Why 700 litres free water daily may remain a far cry for Delhi

Arvind Kejriwal has kept his promise to Delhi by announcing the supply of 20 kilolitres a month (almost 700 litres a day) of free water for city households from January 1, 2014. But will he be successful in making the facility available to every household in Delhi or will the poor be left out? Down To Earth analyses the challenges the Aam Aadmi Party leader is likely to face

 
By Soma Basu
Last Updated: Thursday 17 September 2015

Households in Govindpuri slum fight over water from a Delhi Jal Board tanker that empties in minutes. The slum colony has no regular water supply or sanitation facilities. (Photo: Sayantan Bera)

Santosh Singh, a resident of Sangam Vihar and a worker at confectioner’s shop, was threatened with a gun the last time he talked about water availability in his locality. All he had done to get such a treatment was to seek his neighbour’s support to ask Delhi Jal Board (DJB) to provide a new tubewell for area.

The rogues from Delhi’s tanker mafia, which is paid a handsome amount by the residents for installing a borewell, sarcastically asked his wife whether Santosh had life insurance. He was unable to do anything to get water from DJB and his wife, till today, has to go and fetch water from private tankers amidst catcalls. At times, even glass shards are thrown at his doorstep by the mafia men. Of the Rs 6,000 that Santosh earns, he is forced to pay Rs 400 to the mafia for getting access to water extracted from ‘government’ borewells.

Kejriwal on Monday announced the supply of 20 kilolitres a month (almost 700 litres a day) of free water for Delhi households from January 1, 2014. The decision came after a meeting with the Delhi Jal Board (DJB) officials. Vijay Kumar, the new CEO of DJB, told reporters that 20 kilolitres of free water per month and 670 litres per day will be provided to households with working meters. People who use more this will have to pay for the total amount of water they consume. The supply of water under this plan would continue till March 2014.
 
But the Aam Aadmi Party leader's decision means that water would be free for Santosh’s employer who stays in Kalkaji, but Santosh will still keep paying Rs 400 or even double the amount just because he does not have a pipeline water connection provided by the government.

The party manifesto also says that water is the biggest concern for the “aam aadmi” in Delhi as more than five million people do not get piped water in their homes. Kejriwal has assured that all households in Delhi will get water in their homes, irrespective of their location in slums, authorised or unauthorised colonies, and has clarified that a solution will be found for those who do not have piped water supply. This, however, may mean that till the way is not found, the water sop will be given to people who are better off while the "aam aadmi" would continue to face water scarcity and end up paying a lot for the water he gets. 


image

Decoding the AAP promise

Considering that the average number of people in a family is five, AAP promise means 140 litres per capita per day (LPCD) and 21kilolitre (kl) consumption per household per month. A household with this amount of consumption per month falls in the third slab of water tariff, which will now be subsidised.

According to government estimates, 30 per cent of Delhi’s 22 million population lives in urban villages and unauthorized colonies (called jhuggi jhopri or JJ clusters) and these areas do not have an official water-pipe connection. Delhi has 14,000 km of extensive water pipeline network. But, only 68 per cent of city’s 2.5 million households s i.e. 1.7 million households have piped water connections while the rest of 38 per cent remains unreached. About 25 per cent of the city area remains uncovered by piped water supply.

According to the recent National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) survey, 15.6 per cent of Delhi's urban households and 29.7 per cent of its rural ones don't get sufficient drinking water throughout the year.

The areas which do not have pipelines meet their water requirement through handpumps and tankers. Also, there are a few newly developed localities which do not have an official pipeline yet. Here, the demand is met invariably through tankers or groundwater. This inequity in distribution leads to inequity in supply. The per capita availability of water in the city varies from shocking 29 LPCD in parts of outer Delhi such as Mehrauli to as high as 509 LPCD in the posh residential areas falling under the administration of New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC).

image

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report, released in April 2013, had exposed the poor provision of public services to residents of Delhi and also pointed out at the inequity in water supply. It stated that 24.8 per cent of Delhi’s population is being supplied 3.82 litres per capita daily, which is far less than the minimum stipulated average of 40 litres, established by the World Health Organisation. When the CAG carried out a study of the command area of the Nangloi plant, one of the six treatment plants for Delhi, it found the prevalence of iniquitous supply, ranging from three litres to more than 220 litres per person per day. DJB had defended this by stating that “large number of unauthorized growth in unplanned colonies in west and southwest Delhi has led to an unrationalised supply of water.”

