Friday 12 October 2012

Author(s): Sugandh Juneja

Gentle on critical pollution

After declaring 43 industrial areas in India as critically polluted and imposing a moratorium on their expansion, the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests is going easy on them. As many as 23 critically polluted areas have been removed from the moratorium list since last October on the basis of inadequate action plans submitted by the respective states. Non-profit Centre for Science and Environment evaluated the pollution status of two such places—Vapi in Gujarat and Cuddalore in Tamil Nadu. It found that pollution in these chemical hubs continues to exceed norms, putting a question mark on the ministry’s intent to tackle pollution. An analysis of pollution data by Sanjeev Kumar Kanchan. Ankur Paliwal reports from Vapi and Sumana Narayanan from Cuddalore.

Gentle on critical pollution

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Mercury is not the only

    Mercury is not the only pollutant from fossil fuel plants (FFPs). The main pollutant is CO2, for which there is no proven technology available as remedy. The effects of global warming are and will be more disastrous and long/centuries-lasting, as against the radiation hazards from nuclear power stations. The more harmful radioactive elements like Iodine have very short life, while those that last for thousands or billions of years give very minimal radiation in say the 100 years of human life span. The spread of these is also on very limited geographical scale as copmared to the global warming effects of FFPs. Also the pollutiion from the FFPs goes on for 24 hours, day in and day out, during normal working of the plants, no accident being necessary, while the radiation hazards from NPSs occurs almost only after an accident. Such accidents are rare and are getting rarer as the technology improves.
    Environmental activists like Down To Earth are harming the environment by opposing these plants.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • It is the (DTE, 31st Oct.

    It is the (DTE, 31st Oct. 2012 on IndiaÔÇÖs Minamata) clear cut violation of balancing the availability and exploitation of natural resources. It is the model of Business to Business (B2B) with out bothering for the health & wealth of the People & Environment. This is one of the key reason for apposing the developmental works by the affected PAPs in general and particularly the mining of natural resources.


    The need of the hour is to shift towards Business to People (B2P) by balancing the quantity & mode of exploitation of natural resources with the health & wealth of the People & Environment.

    Technologies like: Geological, Geophysical including the GIS & GPS are well established and proven their utility at all the stages covering: mapping, planning, exploitation, monitoring, evaluation with matching scope for taking measures at the right time which expects to save time, energy and money. Finally, the whole process is in the hands of the people and can be planned effectively for keeping the balance between the exploitation of the natural resources and the health & wealth of the People & Environment. I have been associated in this process covering major part of our Country and now associated with the community for creating sustainable solutions.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Welcome Sugandh and once

    Welcome Sugandh and once again I congratulate you for the efforts you made in bringing the facts before the readers. Yes I know about the techniques, but alas, we hardly care for the safety of the populace. Wish your efforts bring results!

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Dear Prashant I could not

    Dear Prashant

    I could not agree more with you. With Mahan now being opened for coal mining the other adjoining areas will also go one-by-one.
    I guess the government could not resist Essar and Hindalco. But the bigger question to ask is how much coal do we really need?
    Do we need so much that we give up such pristine forests? With Coal India Limited already sitting on 64 billion tonnes of coal
    reserves but producing only about 450 million tonnes, who is to be blamed? And why do we need more coal blocks being cleared in
    forest areas?

    Check this: http://www.cseindia.org/content/cse-disagrees-with-finance-ministry-says-no-need-national-investment-board-nib

    Thanks

    Posted by: Sugandh Juneja | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Dear Vaivhav It is indeed

    Dear Vaivhav

    It is indeed horrifying to know that the government has been silent about such a serious problem which can have devastating impact if left unchecked. The reason that the people have not yet raised voices I believe is because the effects of mercury exposure take a while to appear.
    Let us hope his study will stir a few governmental thought processes in the right direction.

    Thanks

    Posted by: Sugandh Juneja | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Dear Dr Arvind I appreciate

    Dear Dr Arvind



    I appreciate your comment. This is a preliminary study and I agree that more comprehensive sampling is needed to obtain very robust and accurate results. I do hope the UP government will take heed and carry out the extensive study soon especially with the mega fishery project planned.



    Thanks

    Posted by: Sugandh Juneja | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Dear Mr Joshi Thank you for

    Dear Mr Joshi



    Thank you for posting. For me it was very important to bring forth the point that thermal power plants do have issues on a number of accounts but as far as mercury goes we do have control technologies available. The sad part is no one in India is using these as no one is bothered. For companies to take mercury seriously, there need to be government mandated standards for mercury. Only then can we expect the companies to work towards reducing this toxin.



    Renewable energy sources are a welcome change but even these need to be planned carefully. It should not be a situation like Sonbhadra where already some 13,000 MW of power capacity has been stalled and many more is planned. The poor planning essentially exhibits a lack of understanding of cumulative impact of such power capacity in one district on the environment and people.



    Thanks

    Posted by: Sugandh Juneja | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Good cover story, best of

    Good cover story, best of luck

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • With forest clearance given

    With forest clearance given for Mahaan coal block, situation will worsen once pristine forest gives way to a coal mine. Singrauli district which till about 50 years ago was a land having some of the most dense forests in India is now has been reduced to dusty coal patch and its famed greenery is now fragmented and on its way to total destruction.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Well, I am not against Solar

    Well, I am not against Solar power or in favour of nuclear Power. My contention is that any source of energy is full of risks. Secondly the cost of generating solar power and its maintenance cost as of now are not favourable for large scale production. Our Nuclear Plants are not a state secret, but yes entry is regulated to keep a check on the visits of unscruplous elements and also for the reasons of human safety. This I am telling you after a recent rip to one of the power stations, where a detailed study was made of the precautions against hazards etc. Still I am not praising all that, because a hazard is something that can not be predicted, only precautions can be taken. My main argument is what do we do? Nuclear is hated by us for reasons best known to us, Thermal power problem has already been enumerated in the article. The lobbyists against dams are saying no no to hydropower-then what is the alternative?
    Power generation is in the hands of the Government and we can only cry hoarse here, but we cant veto a particular mode of power generation. Mind you Sir, in the government every one is not dishonest and also before launching sensitive projects lots and lots fo studies are done. But I agree that failures and accidents do happen even then.
    But what is the solution?

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Solar needs acres and acres

    Solar needs acres and acres of land? Quite the opposite. We can at least begin with rooftops, as have so many other parts of the world. Even micro-solar now costs about Rs 150,000 per kW. Enough examples abound in India as well.

    Gas too is a much cheaper option than nuclear.

    We can discuss 'statistics' only if the data is given out; as of now nuclear power installations are a state secret.

    Instead of just accepting what politicians and lobbyists want us think, let's not overlook the fact that North America and Europe have put up a stop to nuclear, while it's mostly the third world gullibles like India that are rushing in.

    Industrial holocausts, when they happen, have horrific scopes and consequences: Chernobyl was no domestic gas cylinder explosion or firecracker; neither was Bhopal, for that matter.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Ah! This is horrifying to

    Ah! This is horrifying to know. How can the government be quite about all of this. Mercury poisoning is one of the world calamities that can occur in an area. The government must be ashamed!

    Vaivhav

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Really alarming,stunned to

    Really alarming,stunned to note that mercury levels in Fish of Rihand reservoir is high. But more samples from different places should have been taken to ascertain it. u.P Government is going to establish a mega-fish cage culture project there-In context to your survey report concerned stakeholders must think twice to begin this mega fishery project over there.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
  • Kudos to Sugandh for the

    Kudos to Sugandh for the expose. People are dead against nuclear energy in India, while they remain blissfully ignorant about the perils of thermal power. If we have to develop we need power. It is easier said than done to install solar and wind power as both of them need acres and acres of land to generate power-from where do we get land from! The future technology may be able to reduce the size of the solar panels considerably to make them much less land invasive. But till then what do we do?
    The protagonists of Ganga are shouting hoarse to stop building dams across Ganga in Uttarakhand, about the nuclear energy protests the lesser said the better. But if you take a world statistics you find that minimum number of humans have suffered from radiation accidents from nuclear plants-but since we are scared of their use, we generate a hype about it.
    People may not agree with me but I still feel and reiterate that for the present a nuclear option is the best option to supplement our power generation and in future as soon as solar panel designs are improved we should change over to solar power.
    As far accidents are concerned then we should be more scared of the domestic gas and the match box in our pockets!

    Posted by: Anonymous | 3 years ago | Reply
Scroll To Top