The Indian Science Congress like its political counterpart, the Indian National Congress owes its origin to a British initiative. In 1914 two British chemists J L Simonsen and P S MacMahon laid the foundations of the Indian Science Congress Association (isca), the body that conducts the annual science congress in January every year. The first meeting of the Congress was held on January 15-17 1914 at the premises of the Asiatic Society, Calcutta, with Ashutosh Mukherjee as president. By the time this magazine goes to press the 94th science congress would have concluded in Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu.
Over the span of nearly a century the science congress has grown into a mega event attended by nearly ten thousand practitioners of science including some thousand students. There are fourteen sections, encompassing various branches of science and over a thousand papers are read.The presence of highbrow vips adds a touch of high drama to the opening sessions.
All the hoopla notwithstanding, the meet has more of congress and less of science in it. The participants are middle-class teachers or government-employed scientists, many of them accompanied by their family and friends. For them the event is an escape from drudgery.
The train fares are paid by employers, the registration is inexpensive and the food an exciting change. The so-called research that is read out during the science congress is below par, even by humble Indian standards. The major attractions are the plenary lecture sessions which bring together giants in the field of science and their presentations are often rhetorical reviews of their life-time achievements. A new idea (which is what any scientific gathering most cherishes) hardly ever surfaces during the deliberations.
Recently, the science congress has apparently moved up in the esteem of many delegates, chiefly for the technical and organisational efficiency enabled by technology.
The presentations have moved up from the overhead projector to Microsoft PowerPoint. More halls are air-conditioned, and more delegates fly their way to the destination. But the substance of science has actually declined, and is falling alarmingly.
More alarmingly, the truly-motivated have all chosen to remain silent, leaving the reins to the politically savvy, mediocre opportunists that prey upon the system. These reasons have been so often cited that such complaints have been reduced to clichs.Ironically, we had Nobel class scientists in British India, but none today!
India has an abundant number of activists working for the protection of minorities, women, children, animals and the environment. But when it comes to protecting the interests of science, there seem to be none. What we need is activism in science too, which must expose the absurdities and fallacies in the prevailing system. Only then can we have less of congress and more of science in our academic community.
M K Unnikrishnan is at the Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.