Skewed water supply
Per capita supply per day Population served
Below 20 litres 573,000
20 to 50 litres 879,000
50 to 75 litres 332,000
75 to 100 litres 134,000
100 to 150 litres 40,000
Above 150 litres 390,000
Source: CAG Audit Report No. 2 of the year 2013


“The Delhi Jal Board neither has a proper system to measure the water supplied to different areas nor does it have access to reliable data on population in different areas. It, therefore, cannot ensure equitable supply of water,” noted the report released in April. To indicate the potential loss in revenues, less than 40 per cent of water produced was billed during last three years. Also, 679,000 connections (35 per cent) of the 1,964,000 water connections in the city are without functional metres. DJB has plans to install 800,000 new meters, but the deadlines for these projects remain unclear.

‘Things cannot be changed overnight’

According to the latest Delhi Economic Survey, the city has a network of about 11,350 km of water supply mains. But a significant portion of this is 40-50 years old and prone to leakages.

"Of the total pipeline-network length of 14,000 km, only 200 km was repaired in 2012-2013. Water loss due to leakage is as much as 45 per cent and there are issues like inequitable distribution and lack of storage capacity. These issues cannot be resolved overnight,” said a senior official of DJB. He also told us that Kejriwal had a meeting with DJB core officials on last Thursday.

In Sangam Vihar alone, the government has dug 118 borewells from where the residents have to draw water. However, these borewells are monopolized by the tanker mafia. Many have dried out due to exploitation over the years. If people like Santosh raise their voice against the system, they are threatened and even beaten up. The Delhi Jal Board, which manages about 250 water tankers itself, has partially outsourced the supply of water through tankers to three private corporations.

If a citizen calls an emergency number of the Delhi Jal Board to ask for water, it is obligatory for the board to send a tanker within three hours. But, citizens say that the emergency numbers are either non-functional or remain busy throughout the day.

Storage another problem

“Even if the pipelines are laid overnight, where will the people store 700 litres of water? The infrastructural flaws in the houses in these urban villages and unauthorized colonies are bound to trigger wastage. Especially when there is a huge gap between water availability and demand,” said the DJB official.

The Delhi Jal Board (DJB) supplies about 835 million gallon daily (MGD) whereas the current requirement of the city is about 1,025 MGD. A few reports suggest that the average supply in 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 was 800, 835 and 818 MGD respectively.

According to the CAG report, the untreated water that DJB gets is not sufficient to meet Delhi’s demand. The shortfall is being met through private borewells and private vendors. The report makes several valid points regarding leakages in the system, lack of monitoring and measurement, and importantly the non-removal of silt from Yamuna at Wazirabad pond. It also says that the pond, which is the source of water for Wazirabad and Chandrawal water treatment plants, can reduce its holding capacity due to deposit of silt to the extent of three to four feet. The last time the pond was dredged was in 2006. DJB replied to the CAG query on why the silt has not been removed yet by saying that “…not much expertise exists in Delhi”. The CAG report stated that “the reply is not convincing as dredging was carried out in 2006 as well.”

‘AAP benchmark against global practice’

The Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) has set a benchmark for the per capita water usage at 135 LPCD. According to the AAP promise, every person would get 140 LPCD which including the leakage would stand at approximately 175 LPCD. “Supplying 175 LPCD is too much and against global practice. This can easily be reduced to 110 LPCD with conservation efforts like using mug and bucket in place of flush or shower and. This way, an individual in India would require maximum 50 to 60 litres of water every day and a family of five members would need only 350 litres,” said Manoj Mishra, convener of Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan. He also suggested that instead of providing free water, government should have tariff slabs and charge as low as 50 paise per litre for the first 700-litre bracket.

Apart from 700 litre free water, AAP manifesto also promises transparency in the functioning of the DJB, which presently keeps no account of how much water is being received from different sources and how much water is being supplied to each area. Bulk meters would also be installed and the data gathered from them will be put on the DJB website every day. The party, which has openly opposed privatisation of DJB, has promised to clamp down the tanker mafia. It is also committed to long-run solutions like city-wide rainwater harvesting, revival of Delhi’s water bodies and conservation and recycling of water.

Public participation for better sanitation

To connect provide sewage facilities to all households, irrespective of them being slums or unauthorised colonies, the party has assured construction of 200,000 community and public toilets and availability of small, decentralised sewage plants managed by Mohalla Sabhas.  The manifesto also says that waste would be managed with direct participation of people by encouraging separation of bio-degradable and non-biodegradable waste at the household level and imposing fines for littering.
 
“Let us hope for the best. I have been living here for the past 8-9 years. Every now and then I have had to wade through foot deep sewage water on the road along the DDA Park. We were convinced that we will have to wait for another eight or nine years to get proper sanitation and water facilities. So, waiting a few more months is not a bad idea at all,” says Prakash Varma, resident of Sangam Vihar.

“If Kejriwal keeps his promises, it could bring positive changes. But does he has enough time so make so many changes?” asks Mahesh Verma, an RTI activist.

