Arsenic control

West Bengal, severely affected by arsenic in its groundwater, takes slow but steady steps to deal with it

 
By Nitya Jacob
Last Updated: Monday 17 August 2015

Arsenic control

The arsenic removal unit in Bihar’s Ramnagar village is a rare successful example outside West Bengal

Groundwater contamination by arsenic has been a major concern across the globe. In India, this highly toxic chemical exists in natural form in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Assam. Exposure to it can cause discolouration of skin, warts and even death.

India has, however, been slow in tackling the problem. Till date, only West Bengal has rolled out a plan to make its groundwater fit for consumption. The state government aims to provide every locality at least one source of arsenic-free water by 2013.

In 2005, the West Bengal government formed a task force to implement its arsenic removal schemes. But the schemes failed miserably, perhaps because the government rested the responsibilities of the everyday upkeep of arsenic removal units (ARUs) and water distribution on people not ready for it. The state government then asked the companies that fitted arsenic removal equipment to take up the responsibility, but the companies found the remuneration meagre.

imageIn 2009, the state government entrusted its Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) with the construction, operation and maintenance of ARUs. In villages, it asked panchayats to handle water distribution.

As per the plan, the state government will set up 338 ARUs to clean groundwater. For surface water, or river water, conventional methods will be used. River water usually does not have arsenic and can be treated conventionally through sedimentation and chlorination. Of the Rs 2,100 crore allocated for the plan, Rs 974 crore will be spent on seting up ARUs.

Cleaning options

ARUs are set up depending upon the level of arsenic and iron content in groundwater. Water containing less than 50 parts per billion (ppb) arsenic and less than 1 miligram per litre iron, is considered safe and supplied without treatment. If arsenic and iron content exceed these limits, the water is treated.

PHED will set up ARUs in tubewells that can cater to about 5,000 families. An equipment installed in the tubewell performs the initial cleaning with alum or bleaching powder, and passing the water through a layer of hematite, a form of iron ore. Water then flows into another chamber where arsenic is separated through sedimentation. In the third chamber, filteration of the remaining arsenic is done through a sand bed. Clean water is then ready for use.

Setting up one ARU can cost up to Rs 70 lakh. However, its running cost is only about Rs 10 per kilolitre. “ARUs last long and are most effective in removing arsenic from water,” says Arunabha Majumder, member of the West Bengal Arsenic Task Force. Water thus treated has arsenic content less than 10 ppb, safe according to the World Health Organization and the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). BIS has set 50 ppb as the acceptable limit.

Many households have installed smaller and cheaper versions of ARU. Majumdar gives the instance of a homegrown version of filter that uses bleaching powder and alum, which are easily available. Bleaching powder oxidises arsenic and alum acts as the coagulating agent. Water is then passed through a sand filter that adsorbs any residual arsenic. The filter needs to be changed once every three years.

According to studies conducted by the Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, the Hanoi University of Science and other Vietnam government departments, such filters are foolproof if changed before their efficacy expires.

image

Another simple option is the single stage filter, developed by the department of sanitary engineering of All-India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health in Kolkata. When alum is mixed with water, it separates iron and arsenic from water. These are allowed to settle and the filtered water is ready to use.

Yet another method treats water by use of bleaching powder, aluminum sulphate and activated alumina. The residual arsenic-rich sludge has to be removed periodically in this process.

These smaller technologies are being used across the state, but the government finds it difficult to monitor each one from time to time. The government, therefore, plans to improve technologies of the existing methods.

Bihar slow, rest sleep

While West Bengal has taken baby steps towards controlling arsenic, no state is working towards it. Bihar has not gone beyond preparing a sketchy plan. “Nothing concrete has happened,” admits Prakash Kumar, adviser to the Bihar government on rural water and sanitation. The state government, along with Unicef, had installed some ARUs and started rainwater harvesting for dilution of arsenic content in groundwater, but with limited success.

Ashok Ghosh, head of environmental science department at Anugraha Narayan College in Patna, attributes the failures to inadequacies in public participation. The units were abandoned within months, he says.

In Ramnagar village, 20 kilometres from Patna, Unicef had installed solar-powered pumps in many dug wells to provide arsenic-free water. “But the pumps broke down within months because the operators were not trained to operate them. They are expensive and were stolen,” says Dhirendar Kumar, student at Patna University researching on arsenic mitigation in the state.

ARUs can be made effective by devising standard operating protocols for their operation, maintenance, safe disposal of waste and regular testing of raw and treated water, says Prakash Kumar. Panchayats and the community should be properly trained for this, he adds.

In March 2011, A N College set up an ARU in Ramnagar. Ramkishan Singh, outside whose house it has been set up, was trained to look after the unit. “I see to it that the unit stays operational so that my family and others in the village get arsenic-free water.”

Such efforts indicate that the seriousness of arsenic contamination in groundwater is being recognised. What is required is to make its mitigation a success by involving the public in planning and maintenance, while also giving other states the necessary push.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • Yes, arsenic in groundwater

    Yes, arsenic in groundwater (DTE, 15th Nov. 2012) is a burning issue in parts of our country. The suggested model of ARU in West Bengal and the initiatives started by various departments are not significant and do not match the dimensions of the issue.

    The questions now are: how many ARUs should be installed, what is the cost of installation & operation, ways for the disposal of waste, regular monitoring to check the content of arsenic before filtration and after filtration .... so on. The process of ARUs is time & money consuming, long-term process without end, and may not be sustainable.

    As reported in the article,arsenic occurs naturally and contaminates the groundwater. The best way is to find out ways to mitigate it at source itself.

    With the modern tools, it is possible to map the possible zone of pollution. Once it is picked, based on the degree of intensity, and depth measures should be taken to dilute it for getting the severity into the acceptable limits. One of the suggestion is to develop "injection wells" and inject fresh water to dilute the concentration of arsenic. The local stakeholders can take the support of the CGWB & state groundwater authorities for refining the measures.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply