After a week of negotiations the compliance working group has produced nothing but even lengthier texts and more brackets, in short, a complete farce.
What do you get after a week's negotiations by the joint working group on compliance? Even lengthier text with more brackets.
The compliance mechanism will have two branches - enforcement and facilitative. The rather audacious demand for larger representation of annex I parties in the enforcement branch has now been extended to the facilitative branch as well (see story: Polluters turned monitors, Equity Watch, Special Edition # 1, November 15). It is suggested that seven members in this branch are from annex I countries, and three are non-annex I.
Compliance procedures will now apply only to the Kyoto Protocol and not to commitments under the convention. It is currently proposed that the following articles come under the purview of the enforcement branch
Emission reduction targets (article 3.1)
Policies and measures undertaken at national level to meet commitments (article 2 and 3) *
Minimising adverse impacts of response measures on developing countries (article 3.14) *
National systems for estimation of emissions (article 5.1, 5.2) *
Communication of national inventories on emissions (articles 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4)
It is yet to be decided whether the decisions of the enforcement branch, which will have either 4 or 5 members, will be adopted by a majority of at least three quarters of the members of the branch present and voting. If the number of industrialised country representatives is higher in this branch, the compliance mechanism will be a complete farce - the defaulters will decide if they are to be punished!
No breakthrough has yet been achieved on what happens in case of non-compliance. One option is a pre-determined contribution into a compliance fund. The G77 has suggested that this should be equal to 60 per cent of the market value of one carbon tonne, multiplied by the total number of carbon tonnes by which the party has exceeded its assigned amount, or should be a determined number of dollars for each exceeded carbon tonne, whichever is greater. A 30-page text will now be forwarded for the ministerial negotiations.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.