Months after disaster struck Uttarakhand, government has done little to improve people’s lives
Pradeep Singh Dami’s two-storied house in Tawaghat village in Uttarakhand’s Pithoragarh district fell like a pack of cards on June 17, when the raging Kaliganga river knocked off a chunk of the hill beneath his house. Dami had small savings so he rented a room in Dharchula town, about 20 km from Tawaghat. Once a shopowner, he is now a shop assistant and can barely feed his family of five.
Dami does not curse his fate but he is very angry with the administration. “My newly constructed house collapsed. The administration had sanctioned it. Now I am told that my village is one of the many the Uttarakhand government has marked to be resettled. The land here is unstable, it says. Why did the government sanction the building plan if it knew this?”
But very few are as fortunate as Dami to have received compensation. Kamal Singh of the same village loaned Rs 20,000 to claim compensation for his house. He spent all the money visiting government offices, but has still not received the amount. His neighbour Ram Singh Khela got a cheque of Rs 200,000 as compensation for the two houses he lost. But it is of no use to him as he does not have a bank account to get it encashed. He lost all the documents required to open an account along with his houses.
Three months after disaster struck Uttarakhand, its government is still struggling to repair its roads. The arterial road that connected Darma valley with Dharchula sub-division is still damaged. Every day people precariously walk on loose debris that may have once been someone’s house.
| BIG PROMISES
- June 20, 2013: Centre announces Rs 1,000 crore for Uttarakhand. Rs 147 crore is released immediately. Prime Minister assures Rs 200,000 to kin of deceased, Rs 100,000 to those who lost their homes from National Disaster Response Fund
- June 21: Rural development minister Jairam Ramesh promises Rs 340 crore to rebuild village roads
- June 25: Tourism minister Chiranjeevi promises Rs 1 crore to state
- June 26: Chief Minister Vijay Bahuguna announces Rs 100,000 to kin of chopper crash victims
- June 27: Agricultural land damage relief: Rs 5,000 per nali (10 hectare appx) and Rs 6,000 for dead cattle
- June 30: Bahuguna admits at least 3,000 people were killed
- July 1: Bahuguna bans construction along the rivers
- July 2: Construction of 19 bridges to connect rural areas ordered
- July 3: Supreme Court asks state to file affidavit on disaster
- July 6: Bahuguna admits slow progress in rehabilitation and relief work, reshuffles officials
- July 7: Government decides to dig tunnel in Sirobagar; National Disaster Response Force deployed
- July 10: Prime Minister forms Cabinet committee; Bahuguna says rehabilitation to be supervised by prime minister
- July 12: Supreme Court gives state two weeks to file affidavit on rescue work in Uttarakhand
- July 14: Bahuguna announces villages under threat would be shifted to safer places
- July 15: Repair of Char Dham route within 15 days ordered
- July 27: Widows to be given Rs 25,000 to start business
- July 28: Illegal houses also to get compensation
- July 30: Kin of transport corporations to get permanent jobs
Ajit Singh Rongchu left his 30-year-old house in Sobla village damaged on the day of the disaster when he was air-lifted to safety. When rains subsided, he returned and built a small shelter with the tarpaulin provided by the government. “I have lost everything. How will I pay rent and feed my family?” he asks.
Didn’t chief minister Vijay Bahuguna promise Rs 3,000 as rent to those displaced in the disaster for a year? “We have not received anything. Some people got a small amount, but they bribed officials to get that. I do not have anything to bribe,” he says.
Rongchu’s neighbour Jaman Singh lives in a refugee camp in Dharchula Government College with his family of six. “First the government promised us pucca houses, now it promises house rents. We have received neither. There are a few people who get house rents, though only Rs 2,000 in two months. My fear is that the government will now shove us into tin shed camps.”
No rehabilitation policy
“Uttarakhand does not have a resettlement and rehabilitation policy. Whether people are displaced by dams or by disaster, the government always has to start from scratch,” says Ravi Chopra of Dehradun-based advocacy group People’s Science Institute.
On June 17, the day people were braving floods and landslides, the state government was announcing its first rehabilitation and resettlement policy for hydel projects. It claimed the policy was “the best in the country”. The government did nothing much after the announcement.
