India Inc’s new bogey

Friday 30 November 2012

Industry raises the decibel against green clearances

Umesh SrinivasanAuduth Timblo is the owner of Fomento Group, one of the largest mining and iron ore exporting corporations in Goa. Last week during a meeting in Lisbon to promote business relations between Goa and Portugal, Timblo blamed an “overworked and underpaid judiciary” and its “activism”, and “green tape” in Indian governance for halting Goa’s economic development. Timblo’s allegations came on the heels of the Shah Commission report, based on which the Supreme Court cracked down on illegal mining in the state. One can understand big businesses being a little miffed about what they call “green tape”, but scarily they are not alone.

Recently, one of the country’s leading periodicals, India Today, splashed “Green Terror” across its cover, branding the Jairam Ramesh and Jayanthi Natarajan regimes at the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) as “enemies of development”. Both the editorial and the cover story were highly partisan attacks on what the publication subtitled “outdated environmental laws and inflexible ministers” who were out to “strangle” Indian economy.

The India Today feature is not an exception. Things start to get worrisome when people in high positions echo the magazine. Montek Singh Ahluwalia, deputy chairperson of the Planning Commission, thinks environmental clearances for developmental projects are “arbitrary, non-scientific and non-transparent”. The prime minister gives statements that equate MoEF’s recent record in providing clearances to the dreaded licence raj.

Wildlife and forests are the highlights of 50 of the 240 tourist destinations advertised on the Incredible India website

In fact, in response to allegations of delays in obtaining clearances, the government has proposed the National Investment Board (NIB), a high-level body that will be the last word in granting permission to large developmental projects (over Rs 1,000 crore), including mining and power. Once NIB approves a project, no other government body, ministry or department will be able to challenge the permission. What could possibly be more “arbitrary, non-scientific and non-transparent”? If the government was a person, a diagnosis of schizophrenia would be in order.

Delays in obtaining clearances from MoEF might well be a reality. For instance, according to the India Today article, 179 coal blocks and diversion of 28,771 hectares of forestland still await clearance. One would think that streamlining of the clearance process and greater transparency would be called for. But the response to this from India Inc., the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and the finance ministry is chilling.

A good representative of this reaction is a statement by a PMO official: “the ministry (of environment and forests) has tended to lean in favour of the need to protect (the) environment, keeping development at bay”. A truly simplistic, black-and-white understanding of a vastly complex issue, and one that succeeds in making environmental concerns the villain holding back India’s soaring aspirations.

It is as if to be patriotic, you also have to love dams, flyovers and coal mines. We do need electricity, canals, trains and LPG supplies. But the recent diatribe is based on an irresponsible polarisation of the issue that makes forests and wildlife the enemy. We need forests and a healthy environment to make sure that we can continue to have electricity, that we can continue to water crops and to sustain economic growth in the long term. We need our forests and natural ecosystems as buffers against events like global warming.

image

Instead, the direction we are moving in would be comical if it were not so seriously threatening. A case in point: the Rajasthan state mining and geology department “redefined” the Aravalli Hills. It stated that the hills start from 100 metres above ground level so that marble could be mined in the foothills of the Aravallis, a range in which mining was banned by the Supreme Court given its ecological fragility.

A 2008 report by The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, led by economist Pavan Suhkdev, highlights the economic and social importance of biodiversity and natural ecosystems. For instance, the report shows the protection of marine biodiversity is vital to ensure a sustainable supply of fish, which satisfy the protein requirements of a sixth of the world’s population. Water supply in India during the dry season, essential for agricultural productivity, is at serious risk from glaciers melting in the Himalayas in response to climate change. The livelihood of the rural poor, subsistence farmers and fishers, and traditional communities are jeopardised by loss of biodiversity.

The funny part is that the government seems proud of the country’s wildlife and forests, and at the same time is trying its best to bury them under mines and submerge them with dams. Since the government has been so forthcoming with figures, let me also present a few. In 2002, the government launched Incredible India, an international marketing campaign to attract tourists to the country. Of the about 240 tourist attractions listed on the main “destinations” page of the Incredible India website, more than 50 are proudly advertised for their wildlife and forests (including over 20 sanctuaries and national parks), more than the number of destinations of religious importance!

The Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Arunachal Pradesh are introduced with pictures of vast untouched forests, and Assam with the one-horned rhinoceros. Nagpur’s mascot is the tiger, not the Multi-modal International Cargo Hub and Airport, currently the largest development project in the country. India is the fastest growing tourism market in the Asia-Pacific region—in the last quarter of 2005 alone, tourism brought in US $372 million, which is the size of Venezuela’s GDP. A large part of this comes from wildlife-based tourism.

And yet we are schizophrenic even in our pride—we want to increase the height of Mullaperiyar dam in the heart of the Periyar Tiger Reserve and want to build a neutrino observatory that threatens Mudumalai Tiger Reserve. We cannot have both the observatory and Mudumalai, we cannot have both a dam and Silent Valley, and we certainly cannot have both Vedanta’s bauxite mines and forests in the hills of Niyamgiri. The choices that India faces are then clear and have been for a long time. Push for uninformed and unscientific “growth” as NIB would have us do or invest in the country’s ecological security. We need to make sure that this growth is sustainable and truly benefits people. This is not activism; this is common sense.

