Trust deficit between rich and poor nations, a legacy of failed climate negotiations, has led to paralysis of ambition
The distance between Flamengo Park and Rio Centro is as huge as the difference in thinking and expectations between civil society groups and governments.
Flamengo Park is where the Peoples’ Summit is being held and Rio Centro is where the official negotiations on the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development is taking place. At the Peoples’ Summit, thousands of activists, community groups and NGO representatives are discussing, debating and demanding a new future for the world: an environmentally sustainable future without poverty, discrimination and deprivation. At Rio Centro, however, governments have already finalised the final conference text, titled 'The future we want’, which reads more like a high school lesson in sustainable development than an action plan for a new sustainable development paradigm. Unlike the 1992 Rio conference, no new convention is being signed or new paradigm articulated.
Text without meaning
The final text is a big disappointment. It is so minimalistic that it was finalised two days before the starting of the high-level session, in which the head of the states speak, negotiate and give finishing touches to the document. Every issue has either been postponed to some future date, or converted into ifs and buts or has been rendered completely meaningless by allowing each country to do whatever it wants. The document reflects a complete lack of ambition to tackle multiple crises and challenges—economic, social and environmental—the world is facing today.
There is absolutely no recognition in the text that Earth has finite carrying capacity; that humanity is already consuming resources and polluting the environment beyond the carrying capacity of Earth. At many places, the text reads more like a growth manifesto rather than a charter for sustainable development.
This conference was supposed to usher in a “green economy”, but the final text has no definition for it. What it has on green economy are words without meaning. Sample the following: “We consider green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication as one of the important tools available for achieving sustainable development.”
The conference was also to propose sustainable development goals (SDGs) to move the world towards a sustainable future. What it has, instead, are empty words and postponement of the development of such goals till 2015. The conservation and sustainable use of the oceans and seas was another big ticket item that the conference failed to address adequately.
So, why have the governments agreed to do so little?
I believe that the lack of trust between the developed and developing countries, created largely because of the failed climate change negotiations, has made the governments so defensive that there is a complete paralysis of ambition. The ghost of Copenhagen, Cancun and Durban has finally arrived to haunt Rio+20.
Photo Gallery>> Glimpses of Peoples' Summit at Rio
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.