In contrast, cities that are working towards household-level segregation and decentralised recycling and reuse of waste have been given very poor ranking. Alappuzha (Kerala), which has a decentralised model for waste management, ranks 380th. Panjim city, which has adopted five point segregation, ranks 90th.
"Both Alappuzha and Panjim have no landfill sites or waste-to-energy incineration plants. Most of their waste is converted into compost or biogas. Inorganic wastes like plastic, glass, metals and papers are sent for recycling. These cities make money from solid wastes rather than spending crores in collecting and transporting wastes to landfills. Still, Swachh Survekshan 2017 has not given any recognition to these cities,” says Swati Sambyal, Programme Manager, Waste Management team.
Solid Waste Management should move towards behaviour change and local solutions, it is only then that we can achieve the goal of a Clean India
CSE’s analysis shows that Indore, which has been ranked first, is right now struggling to manage its waste. Similarly, Surat which is ranked 4th in the Sarvekshan results, is dumping 1600 Metric Tonnes per Day (MTD) of its unsegregated garbage in a landfill, that too, without processing.
“The methodology of Survekshan needs a serious relook as it is rewarding cities with environmentally unsustainable practices and discouraging cities that are working towards behaviour change and local solutions,” said Chandra Bhushan, Deputy Director General, CSE.
Next year, the ambit of Survekshan shall increase to 4041 statutory towns and cities of the country. The methodology of assessment needs to put in place more points for segregation and decentralised treatment. "Solid Waste Management should move towards behaviour change and local solutions. Only then we can achieve the goal of a Clean India," says Sunita Narain, Director General, CSE.