Nurturing effect of pine

Pine trees have helped restore native vegetation in Sri Lanka’s Sinharaja Forest Reserve

 
By Sandhya Sekar
Last Updated: Saturday 04 July 2015

Pine trees attract birds and bats which disperse seeds. They also improve soil fertility by retaining moisture

EFFORTS to restore rainforest tree species in Sri Lanka’s Sinharaja Forest Reserve have ultimately borne fruit. It has been found that pine trees are very effective in providing favourable conditions for growth underneath. Till now there have been no ecological processes that could fully restore wet forests.

Over the past 25 years, researchers have been trying to restore native tree species in forest reserves across South Asia. Fast-growing species such as Pinus caribaea, Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus spp were planted in large tracts of abandoned agricultural land and degraded forests in southwest Sri Lanka and in the Western Ghats of India under reforestation programmes in the 1970s and 1980s. Such plantations make the environment more hospitable. They attract birds and bats which help in seed dispersal. They also improve soil fertility by increasing organic matter and by retaining moisture. These factors make the area conducive for native species.

“In southwest Sri Lanka, pine plantations have proven to be very effective at shading fire-dependent grasses and ferns. The pine themselves are fire- and drought-tolerant, making them hardy pioneers that can be planted in open lands that were once agricultural lands but have been abandoned because the soils have eroded or become nutrient poor,” says Mark Ashton, first author of the paper published online on April 8 in Forest Ecology and Management.

Ashton also said he would recommend planting pine plantations in abandoned agricultural areas. The only problem, he says, is that pine can naturalise—it can spread widely if unchecked, even becoming an invasive species that outcompetes natives. Priya Davidar, professor of ecology at Pondicherry University, agrees. “The plantation tree chosen to act as a ‘nurse’ species should not be invasive. I also doubt that regeneration takes place under young plantations; there is probably regeneration only when the plantation trees are old and there is less competition and allelopathy (the process of secretion of chemicals by some species to deter growth of other plants in the vicinity). I would recommend native tree species for nurse trees, rather than an exotic like pine,” she says. However, use of other native species as nurse trees needs further research.

“Native species like Alstonia macrophylla or Peresereanthes falcataria are some candidates [for nurse trees] which we have tried here. Fire protection and soil conservation during early days may be needed [for them]. [Native species such as] Dipterocarpus spp and Michelia champaca can then be planted,” said Nimal Gunatilleke from the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Gunatilleke was one of the authors of the study.

Other species that were used for plantations (Acacia spp and Eucalyptus spp) also need to be studied. However, there is now an opportunity to better manage the extensive pine plantation across South Asia.

Monetary Returns
 
Planting pine in degraded areasÔÇêand allowing ecological processes to take overÔÇêis not just an effective way of restoring native tree species, it can be monetarily beneficial as well. Economically important native species of Sri Lanka (such as Diospyros quaesita, a type of ebony, and Pericopsis mooniana) can be planted for timber requirements. Caryota urens or the sugar palm, a non-timber forest produce with high economic value can be another option.

Vines like pepper and lianas that have medicinal value can also increase economic returns from pine plantations. Using data on the growth rates ofÔÇêspecies and market surveys, the authors compared monetary returns offered by pine restoration with that of tea cultivation. Results showed that over a 60 year period, planned cultivation under pine can be 1.5 times more beneficial than tea plantations.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • While appreciating the

    While appreciating the author's views, may we point out that the context ( Sinharaja rainforest) is in an area of high rainfall.
    The use of Pinus planted in a monoculture plantation in drier areas such as the sub montane Uva province has had different impacts. The regeneration of native seedlings has been poor and whatever that has managed to survive has also had to deal with the threat of fire in the dry season. Further the allelopathic nature of Pinus has been inimical for the regeneration of ferns, Forbes and other native plants that make up the ground cover.
    On the other hand, our experience with using native pioneers such as Macaranga or the exotic Gliricidia as nurse species has been very effective. These species establish fast, create shade, increase leaf litter and also serve as hosts for economically lucrative crops like pepper.
    Having engaged in land rehabilitation for the past twenty + years we are fully confident in saying that there are far better candidates as nurse species than Pinus.
    K. Melvani, Neo Synthesis Research Centre, Sri Lanka

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • I think it's time to study

    I think it's time to study the devastating impact of pine trees in Uttarakhand!

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • The main contention of this

    The main contention of this article appears based on a single study of a particular context in Sri Lanka. There's an enormous irresponsible sweeping generalisation of the benefits of pine as a nurturing pioneer species. This is certainly not true of the entire western Himalayas. Where the dominant himalayan chir pine is an aggressive bioinvader and does no such nurturing of native species. In fact the opposite is true.
    The overall tenor and impression left by the article on anyone not well versed with pine trees is highly problematic and misleading.
    I and numerous others trust Down to Earth with much more care with what they write.
    Please take care and look into this goof up.
    peace trees

    Posted by: Anonymous | 5 years ago | Reply
  • The researchers worked on

    The researchers worked on pine trees that were used to reclaim land cleared decades ago. This land was cleared for agriculture but was abandoned when it became infertile. The researchers found that these pine tree played an important role in restoring the areas. They do not recommend that pine should be the tree of choice for reclamation as it has the potential to become invasive. Our article too points this out and we also indicate that native trees would be best for restoration. The researchers mention other trees that could be used instead of pine.

    Posted by: Vibha Varshney | 3 years ago | Reply