Environment

Why using microbes to clean contamination is good for us and nature

Microbes are increasingly being used to clean contaminated sites

 
By Aprajita Singh
Last Updated: Monday 10 July 2017
Oil spills, like this one in  Mexico, are hard to clean. That's why bioremediation is fast gaining ground (Photo: Reuters)
Oil spills, like this one in  Mexico, are hard to clean. That's why bioremediation is fast gaining ground (Photo: Reuters) Oil spills, like this one in Mexico, are hard to clean. That's why bioremediation is fast gaining ground (Photo: Reuters)

The oil spill that contaminated Chennai’s beaches in January this year had an unusual ecological takeaway. The spill was cleaned up using a technique called bioremediation. The technique works by making use of the natural ability of certain microorganisms to break down toxic compounds using enzymes. Enzymes are molecules present in these microorganisms that do the job of breaking down pollutants into non-toxic compounds, essentially getting rid of them by eating them.

Possibly considered one of the most inert and harmless of environmental clean-up techniques due to its use of near-natural processes, various techniques of bioremediation have gained considerable attention both in academic circles as well as with the public in the past three decades.

How it works

In a study published in Nature on March 27, researchers from the University of Wis-consin-Madison captured the process of one such enzyme attacking and breaking down toluene, an organic pollutant. Says Thomas Brunold, author of the study: “Broadly, these types of natural reactions are environment-friendly and cheap. In industry, researchers often perform challenging reactions with complex chemicals in harsh conditions, which can result in lots of waste and energy used. Investigating how enzymes, like the one we studied, catalyse their reactions can help us find more efficient ways to perform these challenging reactions.”

There are various methods of bioremediation. In Chennai, researchers from the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) used the ex-situ (off site) method. Ex-situ cleanup involves transporting the contaminated material for safe treatment away from the site of contamination. Bioremediation can also be carried out in-situ, making use of microorganisms at the site. Another method is bioaugmentation, where non-indigenous microbial species are added to a contaminated site to enhance the breakdown process (see ‘Clean acts’).

Bioremediation first got into popular scientific parlance following the Exxon-Valdez oil spill in Alaska in 1989, when millions of gallons of oil was spilled. When conventional methods failed to show any significant results, bioremediation trials, specifically the addition of fertilisers, were carried out. This resulted in enhanced activity of indigenous bacteria that biodegraded hydrocarbons, but the process slowed down once the readily available hydrocarbons were exhausted. Following successful field trials, bioremediation was deployed on a large-scale to clean up the spill. While an actual quantification is difficult, beaches that were treated with fertilisers were observed to be cleaner than those that weren’t.

Natural cleaners

Bioremediation is not just limited to cleaning oil spills. It has far-reaching applications in cleaning up contaminated soils, industrial wastewater, groundwater, mines, pesticide accumulated sites and fly ash disposal sites. The use of microorganisms in bioremediation is not limited to bacteria. Scientists have achieved considerable success in using fungi species such as Asper-gillus niger, A terreus, Cladosporium oxysporum and Mucor thermohyalospora to break down endosulphan, a highly toxic insecticide, into a non-toxic isomer.

Says Geoffrey Gadd of the University of Dundee, who has conducted extensive research on bioremediation, “Fungi are important components of the soil microbiota and are, therefore, involved in all the natural processes that may affect the chemical state of metal pollutants, as well as being very important in the degradation of xenobiotic compounds. Much of the current work is being done using fungi (and bacteria) for metal biorecovery and the production of useful biomineral or nanoparticle forms, but commercial exploitation has not happened yet.”

Indian researchers are also finding new pathways in bioremediation. A team from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras, succeeded in degrading samples of crude oil by up to 80 per cent within 10 days using Bacillus subtilis, a bacteria derived from a polymer dump site. While a combination of different groups of bacteria is generally required to break down crude oil—since each group is limited in the kinds of hydrocarbons they can act on—it was observed that B subtilis could be used to treat a wide range of hydrocarbons in the oil. The team was led by N Sakthipriya from the Environmental and Water Resources Engi-neering Division, IIT-Madras.

Laboratory trials have also demonstrated the successful use of electro- remediation in denitrification of soil, such as an experiment conducted on nitrate-rich soil in South Korea. The trials succeed in achieving 100 per cent efficiency in removing nitrates from soil samples, a significant finding especially for areas that practice input-intensive agriculture, where hyper- nitrification of soil and water due to overuse of fertilisers is a critical issue.

There is another technique that combines electrokinetics and bioremediation. Here, in-situ treatment of soil pollutants known as Hydrophobic Organic Com-pounds (HOCs), which include hard-to- remove compounds such as petroleum byproducts, herbicides and byproducts in chemical manufacturing, can be cleaned up. It remains to be seen if governments across the world fund further research, and more importantly, whether industries, both large and small, will use bioremediation to clean up their sites.

Clean acts
 
Techniques used in the past to clean contaminated sites
  • In-situ (ON SITE) METHOD - Uses microorganisms to treat contaminated material at the site, as was done in the Exxon-Valdez oil spill in 1989
  • Ex-situ (OFF SITE) METHOD - Transporting the contaminated material from the site of contamination and using microbes for treatment. Used by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited to clean up the Chennai oil spill this year
  • Bioaugmentation - Non-indigenous microbial species added to a contaminated site to enhance the breakdown process. Villalba de los Barros, a municipality in Spain, has been using this technique since 2012 to treat wastewater
  • Electro-remediation - Using microbes to remove nitrates from soil. Trials conducted in South Korea in 2009 to treat nitrate-rich soil
  • Electrokinetic BIOREMEDIATION - In-situ treatment of soil pollutants known as Hydrophobic Organic Compounds. Denmark used this technique in 2012 to degrade PCE, or Perchloroethylene, a soil contaminant

 This story was first published in the June 16-30, 2017 issue of Down To Earth magazine under the headline "Age of bioclean".

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
Related Stories

India Environment Portal Resources :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Nice study.
    Why did you not mention about the people scooped out the oils by buckets? #chennai_oil_spill. GoI has a lot of techniques to clean the oil spill. Why does the central govt not using it properly to clean the Chennai oil spill ? http://www.ndtv.com/chennai-news/chennai-vs-its-oil-spill-volunteers-with-gloves-scoop-up-thick-tar-1655666

    Posted by: Rajkumar | 2 years ago | Reply