- If you are not yet a Down To Earth subscriber, please click here to subscribe: Subscription
- If you are an existing Down To Earth subscriber, please log in to download digital archives.
Nature has proved to be much more successful in removing excess carbon monoxide from atmosphere
THE fear of being choked to death by a
smog of atmospheric carbon monoxide
(co) has prevailed ever since the beginning of the industrial revolution (New
Scientist, Vol 151, No 2045). The study
of co gas is important because the
levels of its emission are much more
than that of any other pollutant. Also,
high emission of co could use up the
available hydroxyradicals (free radicals), consequently reducing the ability
of this chemical to oxidise and remove
other pollutants like sulphur dioxide
and methane. It is also the main
cause of global warming and ozone
Studies conducted by Patricia Martineria and colleagues at the laboratory of Glaciology and Geophysics of the Environment in Saint Martin d'Heres, France, show that nature has been more efficient than expected in removing excess co from the atmosphere. There has not been any significant increase in global concentration of co during the industrial era although activities like the burning of coal and wood have doubled from one billon tonnes to 2.7 billion tonnes a year.
Estimates done in the '80s show that concentration of the gas in the atmosphere was only one-third the level present today and there has been a regular six per cent rise every year, thereby suggesting the positive role played by nature. But lately, scientists had to rework the idea that there is a firm link between the growing number of co emission sources and the rising concentration of the gas in the air.
It was found that co level in atmosphere dropped by more then 10 per cent between 19.90-1993. This erratic rise after 80's and fall between 1990-93 in concentration has still not been understood. Seeing this, some scientists have started assuming that all this sudden rise and fall may be linked to the impact of eruption of Mt Pinatubo in 199 1. But this forced researchers to assume that their extrapolation of concentrations based on data restricted to the past 40 years is faulty; which is, again, not possible since nature does play an efficient role in converting co to C02. The extrapolation suggested that concentrations of co in the northern hemisphere had risen from around 40 parts per billion (ppb) in the pre-industrial era to around 120 ppb today. But Martineria reported that the concentration of co in the atmosphere in the year 1802 was 92 ppb and thereafter it slowly rose to 110 ppb in 1947 (see graph). In Antarctica the concentration has remained constant, that is, 60 ppb for about 50 years, thus suggesting the efficient role played by nature.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.