The Western Ghats is recognised as a global biodiversity hotspot. In the past, many large development projects including highways, railway lines, mega dams, nuclear plants and mines have intruded into this biodiversity treasure trove. Lack of knowledge and absence of effective watchdogs contributed to the ad-hoc manner in which such projects were approved.
Today, habitat fragmentation and its consequent 'edge effects' have been scientifically recognised as the primary cause for the destruction of biodiversity rich forests. Yet, we continue to persist with a myopic, short-term exploitation perspective, which fails to recognise the immense and diverse long-term value of biodiversity rich landscapes.
In the absence of a clear land use policy, many development projects are pushed through without proper scrutiny.While projects like big dams and mining are more carefully scrutinised, those branded as 'clean and green' sneak in through the approval process. They then infiltrate into ecologically fragile landscapes and cause huge negative impacts. Environment impact assessments (eias) though mandatory, lack teeth. They are further reduced to a farce by eia consultants who masquerade as environmentalists. The reports they rustle up are bereft of data. So projects get approved without proper analysis of their impacts.
Wind power and mini-hydel (run-of-the-river) projects are increasingly touted as clean energy. The government has extended massive subsidies--around 90 per cent--to encourage them. The Karnataka Renewable Energy Department (kredl) has approved more than 250 mini-hydel projects.
Around 50 of these mini-hydel projects are located in the ecologically fragile Western Ghats, right in the middle of large blocks of contiguous forests. A direct consequence of such mini-hydel projects is fragmentation of contiguous swathes of pristine rain forests. This directly affects foraging movements and dispersal, and drastically reduces long-term population viability of extinction prone species like elephants, tigers and lion-tailed macaques, while aggravating human-wildlife conflicts.
Like in mini-hydel projects, the subsidy-driven regime is a boon for promoters. The rush to establish wind farms is more for 'harnessing' the subsidies rather than wind power. After that happens, the project changes hands or is even abandoned in some cases, scarring the landscape.
In spite of these well-documented ecological impacts, policy-makers and some activists brand such projects as "environment friendly". One such project has even claimed benefits under the clean development mechanism, ensuring its financial viability. Is generating emission free energy more valuable for carbon sequestration than protecting tropical rain forests? Let's not forget that the latter are crucial carbon-dioxide sinks? Is such clean power really 'green'? The answer is too obvious.
Praveen Bhargav is a conservationist and a Trustee of Wildlife First, Bangalore
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.