Paddy farmers save water, energy and money by adopting this farming approach, the study points out
Agriculture is both the cause and victim of water scarcity. Excessive use of water threatened the sustainability of livelihoods dependent on water and agriculture, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization.
The country’s agriculture sector already consumed over 83 per cent of the available water resources, according to the Central Water Commission. And the demand will grow.
In the recent past, there was a global demand to shift to sustainable farming systems, such as zero-budget natural farming (ZBNF). India, too, introduced ZBNF in its Union Budget 2019-20.
As the name suggests, it is the adaptation of an ancient practice that reduces farmers’ direct cost and encourages them to use natural inputs, such as cow dung and cow urine. The inputs help manage soil nutrition, fertility, pests and seeds.
The technology requires less tilling and completely rejects the use of inorganic fertilisers, pesticides and herbicides. It is also water-efficient. Of late, all these benefits were popularised, but in 2019, a group of researchers tried to quantify it.
Researchers at Bengaluru-based technology-policy think-tank Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy conducted an exploratory study in Andhra Pradesh to compare ZBNF and non-ZBNF techniques in paddy, groundnut, chilli, cotton and maize farming.
The comparison was made on six parameters: Water, electricity, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, yield and net revenue.
The study — published February 2020 — was conducted in Andhra Pradesh’s Anantapuramu, Prakasam, Vizianagaram and West Godavari districts during kharif season, ensuring variation in agro-climatic zones, farming techniques, production and social aspects.
It found maximum benefits of ZBNF in paddy farming, with a saving of 1,400 to 3,500 cubic metres of water per acre per paddy cropping period (one acre equals 0.4 hectare).
This was accomplished by increasing the time interval of irrigation cycles — every eight to 10 days — unlike the conventional method that required watering every five to six days. Water saving was attributed to the multiple aeration practice. This water management method involves periodic aeration of the soil between watering periods.
Water consumption in paddy cultivation depended on the frequency and depth of irrigation. Paddy farms under ZBNF were irrigated with only 2.54-5.7 centimetres-deep water, while those under non-ZBNF were watered up to 12.7 cm.
ZBNF advocates mulching of crop residues to promote moisture retention in soil and increase humus. It also involves waaphasa (soil aeration) to reduce water consumption.
Traditional flood irrigation was plagued with inconsistent spread of nutrients — with excess water use — something that can also drop crop productivity.
Although the study did not observe much impact on crop yield, multiple aeration and reduced water use showed other benefits. In just one crop season, electricity consumption of farms relying on groundwater reduced by 1,500-3,900 units per acre and saved Rs 6,000-16,000.
Further, multiple aeration hindered microbial activity and cut methane emissions by 88 per cent, compared to the conventional flooding practice. This led to an additional saving of fossil fuels used for electricity generation and emissions reduction.
Growing paddy can save water
If all of India’s paddy area — 43-44 million ha — is brought under ZBNF, 150-400 billion cubic metre of water can potentially be saved.
The volume is equivalent to storage potential of 40 to 100 Tehri dams, one of India’s biggest dams located in Uttarakhand. Additionally, ZBNF can address several on-ground challenges, such as groundwater-stress, water disparity in canal water usage and overuse of resources (flooded irrigation).
In India, 70 per cent of the farms rely on groundwater, which depletes reserves. In water-stressed zones, tubewells have to be dug up to about 300 metres.
ZBNF can avoid the current drawing of groundwater by 50-60 per cent, ensure adequate groundwater reserve, improve water table and reduce financial and labour stress on farmers.
ZBNF farming can also solve disputes between farming communities where upstream farmers employ canal irrigation and end up guzzling more water, leaving downstream farms with insufficient volume.
ZBNF does show water-saving potential and can address India’s food and security in the long run, but deep investigation is required to ascertain if it can be replicated in the various agro-climatic zones across the country.
As they say, Rome was not built in a day. Similarly, ZBNF requires time and policy support so that the government provides monetary help for it to be adopted in all states.
NS Suresh is a research scientist and Arjun Shanker is a research analyst at Bengaluru-based policy think-tank Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.