India Inc. has been so used to bulldozing its way through MoEF that it baselessly charges the recent MoEF regimes of the very crimes it is guilty of: arbitrariness, being self-serving and a complete lack of accountability. Upholding the laws that ensure the ecological security of the country must be the farthest thing from terrorism in a democratic republic. The real terrorism comes from the nexus between India Inc. and the offices of the finance ministry and PMO. For the colour-blind, a clarification would be in order. This is not green tape but good sense—the tape might be a little reddish, but that will be the colour of our landscape if we continue extracting ore at the cost of our ecological security.

Umesh Srinivasan, a wildlife biologist, is at the National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bengaluru

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • The wide coverages of the

    The wide coverages of the sensible issues of country's nature conservation scenario is the warning flag to policymakers. Great to read it.
    Thanks, Umesh!

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • Hi Umesh, A very well-written

    Hi Umesh,

    A very well-written article this. Made me recall a recently broadcast TV programme on Brazil by Michael Palin on BBC. Brazil probably has the highest per capita forest cover and a tremendous amount of biodiversity and faces similar threats from a fast-paced, growing economy. Its forests are disappearing at an alarming rate, brought about by illegal logging and clearing by miners, herders etc, and also legally by the industry. These forests are also home to some of the most threatened and vulnerable native tribes. So it will be interesting to see how a country that reminds us of football and Amazonian rain forests balances out its voracious thirst for growth with what it holds dear in the coming future.

    We in India need to consume more and more and manufacture even more to stay in the game but unless we as a nation understand that once these forests disappear so will we (slowly and painfully), nothing will stop this degradation.

    We need to incubate a culture of conservation and love for the 'local' environment in every child along with their daily painful dose of science, math, history, swimming lessons, karate classes and dance lessons. Unless the children grow up loving their natural environment we cannot expect our policies to change at any level.





    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • Venezuela's GDP numbers do

    Venezuela's GDP numbers do not seem right. Nonetheless a very nice article.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • The following additional


    The following additional facts are in order the indian neutrino observatory (INO) observatory issue :

    1. INO will be located in Bodi hills in theni district tamilnadu, and not the Mudumalai site as mentioned in the article. While the latter site was the first preference for the project, due to circumstances that many might call regrettable, the location had to be shifted to the bodi hills site and the decision to do so was taken around 2 years ago.

    2. At every stage during the planning, the key scientific institutions involved, which are some of the most renowned in India, have been open about every detail of the project (including its environmental impacts) and have tried to allay apprehensions about it. On the other hand, there has been much misinformation cited by opponents of the project, including many ecologists and politicians, as grounds for not having the project at the mudumalai site.

    Even after the decision to shift the project to the second preference site in bodi hills, blind assertions and unscientific reasoning have continued from various quarters and to their credit the INO project has been answering these with solid facts and reasoning -- not paranoia and knee-jerk reactions. Please see,

    http://www.ino.tifr.res.in

    to get the full picture and decide for yourself.

    Disclaimer :- I am not a beneficiary or associated with the neutrino observatory in any way.










    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • Great article Umesh! More

    Great article Umesh! More than anything it is heartening to see this come from a young person, inspires hope within me that we may ..may have a small chance of a future!
    I wonder when our policy makers will wake up to smell the trees and feel the greens and understand ( maybe they are pretending not to understand) that this ecosystem is our wealth , not the mines and dams and airports which we keep mindlessly building!

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • Well. That was useful

    Well. That was useful (including the link). But, certainly your argument(s) I hope are not generalisable to ALL projects in forest areas. For example, would you say the same things about the "green tape" that is preventing some coal mining and diversion of forest land for other purposes?

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • Very well argued points in

    Very well argued points in the article. Need many more such to be written.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • Sandeep, you are right. The

    Sandeep, you are right. The GDP of Venezuela is 317 billion dollars.

    Great article from Umesh, but hope that the fiures presented are verified and checked

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • It is interesting to contrast

    It is interesting to contrast the views of economists, including the PM and Montek Singh Ahluwalia, with the views of two of our leading economists Amartya Sen and Jean Dreze in an Outlook article titled 'Putting growth in its place': 'www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?278843'

    Sen and Dreze present a more balanced view than either the PMO or India Today (in the issue you mention). Sen and Dreze stress the importance and value of environment conservation and how economic growth linked with unbridled corporate power is likely to be deeply harmful to our society, to underprivileged people, and to democracy itself.

    One can argue that Sen and Dreze know more and have done more for real people-centric development than the Ahluwalia-Singh Reform brigade. Their words are worth listening to. Here are a couple of quotes from the piece:

    "There is also, in India, an urgent need for greater attention to the destructive aspects of growth, including environmental plunder (e.g. through razing of forests, indiscriminate mining, depletion of groundwater, drying of rivers and massacre of fauna) and involuntary displacement of communitiesÔÇöparticularly adivasi communitiesÔÇöthat have strong roots in a particular ecosystem." ...

    "Regulations and legislations pertaining to corporate funding of political parties, corporate social responsibility, financial transparency, environmental standards, and workersÔÇÖ rights also have an important role to play in disciplining the corporate sector."

    Posted by: Anonymous | 4 years ago | Reply
Scroll To Top