Tall pines enveloping the mountains, is the image most commonly conjured up when one talks of the Himalayas. Few, however, know that many of these conifers are in fact forced entries and largely responsible for the fragile state of the mountains.
A major factor that contributed to the rapid march of chirpine plantation was its capacity to regenerate early in comparison to other trees like sal and deodar. It also has the ability to spread from hill base to higher elevation, and from ridge top to lower elevation, thus encroaching upon areas where oak and broad-leafed forests respectively are located. Also pines bear seeds at a very early age that too in plenty and round the year. As the seed is much lighter than that of the deodar, it is easily carried by the wind and scattered all over the place. Where circumstances are favourable like sufficient water and light, it reproduces in great numbers. This is citied as the possible cause of ecological dominance of pines over other trees in the Himalayas. When pine invades the site, it prevents a possible reinvasion of oak through adaptional strategies. For instance, its leaves form a mat-like cover over the soil, preventing any other growth. The enormous carpet of the dried pine needles, which are highly infammable, has been the cause of several forest fires in the region in recent years. Moreover, with pine having virtually no capacity to retain water, its growth has resulted in the drying up of springs. It has very little canopy and does not permit any undergrowth of grasses, thus leaving the mountain slopes fully exposed to the erosion by rain and wind. Its leaves cannot be used as fodder, and have a high acid content, which makes the land infertile. Ironically, despite these negatives, monoculture of chirpine in the Himalayas is still rampant.
With the man-mountain equation changing due to greed and commercialisation, the forests are no longer seen as a pure form of nature, or having any great importance as far as the environment and ecology goes. Instead they have, as a money generating source, become a mode of business. To arrest this trend, which could spell a major ecological disaster in future. Ecologists advocate a proper balance between monetary concerns and environmental protection. The Finnish practice is a point in case. Finland has a huge forest resource and its economy is considerably dependent on these resources. This is particularly true of pulp and paper industry which contributes 40 per cent to the economy. By imposing strict regulations for environment conservation, Finland has been able to protect its forest cover. Similar practice can be initiated in India also. Mixed tree plantation as per the elevation of the slope, which stops the impoverishment of the soil, recharges the springs and improves the quality of water, is another option.
Besides, it is the mountain people themselves, especially women subsistence farmers, who can play a crucial role in securing this region's future. Linking their indigenous wisdom with modern technical expertise in any development measure will be helpful in keeping this region's ecology safe.
The author works with National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi