The draft National Environment Policy has little on coast management
Acursory perusal of the draft National Environment Policy (nep), 2004 indicates that we are inching towards a scientific approach in managing environmental matters in the country. Keeping aside sectoral considerations, the document stresses that poverty alleviation is essential for environment protection. But despite attempts to study the environment holistically, the draft nep disappoints us on many counts.
Take the case of managing coasts. The Coastal Regulation Zone Act of 1991 -- with a number of amendments -- does not promote either sustainability or hazard mitigation efforts. And, nep does nothing to redeem affairs. Coasts have not been categorised as per their resource potential, pollution threats or vulnerability to natural hazards. Considering the vastness of the problem -- including intricacies of various coastal stretches, fisheries exports, plight of the people who live around coast and prospects of natural hazards -- scientific management of coasts is the need of the hour. Shelters in the Florida coast, usa have helped millions during cyclonic storms. Do we have similar structures to protect the 250 million who live along the country's coasts? India with a mainland coastline of 5,422 kilometres (km) and islands with a coastline of 2,094 km can ill-afford such negligence. The recent tsunami has again showed the perils of leaving people to nature's ravages.
nep also has precious little on the nutrient loading problem in our water bodies and the surge of new diseases in the country's coastal-marshy belts. And this not all: there is nothing substantial to address the country's groundwater problem. Those looking for guidelines to characterise groundwater basins -- both in terms of quality and quantity -- and for some schemes to recharge groundwater by monsoon water, are also likely to be sorely disappointed.
Despite constant emphasis on a holistic approach to manage the environment, the draft nep ignores a critical fact: poverty alleviation and protection of the 'environment' cannot be achieved without reducing population. In other words, population policy is also necessary for a 'healthy environment'.
But then why cry hoarse over a document ? T he country lacks an agency that can manage the environment, scientifically. The union ministry of environment and forests (moef) is ill-equipped for this job. Matters can, however, be mended if the moef functions along lines of the us Environmental Protection Agency. It can take support of the national laboratories. Let us hope our authorities get into the act soon.
K Soman is a geologist with the Centre for Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.