Climate Change

With GCF becoming headless, future of global climate finance does not look promising

Howard Bamsey resigned abruptly after a 'disappointing' meeting on expansion of GCF-funded projects

 
By DTE Staff
Last Updated: Thursday 05 July 2018 | 09:39:19 AM
Credit: University of Michigan
Credit: University of Michigan Credit: University of Michigan

In yet another blow to the already tottering Green Climate Fund (GCF), Howard Bamsey, its executive director, stepped down abruptly on Wednesday, casting doubt on the organisation’s future. He reportedly resigned after a “difficult” four-day meeting in South Korea, during which no new projects were approved under the fund.

It was “a very difficult and disappointing board meeting for all of us, but most importantly for those people who are most vulnerable to climate change impacts, and who depend on the activities of the Fund,” says Lennart Bage, chairman of the GCF’s meeting. “Hopefully, it's a canary in the mine and not a nail in the coffin,” Jasmine Hyman, an environmental consultant at the British firm E Co told media.

Set up in 2010 up by the United Nations, GCF has, so far, committed to projects worth $3.7 billion aimed at reducing greenhouse gases and helping nations overcome the impact of climate change.

While Bamsey said that he is stepping down due to “pressing personal issues”, it is speculated that his decision was influenced by GCF’s failure to add to its portfolio of 76 projects. Bamsey’s mandate has been to expand the loans that GCF gives to developing nations for green projects, which range from promoting rooftop solar energy in India to helping Colombia safeguard wetlands.

Growing concern over depleting fund and red tapism

Instead of improving flow of climate finance, uncertainty over generation of fund has marred the importance of GCF. The fund, which initially received pledges from developing nations—$10.3 billion in 2014, suffered a major blow in 2017 when the US decided not to contribute to the fund as Trump thought  it was a waste of US taxpayers’ money. It reduced the GCF to $8 billion.

Bamsey’s resignation happened at a time when concerns over corruption possibly making inroads into GCF-funded projects have been raised. Experts have recommended putting in place “safeguards to avoid mismanagement and increase transparency” to prevent fraud, embezzlement and rigged bidding processes in procurement phase.

ALSO READ: The curious case of climate finance

Last year, India’s first project under GCF was approved. The project worth $34 million (Rs 1.4 billion) was aimed at enhancing groundwater recharge in community ponds in Odisha. In March this year, GCF approved $1.09 billion for 23 projects in vulnerable nations such as Bangladesh, Vietnam, Rwanda and Barbados. With the GCF becoming headless, issues like depleting fund and the need for fixing governance of GCF will remain on backburner.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Related Story:

Climate change will displace millions in coming decades; nations should prepare now to help them

Odisha gets GCF-approved climate change project

Pre-2020 action and climate finance need of the hour: BASIC

The truth behind developed nations' pledge to mobilise climate finance

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.