Almost 15 days after understanding the enormity of the disaster, the state government announced setting up of the Uttarakhand Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Authority, which would supervise the rebuilding and rehabilitation work in Rudraprayag, Chamoli, Uttarkashi, Tehri and Pithoragarh, the worst affected districts in the state. It was also given charge of handling disbursement of compensation.
It also announced sops such as Rs 500 to each student of intermediate college and school and Rs 1,000 to those in polytechnic and degree colleges. The Cabinet also announced it will take responsibility of all the orphaned children. However, all colleges in the disaster-affected districts are still closed, so the amount is of no use to the students. What’s more, according to government figures only 10 children were orphaned in the June 17 disaster.
According to official figures, about 600 villages were affected in the disaster. In 2010, the disaster-prone state had 243 vulnerable villages. The number rose to 550 in 2013. So after the disaster, 1,150 villages need rehabilitation. But till date, only Chhatikhaal in Rudraprayag district has been partially rehabilitated. Disaster Mitigation and Management Centre chief Piyush Rautela says, “Unpredictability of rainfall and unique geographical conditions of the state have made the rehabilitation exercise difficult. Hundreds of villages have been swept away. It will be naive to bind the exercise within a time-frame”.
State government officials blame the delay on lack of land. That’s not true, says social activist Purushottam Sharma. “The government has been quite generous in distributing land to corporate houses, builders, religious organisations and politicians. The chief minister has squandered away about 100,000 hectares (ha) in this manner,” he says.
When Uttarakhand was formed, the state had 5.6 million ha. Of this, 63 per cent was forestland, 14 per cent agricultural land and 23 per cent non-agricultural land. This means, the state had 1.2 million ha non-agricultural land, which could be used for rehabilitation. Of the 0.8 million ha agricultural land, government leased out thousands of hectares to industrialists. It also diverted about 7,567 ha to power projects, says Sharma.
“What the state government should do is strictly implement the Land Ceiling Act, form a land bank, and use it to rehabilitate the homeless,” he says.
But the state government is so unsure of its plans that it is constantly changing them. After facing flak from several quarters for not acting on time, the chief minister hurriedly announced pucca camps for the homeless. Soon authorities realised that families do not like to be displaced too many times. Moreover, they could claim land rights in future. So the government declared the scheme to distribute money for rent, says state rural development department official on condition of anonymity (see ‘Compensation enhanced’).
Now, the chief minister has announced that pre-fabricated houses will be set up at 19 locations for the homeless. According to Bahuguna, 70 to 100 families can be rehabilitated in one village which will have basic facilities such as a school, a hospital and a community centre. He claims that the life span of these houses is more than 35 years. The state government has already floated tenders for this, setting October 30 as the deadline.
The announcement not only confirms Jaman Singh’s fear of being pushed to a tin shed, but also threatens his survival. Singh used to earn his daily bread from his agricultural fields and cattle. “Government will give me a tent far from my village. It will neither give me land nor employment. How will I feed my children away from the place I belong to and away from my community?” he asks.
Enough funds in state’s kitty
State chief secretary Subhash Kumar says the Union Inter-Ministerial Group for rehabilitation of Uttarakhand has agreed to sanction Rs 6,687 crore to the state for its rebuilding and reconstruction projects. This is a part of the state government’s demand for Rs 13,800 crore assistance to rebuild the calamity-hit districts. The proposal was made on the basis of the estimates of losses.
This apart, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) would loan $30 million for tourism development, $95 million for highways and connecting roads, $10 million dollars solely for hill roads, $12 million for drinking water and $6 million for construction of drainage systems, says additional chief secretary Rakesh Sharma. The World Bank would loan $30 million for drinking water projects, $50 million for repair of damaged buildings, $20 million for irrigation and $23 million for technical support, he says. Together, ADB and World Bank will provide Rs 3,000 crore through their “crisis window” provision. This would be repaid in a ratio of 90:10 under which 90 per cent would be paid by the Union government and 10 per cent by the state government, he adds.
Apart from this, Rs 1,187 crore will be released for the National Disaster Response Force, Rs 1,500 crore from Centrally aided projects and another Rs 1,500 crore as additional Central aid.
Money does not seem to be falling short, but while the cries of help still echo in Uttarakhand, what seems lacking is its government’s inclination to bring life back to the state.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.