Road map to save environment

A global map highlights regions where road construction will have high environmental costs

By Manupriya
Last Updated: Thursday 17 September 2015 | 10:08:27 AM

India plans to construct over 0.8 million kilometres of roads by 2025 to connect every habitat in the country, as per the targets outlined in the government's Rural Road Development Vision. Worldwide, 25 million kilometres of roads are proposed to be constructed by 2050—a 60 per cent increase in road length from 2010—and nine-tenths of this new construction is expected in developing countries such as India. But construction of roads often harms biodiversity and destroys wild habitat. To weigh the potential benefits associated with road construction against their environmental impact, William Laurance, professor at James Cook University, Australia, and colleagues conducted a study and came up with a map that can help policymakers take informed decisions on where to construct roads.

The map highlights regions where road constructions will have high environmental costs. It is based on two factors: environmental values and road benefits. Environmental values are measured by integrating global data on three classes of parameters: biodiversity, key wilderness habitats and carbon storage and climate-regulation services of the local ecosystem. The researchers assigned a value between zero and one to each part of the globe. Regions with sensitive environments and, therefore, high environmental value scored close to one on a scale of zero to one. Similarly, road benefits were defined on the basis of potential increase in agricultural production resulting from better connectivity offered by roads.

The two sets of data were combined to generate a global map where every square kilometre (sq km) has been assigned a colour (see map). Green areas are those where road building would have relatively high environ-mental costs and only modest potential benefits for agriculture, while red-shaded areas have a high potential to increase agricultural production and low environmental values. Large parts of the Indian subcontinent fall under this category. Black and dark-shaded areas are “conflict zones” with high values on both the parameters, whereas white and light-shaded areas are of lower priority for both environment and agriculture.

Red shades highlight areas where road construction will benefit agriculture and have minor environmental costs, while green shades denote areas where roads will have high environmental costs and low agricultural benefits

In countries such as Indonesia and Madagascar, which have been assigned “exceptional environmental value”, the authors suggest adoption of alternative methods, such as ecotourism and harvesting the forest produce, to meet economic development goals. The authors note that roads are being constructed or are planned in regions that have high environmental values but only modest agricultural potential. These regions include the Amazon Basin, parts of the Asia-Pacific region and high latitude forests in the Northern Hemisphere. The map also shows that regions where road making is environmentally feasible exist in every continent. In total 12.3 per cent of the global land area has been mapped red. These include parts of central Eurasia, the Irano-Anatolian region, African Sahel and the Indian subcontinent. The study was published in Nature on August 27.

What ails India

What does the study mean for countries such as India which the map says has a huge scope for constructing roads with minimal environ-mental impact? According to Laurance, road construction even in such areas will have environmental impact (see `Unplanned roads can cause a lot of damage'). There are several examples to show this. Sanjay Gubbi of Mysore-based non-profit Nature Conservation Foundation says 23 leopards have died in road accidents in Karnataka in the past five years. He says environmental impact assessments done before laying new roads often ignore ecological issues resulting in loss of biodiversity and animal habitat. But this can be easily avoided.

Gubbi worked with the state government to realign a part of the Mysore-Mananthavadi road passing through the Nagarahole Tiger Reserve. “The realigned road helps 'defragment' wildlife habitat in addition to providing connectivity to 11 villages,” he says.

`Unplanned roads can cause a lot of damage'
imageWilliam Laurance, professor at James Cook University, Australia, says though India has a lot of areas where road construction can benefit agriculture,it also has a number of exceptionally important environments where new roads can cause a lot of damage. Excerpts from an interview

In the global road map you have generated, a large part of India is marked feasible for road making. Does this mean India need not worry much about environmental issues before laying roads?

No, it is not that simple. Areas in red are where road benefits would be greatest and where environmental values are less pronounced. But even in such areas, roads can and will have environmental impacts. For instance, it has been shown that tigers in India can move across large areas of settled and semi-settled land between tiger reserves-dispersing hundreds of kilometresin some cases. With increasing roads and agricultural intensification, the settled lands between reserves will become more hostile for wildlife such as tigers.

Also, of course, India has a number of exceptionally important environments where new roads can cause a lot of damage. Some examples would include the country's national parks, rainforests of the Western Ghats, parts of the Himalayas, and tropical and higher-elevation forests in Arunachal Pradesh.

However, in broad terms our study does indicate that there is much potential in India to improve agriculture. Road improvements, such as paving, can contribute to agricultural productivity by better linking farmers with markets and making fertiliser and agricultural technologies more accessible.

Lack of infrastructure has been a big issue in India. What key issues should be kept in mind while planning new roads?

Our key points are that roads that penetrate into wilderness areas or parks can cause a great deal of environmental damage, and so one has to be very careful about planning new roads.

Our study tries, on a broad global scale, to underscore the kinds of situations where roads can be most harmful and where they can be most beneficial. Actual road planning will also need to incorporate local-scale information, because the global datasets we had access to are often too coarse for actual road-planning.

How should areas that appear ecologically sensitive on your map but already have roads laid out be dealt with?

Many environmentally important areas around the world already have roads. A key priority is to limit further road proliferation in these areas, and even to close some existing roads if it appears that they are causing a lot of environmental damage and generating only limited benefits.

A global strategy for road building

Impact of vehicular traffic on the use of highway edges by large mammals in a South Indian wildlife reserve

Rural accessibility and development: Sustainability concerns in an ecologically fragile mountain belt

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • In India, whether the roads

    In India, whether the roads are planned or unplanned, if they are close to ecologically sensitive zones the destruction of environment is very high as they help smugglers to easily transport their illegal goods. It is better to avoid ecologically sensitive zones for lying roads. The roads by themselves change the environment, weather, water flows.

    For example, Shamshabad Airport and ORR is the classical example. The impact assessment reports did not bothered on after affects. The water flows in to the drinking water reservoir reduced and with the secondary impacts, pollution started entering in to the lakes and as well reduced the lake catchment area with commercial activities.

    That means we must take in to account direct and indirect impacts before we say good or bad.

    Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy

    Posted by: Anonymous | 4 years ago | Reply
  • The maps relate to

    The maps relate to biodiversity & agiculrure. But what about impact on climate change if forests are destroyed

    Posted by: Anonymous | 4 years ago | Reply
  • The colour-codes used in the

    The colour-codes used in the map is strange - green from environmentally costly and red for beneficial!? It is all the more strange as it is in a NATURE piece. In false-colour coding sometimes red and green are interchanged ... but ... Please do not mind, it is just a visual reaction & not at all important.
    LCA of a road may point to a fact that Road construction, in the sense of roads we usually see or think of, is a burden both in emission sense and material-energy usage sense. There are several studies - for example - the Sightline Institute made an interesting study in 2007 -- "Increases in greenhouse-gas emissions from highway-widening projects" --
    BUT ANYWAY, thanks for such an informative article.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 4 years ago | Reply