How did the bike lane project start?
We called for the redesign of Prospect Park West in February 2009 to calm traffic in the street. A campaign was launched in which 1,300 people signed a petition asking the city’s transport department to replace one of the three lanes from the street with a protected two-way bike path. Community Board 6 endorsed the project and it was implemented in July 2010.
How valid are the allegations in the lawsuit?
The lawsuit has no merit. Facts do not support the allegations made in the lawsuit, and the alleged "compromises" they have put forth could put people at risk. The transport department has done sufficient community outreach, data collection and reporting for this project.
What are the repercussions of the lawsuit?
The lawsuit has fuelled a media bias against cycling. People opposing the bike lane are trying to show that something untoward is happening between officials of the transport department and bike proponents. On the other hand, the frivolousness of the lawsuit has also encouraged some people who were earlier not actively involved in the campaign to rally to the cause.
What is the motivation behind this lawsuit?
It represents an unwillingness to accept change. It is very clear that the people most vehemently opposed the bike path object because of the aesthetic change to Prospect Park West. I'm convinced they will eventually get used to it.
