Budget 2008 no relief to agricultural recession

Budget 2008 no relief to agricultural recession
Published on

it was the biggest feature of the union budget, and was played to the maximum effect. Waiver of small and marginal farmers' loans amounting to Rs 60,000 crore triggered a virtual stampede among political parties to claim credit for it; the ruling United Progressive Alliance (upa) termed the decision 'momentous'. The budget, however, offers little to address the larger problem of agricultural recession, the main reason behind severe indebtedness of farmers (see graph Unsustainable).

Available official data shows that rainfed areas with the maximum concentration of small and marginal farmers will not benefit from the waiver. Add to it the fact that the budget does little else to raise agricultural productivity in rainfed areas, and it becomes clear the decision will not go a long way in reversing the recession.The Economic Survey that preceded the budget had made an urgent call "A second Green Revolution, particularly in the areas which are rainfed, may be necessary to improve the income of the persons dependent on the agriculture sector." It did not find an echo in the 2008-09 budget.

"Writing off loans may not have any real beneficial effect on the areas and cultivators that are the worst affected by agrarian distress," says Jayati Ghosh, an economist with Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi who has extensively studied agrarian crisis in India. It seems the government has done creative accounting to minimize the scope of waiver but to extract the maximum political mileage. "Seventy per cent of farmers who own less than one hectare do not opt for commercial credit. So the waiver bypasses them," says Mohan Guruswamy, chairperson of the Delhi-based Centre for Policy Alternative.

Unsustainable
Small, marginal farmers make loss
Source National Sample Survey Organization, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers, 2003
An immense burden
The waiver bypasses the majority of the marginal and small farmers who do not take loans from banks and cooperatives
Out of relief net
Smaller the landholding, more the farmer depends on non-institutional credit
Source National Sample Survey Organization, Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers, 2003
Out of relief net
The bigger picture
upa
The Economic Survey prescribes an enhanced focus on rainfed areas to raise agricultural productivity; the budget ignores this
gdp
Highlights
The 40 per cent growth in tax revenue could have been an opportunity to spend more money on the social sector. But budgetary provisions paint a different picture. There has been a six per cent growth in the government expenditure from Rs 7.09 lakh crore last year to around Rs 7.5 lakh crore this year. As a percentage of gdp this is a decrease from 15.1 per cent to 14.2 per cent.

Education Budget outlay increased by 20 per cent; but the sector accounts for only 2.84 per cent of gdp against the promised 6 per cent. Outlay for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan decreased from Rs 12,020 crore last year to Rs 11,940 crore this year. Education cess accounts for 60 per cent of the government spending on elementary education.

Health Allocation increased by 15 per cent to Rs 16,534 crore. Increment in the National Rural Health Mission is 11.4 per cent contrary to the promised 30 per cent every year. Private sector healthcare gets a tax benefits.

Rural Development Expenditure on rural development as a proportion of gdp remains unchanged. Rural employment expenditure has declined from 2.56 per cent of the total in 2005-06 to 1.92 per cent in 2008-09.

Urban Development Allocation for the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission increased by 25 per cent. Half of this is for urban infrastructure and governance. Slum development and urban poor get a decreasing allocation.

Automobiles Excise on buses reduced from 16 per cent to 12 per cent, but not done away with. Excise on small cars also reduced, but no punishment for dirtier diesel cars.

Related Stories

No stories found.
Down To Earth
www.downtoearth.org.in