Pollution board report blames LPG for particulate matter, spares vehicles
Flawed, but accepted
A recent study by the Central Pollution Control Board has exonerated vehicles of being the worst polluters in Delhi and Mumbai. Instead, it has pinned down liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) as the biggest source of fine pollutants. Experts have contested the study, saying the findings are unsubstantiated and scientifically untenable. The study will set the basis for the post-2010 emissions standards for vehicles and fuels.
The board (CPCB) had asked premier institutes IIT Madras, IIT Kanpur, National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) in Nagpur, The Energy and Research Institute in Delhi, and the Automotive Research Association of India in Pune to conduct the study in Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Kanpur, Chennai and Bengaluru. Researchers analysed the load of major air pollutants like PM10 and PM2.5 (particulate matters less than 10 and 2.5 micrometres), oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and sulphur dioxide (SO2), identified their sources and suggested action plans to achieve clean air.
It is the NEERI study analysing sources of PM2.5 in Delhi and Mumbai that has come under fire. These fine pollutants cause diseases like lung cancer. They are mostly emitted by vehicles. But NEERI’s study claims LPG combustion is the biggest contributor to PM2.5 load in Delhi’s air; it contributes 61 per cent in industrial areas, 49 per cent in residential areas and 41 per cent along roadside.
Sarath Guttikunda, developer of SIM-air, an air quality monitoring tool used at the Commonwealth Games in Delhi, questioned the figures. Fine particulates are not emitted directly from LPG combustion. Besides, how can the results be logically possible given the number of diesel-fuelled trucks that pass through the city every day, the use of gensets and the number of industries in the region, he said. CPCB studies in Chennai, Bengaluru, Kanpur and Pune show vehicular exhaust as the biggest contributor of PM2.5 pollutants.
Apart from being dubious, NEERI’s report was also incomplete. “We pulled back the findings on PM2.5 in Mumbai as they were erratic,” Rakesh Kumar, head of NEERI Mumbai, said. It was based on limited samples, he added. Prashant Gargava, scientist at CPCB, said the conclusions for PM2.5 in the final report are “preliminary” and further research should be done to ascertain the contribution of point sources.
PM2.5 is an emerging pollutant and researchers were asked to analyse its sources at a later stage of the study. Hence, the samples were limited, he added. Kumar said CPCB should have mentioned in its final report that PM2.5 data was based on limited studies.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.