Ghost of climate change haunts Rio

By Chandra Bhushan
Last Updated: Sunday 07 June 2015

Trust deficit between rich and poor nations, a legacy of failed climate negotiations, has led to paralysis of ambition

The distance between Flamengo Park and Rio Centro is as huge as the difference in thinking and expectations between civil society groups and governments.

Flamengo Park is where the Peoples’ Summit is being held and Rio Centro is where the official negotiations on the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development is taking place. At the Peoples’ Summit, thousands of activists, community groups and NGO representatives are discussing, debating and demanding a new future for the world: an environmentally sustainable future without poverty, discrimination and deprivation. At Rio Centro, however, governments have already finalised the final conference text, titled 'The future we want’, which reads more like a high school lesson in sustainable development than an action plan for a new sustainable development paradigm. Unlike the 1992 Rio conference, no new convention is being signed or new paradigm articulated.


At the Peoples' Summit simultaneously on at Flamengo Park in Rio, community groups, NGOs and activists are demanding a new future for the world

Text without meaning

The final text is a big disappointment. It is so minimalistic that it was finalised two days before the starting of the high-level session, in which the head of the states speak, negotiate and give finishing touches to the document. Every issue has either been postponed to some future date, or converted into ifs and buts or has been rendered completely meaningless by allowing each country to do whatever it wants. The document reflects a complete lack of ambition to tackle multiple crises and challenges—economic, social and environmental—the world is facing today.

There is absolutely no recognition in the text that Earth has finite carrying capacity; that humanity is already consuming resources and polluting the environment beyond the carrying capacity of Earth. At many places, the text reads more like a growth manifesto rather than a charter for sustainable development.   

This conference was supposed to usher in a “green economy”, but the final text has no definition for it. What it has on green economy are words without meaning. Sample the following: “We consider green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication as one of the important tools available for achieving sustainable development.”

Goalpost shifted

The conference was also to propose sustainable development goals (SDGs) to move the world towards a sustainable future. What it has, instead, are empty words and postponement of the development of such goals till 2015. The conservation and sustainable use of the oceans and seas was another big ticket item that the conference failed to address adequately.

So, why have the governments agreed to do so little?

I believe that the lack of trust between the developed and developing countries, created largely because of the failed climate change negotiations, has made the governments so defensive that there is a complete paralysis of ambition. The ghost of Copenhagen, Cancun and Durban has finally arrived to haunt Rio+20.

Photo Gallery>> Glimpses of Peoples' Summit at Rio

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Dear Mr. Bhushan: Answer to

    Dear Mr. Bhushan:

    Answer to your question or concern lies in the title that you ascribed to your article. Very correct and fair heading, indeed!!!

    Climate change is a ghost. No one has seen it in reality. We don't even know whether the ghost exists. It is just a fear of ghost. Same goes for the concept of climate change!!

    Nature is very very complex and I am not sure whether our scientists have understood it completely and therefore they are able to make only predictions, which may be true or false. Even these predictions are based on so many assumptions and not just facts. The day we understand the nature, we will stop praying to the God.

    Without denying the fact that we need to be resource efficient, it is also very justifiable, thoughtful, and appropriate that countries and governments take actions based on their self-interests. Nothing wrong in it. We all do when we do not have a clear picture. Why blame governments and countries!

    You mentioned that the earth has finite resources. Can CSE quantify these finite resources? No. We do not even know the exact amount and type of resources but we use this argument for ever in a subjective manner to get concrete results or quantifiable targets. Can we do it?

    But there is one fact that this ghost of climate change has given bread and butter to the millions and they will certainly like to keep this ghost alive in one way or the other.

    Sincerely yours;

    K D Bhardwaj

    Posted by: Anonymous | 8 years ago | Reply