The most vulnerable countries are clustered in the Middle East and North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia
Around 1.26 billion people across 30 countries are suffering from both extreme ecological risk and low levels of resilience, according to a new report.
These countries are least likely to be able to mitigate and adapt to new ecological threats, leading to mass displacement, the report said.
The report, Ecological Threat Report (ETR) 2021: Understanding ecological threats, resilience and peace, was released by the Institute of Economics and Peace (IEP), an international think tank.
Data from over 2,500 sub-national administrative units in 178 countries were assessed for threats relating to food risk, water risk, rapid population growth, temperature anomalies and natural disasters.
Of the 178 countries in the ETR, 30 were identified as hotspots for having low levels of resilience and a medium to extremely high catastrophic threat score. As many as 13 faced extremely high and 34 others faced high ecological threats.
The most vulnerable countries are clustered in the Middle East and North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, according to the report.
Ecological degradation and conflict work in a vicious circle, whereby one degradation of resources leads to conflict and vice versa.
Climate change will have an amplifying effect, causing further ecological degradation and pushing some countries through violent tipping points, said the report.
Of the 15 countries most threatened, nine are in sub-Saharan Africa, followed by three in south Asia.
As a region, south Asia is the worst-placed, with water and food risks driving the average ETR score in the region.
In sub-Saharan Africa, the score is influenced by high levels of population growth, which will place increased pressure on existing food and water scarcity.
The region has the highest proportion (66 per cent) of its population suffering from food insecurity, highlighting its severity of water and food risks.
Population growth and resource scarcity are intrinsically linked with conflict in sub-Saharan Africa, said the report.
Other key findings of the report are:
The report recommended a policy to combine health, food, water, refugee relief, finance, agricultural and business development into one integrated agency in high-risk areas and empowering local communities.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.