Climate Change

Climate proxies can effectively mobilise public action and tackle climate change

These proxies work for everyone as people use them based on their age-group, understanding and even geographical location

 
By Anandita Sabherwal
Last Updated: Friday 19 July 2019
Climate proxies can effectively mobilise public action and tackle climate change. Photo: Getty Images

During the recent Chennai water crisis, the social media was flooded with posts on climate change. One tweet read: “Chennai is drying up, climate crisis is here,” another Facebook user posted: “Chennai water shortage is proof we need to tackle climate change.” For many in the public, the water crisis became a proxy to the bigger, more dispersed, climate crisis.

Such proxies are established symbols people use to understand and represent climate change:

  • Increase in temperature
  • Decrease in snowfall
  • Early onset of spring
  • Altitudinal shifts in the distribution of species
  • Several plant species flowering earlier than usual
  • Increased soil salinity
  • Pollution
  • Reduced crop yield
  • Scarcity of resources

These proxies work for everyone as people use them based on their age-group, understanding and even geographical location.

According to researchers in Tibet, the elder tend to use long-term proxies such as changes in snow fall and biodiversity over the course of their lives. The young, on the other, focus more on short-term effects such as increase in dry spells or hurricanes within a few years.

A 2019 study in the Sundarbans found that those in the same locality were likely to have similar perceptions of environmental change.

According to Bansari Guha, one of its authors, when people share a natural feature such as a river, their climate proxies are shaped by changes in that feature.

For example, unexpected floods in a river will appear to be signals of changing climate to all communities living around that river.

Another factor determining people’s climate proxies is their urban or rural context. Researchers have observed that those in rural areas tend to have more varied proxies, derived from their observations of a changing ecosystem and habitats.

Urban populations, in contrast, observe more indirect effects of climate change such as rising prices of food, air pollution, and crowding.

Proxies guide research

Given that the climate proxies people have are so varied, it has often been questioned whether they can be used by various stakeholders in the field of climate change.

Yes, says research. Gathering the locals’ perceptions of environmental change helps researchers understand the ecosystem, and communicate with locals about climate change.

“When I started work in the Sundarbans 30 years ago, locals didn’t know what ‘climate change’ or its Bengali translation meant,” says Guha. Climate proxies came in handy in this situation.

Asking locals about the changes in natural features around them such as tides, rainfall, and soil salinity allowed Guha to understand the ecosystem of the Sundarbans, and recognise the locals’ environmental concerns.

Locals’ climate proxies are trustworthy sources of information that can also suggest future directions for research.

Kamal Bawa’s research on perceptions of climate change in the Himalayas found that climate proxies of the locals — rising temperature, decreasing biodiversity, increase in rainfall, etc — were consistent with scientific evidence of such changes.

Since the locals’ proxies have been found to be accurate, future research can now test other locally endorsed, but untested, proxies such as increase in human diseases, and investigate solutions for these local concerns.

Climate proxies also help researchers and activists communicate climate change-related concerns to community members.

Activists say the biggest challenge is to explain people why climate change is a problem. “The climate is changing… so what?” many ask.

To increase people’s concern about climate change and effectively answer the “so what”, activists must understand people’s climate proxies, and communicate the effects of climate change in terms of direct impacts on people’s lives.

For example, if low crop yield is a top local concern, activists can communicate to farmers how climate change specifically impacts crop yield. By drawing the link between crop-yield, and climate change, activists can rouse concern among farmers about the effects of climate change.

“When we discuss changes in the weather, drought, or even an increase in vegetable prices, we realise the importance and personal impact of changing climate,” says Jason Davis, who researches climate proxies in Tibet.

Once people become concerned about climate change, they are more likely to demand change. “When a farmer sees droughts or air pollution or feels suffocated, s/he understands something is wrong, and realises that the system must change,” says activist Wilfred D’costa, involved with the Indian Social Action Forum.

Motivate policy change

If communicating the impact of climate change using climate proxies helps generate concern and a desire to act, it is quite possible to use them to change policy.

Field researchers have identified huge gaps between locals’ and policy makers’ perceptions. While locals view environmental issues such as air pollution, low yield and soil salinity as climate proxies, policy makers might see these as mere inconveniences.

According to Guha, activists can bridge the gap between locals’ and policymakers’ concerns by first gathering information about locals’ climate proxies and then conveying them to decision makers.

“Activists should step in to generate concern about climate change among locals, and organise them to collectively put pressure on the panchayats and senior decision makers so that they make policy decisions keeping local concerns in mind,” she says.

If climate proxies can indeed convey local concerns to policy makers, why haven’t they been used to affect policy change so far?

“Not much work has been done to understand local environmental concerns; that’s why they haven’t reached policy makers,” Guha says. She has a solution: “Activists should be born from the soil. If they come from outside, they should collaborate with locals to first understand their concerns.”

So, it is by understanding climate proxies that activists and community members can enact policy change that tackles the specific effects of climate change that locals struggle with.

Researchers and activists should hence systematically record people’s climate proxies. Once analysed, these proxies can help researchers understand the impacts of climate change and enable activists to design specific messages for various communities to effectively motivate collective action on climate change.

The views expressed here are the author’s own and does not necessarily reflect that of Down To Earth’s

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.