Sunita

Narain

Director General of Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) and the Editor of Down To Earth magazine. She is an environmentalist who pushes for changes in policies, practices and mindsets

Weather is 2017 person of the year

The biggest headline of 2017 is not deadly air pollution, but the catastrophe of weather changes that are bringing distress across India’s rural areas

As I see it, the 2017 “person” of the year is weather. And the face of 2017 is the farmer, who has borne the brunt of weather changes, from unseasonal rain to drought. This is the year when India had drought at the time of flood and flood at the time of drought. This is the time of seasons of despair and it is time we recognised this so that we can respond—better and faster.

But this “weather” headline has been lost in the cacophony of our news. We don’t get to read this often enough because of three reasons. One, because the change is not yet recognised; scientists who measure weather are still uncertain and tentative of the world around them. They want to play safe. Two, because we have no way of listening to voices that are not established and based on so-called “good science”. In this way, the view of the farmers who are seeing change happening is dismissed; or just not heard.

Then there is the fact that they don’t know the fancy word of climate change. For them weather is weather and it is changing for the worse. Three, we do not hear this headline often because it only screams when it affects the cities, the middle-classes or when farmers have to die or something really severe has to happen before it makes it to news. This news is about everyday events—the gradual change that we are seeing. This news is about remote places and people. This news is not our news.

But it needs to be. This is why, in my view, the biggest headline of 2017 is not the toxic and deadly air pollution in our cities—which is bad, very bad. But it is not half as bad as the catastrophe of weather changes that are bringing widespread human grief and distress across India’s rural areas.

It is time that policy recognised the strife and understood that this is about a new normal—a normal where nature has turned against people. This “normal” is because we have abused nature; burnt fossil fuels to build our economies and our wealth and that these emissions have today turned weather to be different and devastating.

So, 2017 is about the contradictions that will plague us more and more in 2018. Consider how in some parts of the country, the agrarian crisis was about plenty as crop production was good. But farmers were still in trouble. Why? Because the glut meant that there was no value for their crop. But this was not only a story of plenty. The fact is that this “plenty” came after seasons of bad yield, because of rain-failure; or variable and extreme weather. This is why it was the proverbial last straw that broke the camel’s back. After many seasons of despair, farmers finally got a bumper crop; they could have made good their losses and paid back their loans. But now there was no price for their produce.

This is not an anomaly. The anomaly is the new normal.

Today, it is our tragedy that our farmers are the victims of two global processes—call them the true “foreign hands”. One, the failure of the climate change negotiations to mitigate emissions at a scale and pace that would not impact the world’s poorest. Two, the failure of the global trade negotiations to give the poorest and the most marginalised of the world a fair deal. Instead, global trade regimes have painted them as a hindrance to global fair trade practices.

Our real tragedy is that we have lost our voice. We cannot even take these issues to the global stage and argue our case. The question is why. It is because the global media is out of our reach—the bubble world is about its own intolerance and its own positions. It has no place for positions that come from out of this space. It is because our research is inadequate. The social media created news space ensures that these inconvenient stories do not make it to our world. It is time in 2018 we discussed this challenge.

This is not to say that urban India is not similarly affected by either weather changes or pollution. There is no urban and rural divide in this matter. But what is clear is that the urban crisis—of everything from housing, water, sewage, garbage and of course pollution—will only increase the rural crisis. As the agrarian crisis exacerbates—because of weather and all the other things that we do not do to fix it—people will move to cities in search of employment. The rural and urban is conjoined. There is no divide. This is the challenge of 2018.

2017: the year in extreme weather

2017: the year in extreme weather

2017 brought wild, wacky and even deadly weather. Australia was hit by heatwaves and torrential rains; hurricanes hit America and a killer monsoon lashed Asia

Rare takes on the year just passing by

Rare takes on the year just passing by

Being a Down To Earth reporter entails merging the personal with the professional. The magazine you so dearly own has a fascinating world hidden behind the pages.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • "This is not an anomaly. The anomaly is the new normal." -- it is not so, the basic problem is with poor governance and bad agricultural technology. When we look at the histogram of rainfall under different ranges, it clearly shows the variations with space and time and such analysis allows adaptation which our forefathers followed.

    Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy

    Posted by: Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy | 5 months ago | Reply
  • In my simplistic view the basic reason even informed people are helpless to concretely counter these predictable climate changes and ramifications is because of the failure of representative democracy. Our MPs and MLAs are elected for five years and then there is total disconnect between the electors and elected. Were it otherwise, how come that to the hundreds of very sensible articles, like this one, written in papers and magazines and with a vibrant Social Media, we get NO RESPONSE from the elected? especially Ministers of Central and State governments? It is because neither Parliament nor the state Assemblies truly represent the people, rural or urban. And it is clear that in our present corrupted election system getting 'concerned' politicians elected has a long, long way to go.

    Posted by: Vinay Tandon | 5 months ago | Reply
Scroll To Top