Environment

Precipitate

Air pollution and poor power supply can be two sides of the same coin. This is the message of the first environmental audit of electrostatic precipitators installed in thermal power plants to control pollution

DTE Staff
albeit
esp
spm
esp
Electrostatic farce
spm
spm
esp
cag
cag
seb
seb
cag
epa
Tosses up the losses
cag
esp
esp
spm
spm
spm
esp
esp
Electrostatic farce
SPM levels at power plants with ESPs show the mockery of pollution control
Name of the thermal
power station and unit
SPM* levels
in emissions
PERMISSIBLE LIMIT 150
Pataratu unit no 5 (Bihar) 38,963 (1998)
Pataratu unit no 1 (Bihar) 3,235 (1998)
Amarkantak Phase-II unit 4 (MP) 2,700 (1998)
Korba East Phase III unit 5 (MP) 2,648 (1995)
Korba East Phase III unit 6 (MP) 2,625 (1995)
Korba East Phase II unit 3 (MP) 1,508 (1996)
Bandal unit no 5 (WB) 1,085 (1998)
Amarkantak Phase I unit 2 (MP) 920 (1999)
Amarkantak Phase I Unit 1 (MP) 900 (1999)
Indraprastha unit no 5 (Delhi) 811 (1999)
Source: Anon 2000, Review of performance of electrostatic precipitators in thermal power stations, Report no 2 (Commercial) of 1999 and 2000, Comptroller and Auditor General of India, New Delhi
* SPM = suspended particulate matter. All figures in milligramme per cubic nanometre