From protests to where in 2012?

By Sunita Narain
Last Updated: Thursday 11 June 2015

image2011’s person of the year, according to Time magazine, is “the protester”. Clearly, this is the image that has captured the world—from dissent against the lack of democracy and repression in large parts of West Asia to anger against economic policies in vast and disparate parts of the world. People, all over, are saying enough is enough. But what will happen to these voices in the coming years? Will the movements of protesters be enough to change the way the world runs its business? Do these movements even know what they want?

It is important to understand that there are similarities and yet huge differences in protest movements against economic policies in the rich and the getting-rich world. The US-born Occupy Wall Street movement’s slogan is “we are the 99 per cent who will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1 per cent”. The movement, which began in New York and then spread across many states, has been squelched in many places by aggressive city governments. But protesters say they will be back. They will overcome.

It is difficult to gauge how this will pan out in the coming year. The movement prides itself in being leaderless and people-powered. It has no manifesto and no actionable agenda on how Wall Street must be reformed or how the global economy must be restructured so that it can meet the needs of all. In this way, it is easy to dismiss this movement as just one more protest that will go nowhere. It is not the Arab Spring, but the American Winter that will prevail.

But there is another possibility. The fact is that this movement—as with many similar movements in the rich-but-economically-troubled world—has struck a chord. Today, the same rich world, which was secure in its consumption and comfort, is finding the going tough. Things it took for granted are no longer easily available—from homes and medical facilities to education and jobs. Ordinary people are being hit by what governments call necessary austerity measures. They are hitting back in every way they can.

In Atlanta, the occupy-our-home movement wants to take over houses of people who will be thrown out by banks because of default in mortgage payments. It says the current assessment of property values is too high and banks have too much power to throw out people, even if they default on one payment. In Washington, the occupy-the-vote-DC movement is demanding electoral representation for the federal city. The list goes on.

These movements represent many uncomfortable and inconvenient issues that are refusing to go away. The rumbling that began in mid-2008 with the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers has become a roar as more banks and national economies collapse. This is in spite of governments doing all they can to portray that they have arrested the financial collapse. The problem is that the world’s economic managers do not believe there is any real option to restructure economies so that they consume less, pollute less and still grow in wellbeing if not in wealth. The problem is that we are wedded to this one ideology of growth. It is for this reason that in spite of all the perturbations and upheavals, the same people who have put us in this place continue to be in charge of fixing the problems of growth. It is no wonder that the protest movements are also on the rise. And even if they do not have the answers to the problems, they know that the current policies are not working. Their anguish reminds us that real change must happen, tomorrow or the day after.

The movements of protests in the emerging world are of many kinds and by many kinds of people. On the one hand, we have protests happening on the streets of urban India against corruption. This has certainly captured popular imagination and media attention. But there are many more protests—mutinies against displacement and pollution across the country—we rarely hear about and forget too soon.

These movements of small groups of people fighting for survival are real and intensifying. In a democracy there will be some hearing. Many of these protests—against land acquisition, water takeover, mining, dams, power projects or pollution—are getting some measure of official response. This is not to say that every protest will be successful. Far from it. But it is also a fact that these movements represent voices that are asking for different ways of development. These movements stand for rights to land, water, forest and mineral resources. And, as I have written before, these movements are collectively teaching us that we will have to build different pathways for economic growth that is inclusive and sustainable.

Therefore, even if these protest movements do not have a ready blueprint for future economic model, they have enough practice of prompting us to think of different ways. Most importantly, these movements are a response to real survival threats. They are here to stay until we find big answers to the big questions they raise.

This is then the challenge of 2012 and beyond. The world is on the boil and the steam of anger will not dissipate. The question is whether these protests can be channeled to etch new, better pathways of growth.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • >>> "...This is then the

    >>> "...This is then the challenge of 2012 and beyond. The world is on the boil and the steam of anger will not dissipate. The question is whether these protests can be channeled to etch new, better pathways of growth." <<<

    Isn't this problem - that we've "grown" and "grown" and outgrown the world/earth???

    I think we need to look at ways to stop "growing" - and seek solutions therein.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 9 years ago | Reply
  • Dr. Delighted to read

    Dr. Delighted to read -arguably one of the best editorials. Your editorial should be carried in all newspapers in the world.

    Best wishes to The New Year

    Posted by: Anonymous | 9 years ago | Reply
  • I am completely in agreement

    I am completely in agreement with this school of thought.Movements like these, even if not potential enough to pierce in the desired revolution, but ceratinly is essential to ignite the different way of thinking.

    In the democratic world, where "Development" has become subjective, one needs to really pause and rehink on the paths we are following.
    Corruption, unemployment, poverty and many more, if not addressed on time, are capable of establishing permenant scars on the face of development. Hence they need to be certainly looked into,with utmost priorities ,to make the development Environmentally JUST and Sustainable.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 9 years ago | Reply
  • Its not enough that we

    Its not enough that we protest. A party with no financial aspirations should be floated and we should have leaders with impeccable character to lead.We should have an aim. A clean and green India where consumerism does not rule should be the aim.If peoples demands can be reduced corruption and pollution will decrease.When demand increases industrial production and attendant demands increase and officials increase their rate of corruption along with this.So people should learn do lower their consumption of all products including food to save the country.They also should actively partake in politics and bring up a party that will cater to their needs.We need a party like the Green Party in the European Countries

    Posted by: Anonymous | 9 years ago | Reply
  • Very Good Analysis. I feel

    Very Good Analysis.
    I feel the answers lie in the author's line - "They are here to stayThey are here to stay until we find big answers to the big questions they raise."
    Big Powers (National Powers; Corporates and Multi-national NGO's) desire the Status Quo to continue which is obviously structured to benefit them. If they have sense and foresight they would compromise. Alternatively if they want to continue with the high exploitation model, and quell any opposition. then the people's misery has to rise to an even higher pitch. At this point a Big Response emerges which then has to tear asunsder the existing Status Quo. The question is - would the Powers within the current system be ready to compromise and evolve to a better system or would they resist till the people are forced to opt for upheavel?
    I just hope that when the upheavel happens, the people have developed the answers. They have visualized a system to replace the existing system.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 9 years ago | Reply
  • Great editorial....Happy New

    Great editorial....Happy New Year

    Posted by: Anonymous | 9 years ago | Reply
  • The collapse of Lehmann

    The collapse of Lehmann brothers, the GFC and the European debt crisis are all signs of the imminent collapse of capitalism as we know it. So says George Souros for one.

    It is a case of overshooting ecological carrying capacity combined with rampant greed and global inequality.

    The challenge for 2012 is how are we to survive the turmoil which will inevitably follow this collapse, defend the natural environment and human rights. This is a crisis in the classic Chinese sense of both "danger and opportunity".

    We urgently need more victories in the struggle to define development as one of human rights not a process of environmental destruction.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 9 years ago | Reply