in the arid parts of the US and can live for 5000 years, and the round worm C elegans which can go into a coma for four months and come back to life. But no living being lives forever.

Scientists have investigated this possible oversight of natural selection, studying why nature or evolution has not done away with the process of aging altogether. The current research on the topic is based on the hypothesis that science can trump aging, at least in theory. The practical way out, the scientists say, is by making cells healthier and then pushing natural selection to choose between healthy cells over non-functioning cells.

 A detailed coverage by Down to Earth explored the approaches towards making cells healthy with the help of insulin signaling genes, sirtuins—a protein that may prolong life and rapamycin—a compound that has been known to extend lifespan in mice and yeast. Some other strands of research have aspired to identify the rare genes or regions of genomes within cells, which comprise the entire sequence of genes in an organism, that have allowed some humans to live longer lives and use them to find the ultimate key to human immortality. Though many of these have yielded positive results on other animals, there is no conclusive evidence for a solution to human ageing.

There are also many ongoing efforts by companies and research groups to know more about human health and death. Verily – Google’s life sciences subsidiary is trying to understand human health in a broad way through its project Baseline. The Resilience project of the Icahn School of Medicine is working to understand the hidden factors that keep people away from disease.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • This is wrong. We once thought flying to be impossible, but now it's part of our world and we could never imagine living without it. We've already had successful studies where we increased the average lifespan of worms by 44%. Now, this is a worm, not a human, but my point is this. We already have multiple studies showing it is a very real possibility. And yes, there is complications, but we know many of the complications and have ways of overcoming it. To call immortality impossible is wrong. I truly believe one day it will be a very real possibility.

    Posted by: Slurp | one year ago | Reply
  • Interesting, but ultimately false article. Lobsters are functionally immortal in the sense that they don't seem to age. What kills them is that they lose the metabolic energy needed to moult. Unlike humans, their telomerase seems to be infinitely more potent, as humans lose it when they age - lobsters don't.

    There is also a tree aged at about 5,067 years.

    Regardless. There are organisms with suspected biological immortality or something that approaches it. We merely need to figure out how to transfer it.

    What this article shows is merely that we can't get rid of these cells (for right now). It shows nothing as to whether we can stop them from losing function in the first place, which is what most immortality research is aimed at in the first place. Nice title for clickbait, though!

    Posted by: Mike D. | one year ago | Reply
  • Nano Robots could potentially replace biological cells.

    Posted by: Skeq | 12 months ago | Reply