Centre's order allows granting of mine leases to applications without environment clearance

The ministry’s order, however, states that mining activity cannot begin before the environment clearance is obtained

By Chinmayi Shalya
Last Updated: Monday 09 January 2017 | 10:39:40 AM
The ministry's order has led to confusion, experts say (Credit: Agnimirh Basu/CSE)
The ministry's order has led to confusion, experts say (Credit: Agnimirh Basu/CSE)
The ministry's order has led to confusion, experts say (Credit: Agnimirh Basu/CSE)

In a bid to prevent lease applications from lapsing, the Ministry of Mines has issued an order asking state governments to grant mining lease to certain applicants even if they do not have environment clearance. The Union ministry’s order is only applicable to cases where application was submitted before January 2015, when a crucial amendment was passed.

The order, dated January 4, states that no mining activity will be allowed until the environmental clearance is obtained. The latest development has prompted confusion, experts say.

It allows mining leases for projects that have a letter of intent from respective state governments and were in process of procuring clearances before Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act of 2015, was passed. The amendment, which mandated the grant of mining leases only through auctions, allowed a two-year-long period to older applicants to obtain a lease. Come January 12, the window ends.

The ministry’s order prevents more than 100 applications from lapsing. However, environment experts caution that there has to be a clear process spelt out in case a lessee is eventually denied the environment clearance. “If in case the clearance does not come through, what will happen to the lease? It should be clearly put out whether the lease will stand cancelled or not,” said environment lawyer Rahul Choudhary. “There should not be instances where, despite the clearance not coming through, the lease still holds. It might create a situation conducive to illegalities,” he added.


Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Related Story:

Will Adani ever pay for the destruction at Mundra?

Andhra Pradesh puts Eastern Ghats bauxite mining project on hold

New sand mining guidelines call for robust monitoring and sustainable development

Parliamentary Standing Committee rejects TSR Subramanian report on environmental laws

Ministry of mines set to expand iron ore mining

IEP Resources:

Judgement of the Supreme Court of India regarding mining operations by Saniem Sacorda Iron Ore Mine even after the expiry of environmental clearance, Goa, 12/07/2016

Judgement of the National Green Tribunal regarding mining operations on the hills situated in Village Damkhed, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 26/07/2016

Question raised in Lok Sabha Environmental Clearance for Mining, 26/04/2016

Closing the enforcement gap: groundtruthing of environmental violations in Sarguja, Chhattisgarh

We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • as on 12-01-2015 which minerals are major mineral and as on transfer minor mineral as on 10-02-2015, those minerals applications before 12-01-2015 and not loi, not ineligible order before 10-02-2015 are ineligible as on 10-00-2015 and there after

    Posted by: Kishor | 2 months ago | Reply