Statistics

 


Aam Aadmi Party: Delhi Election Manifesto 2013

Infographics: Green talk by our leaders

Key indicators of drinking water, sanitation, hygiene and housing condition in India

Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on social sector (Non-PSUs) of Government of Delhi

Economic survey of Delhi 2012-13

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories
Related Interview

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Excellent report/post and

    Excellent report/post and very good information about overall water supply need and plan for distribution. AAP has done what is possible immediately.

    But do we need a model where water,traffic,space,electricity or all other basic needs of people should be take as accountable as a part of City planning resources and if possible than only city should allow so many people to migrate in Big cities.

    I am not against the model of migration but city development board should be in position to handle such needs of people.People are migrating into big cities for better pay, work opportunities. But such basic needs not taken care can only create chaos in city.

    We should have provision where small cities have good amount of employment opportunities and less people migrate to big cities.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • Solid articles with facts. We

    Solid articles with facts. We expect the same kind of articles, not the politically biased rants.
    thank you

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • Giving great promises in

    Giving great promises in convincing manner to get elected is the main agenda of all the parties. All other parties have tried that successfully and got elected in the past. It wont work always for same party. Just like we see same soaps in different names from same Procter & Gamble. Similarly, the people on "TOP" try with different parties. Let us not be cynical and give the benefit of doubt to this young party so that they can prove this theory wrong.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • Good analysis and interesting

    Good analysis and interesting facts! It would be good if AAP comes out with strategic road map on how it intends to implement the eye catching theorized mandates.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • After reading the article I

    After reading the article I felt that AAP should have done reverse. They should have kept the charges same for water usage and should have imposed e disproportionately high charges for extra usage. This will penalize the wastage and conserve the water which is the first need. The money collected from water usage to metered connections should be used to provide water infrastructure to uncovered areas, providing them with permanent piped connections. At the same time water usage up to certain threshold should be made free, which will benefit masses in true sense. The poor people who use less water will thus get indirectly benefited. However, in politics, these things are hard to sell. Finally a party which can make people believe in their promises irrespective of feasibility of their promises wins. If AAP really wants to change politics, they should work on this basic issue and take right actions, even if they could be unpopular. That is the kind of politics which India needs badly. Let us hope the 'khaas' people of AAP realize this sooner.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • Knew DTE would come up with

    Knew DTE would come up with startling details. However we must give credit to the new chief minister for trying. He has a tough job ahead .

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • Well begun is half done..

    Well begun is half done.. Kudos to the AAP team, all other parties are literally running out of ideas now.

    The key differentiators are not only promising but also executing. The road ahead may be bumpy but then Rome was not built in a day.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • I turned to DTE with

    I turned to DTE with expectation and I as usual DTE has helped by providing analysis of the facts and data.

    I wonder whether going for 'free' water is a good policy in the long run. We have limited resources and we need to use them judicially. From what the figures show, it is clear that poor are not going to benefit from AAP's policy. I also wonder how much consumption is there in reality as Delhi Jal Board. AAP's policy does not seem to take into consideration the 'distribution leakage' issue - though AAP keeps on saying that its volunteers are monitoring the distribution.

    I also read that half of the population does not have water connection. Does Delhi have enough water to provide to all? What will happen to those households who have home-based small enterprise? It looks like they will end up in paying the same amount if not more.

    I really would like AAP to come with a detail strategy document, discussing all these aspects. Hope someone from AAP is reading these comments here and possible provide us more information than populist slogans and actions.

    Yes, I am aware that it is just a beginning for AAP. But if we don't present these questions, it may end up in becoming one more political party.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • 1. "upper slab water

    1. "upper slab water consumption will now be subsidised"
    Reality: everyone upto this level usage will be subsidsed, which is almost equal to the CPHEEO guidelines on water usage in urban areas.
    2. AAP water policy encourages you to use water meter, which the state govt will facilitate, at least they have promised in principle.
    3. the question of 30% population in JJ clusters is a larger problem of social inequalities in urban areas, fused with a higher degree problem of housing to the low income groups (low income due to various historical, cultural and economic circumstances)
    THIS IS NOT THE inefficiency of the AAP promise, or the fallibility in the promise itself, but a larger problem. It should not be confused with, here.
    4. According to Census of India 2011, the population of the state of Delhi, is 16.78 million and not 22 million .
    5. ÔÇ£According to the AAP promise, every person would get 140 LPCD which including the leakage would stand at approximately 175 LPCD.ÔÇØ
    This is ridiculous. First you crib about a dozen irregularities, and now you consider the leakage.
    a new govt. like AAp in Delhi shouldbe critiqued from the moment it assumes office, but with correct and relevant facts issues, and it should be critiqued, not lambasted.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply