Subscribe
India has built systems such as the Sameer app to make real-time air quality data visible to citizens.
But AQI information alone does not protect people unless it triggers action in schools, clinics, district administrations and public health programmes.
The article argues that India’s next clean air challenge is to connect air pollution data with health advisories, frontline workers and care guidelines.
On World Environment Day, the focus must shift from measuring polluted air to building a response system for those most at risk.
Open your phone, and search for “Sameer” on the Play Store/App Store. Download it, and check your city’s Air Quality Index.
The Central Pollution Control Board launched the Sameer app in 2016 to give citizens real-time access to the National Air Quality Index. Sameer 2.0, released in September 2025 on CPCB’s 51st Foundation Day, brought a cleaner interface, location-based services and improved engagement features. It is a serious piece of public infrastructure.
This World Environment Day, the United Nations is asking a deceptively simple question: what signals are we sending back to a planet already in motion? The 2026 theme places climate change at the centre. For India, that conversation cannot begin without the air we breathe.
Beyond the dashboard, Sameer carries a grievance redressal channel. A citizen can photograph a burning garbage heap or a smoke-belching truck and file a complaint directly with CPCB. It frames the citizen not as a passive recipient of data, but as an active participant in environmental accountability — a digital expression of Jan Bhagidari.
But intent and impact are two different audits. The honest question is not whether Sameer was well designed. It is whether it was designed for what air quality communication in India actually needs to achieve. If the AQI in your city reads 320 — “very poor” — what happens next?
The app has done its job and informed you. But information, on its own, rarely changes outcomes at scale. It does not tell your child’s school whether to cancel outdoor sports or trigger a protocol at the nearest primary health centre. It does not prompt a district health officer to issue a public advisory or adjust the care pathway for a tuberculosis patient whose lungs are especially vulnerable to pollution spikes. And for a lung cancer patient, every sustained spike is not a discomfort. It is a clinical event that no Indian care guideline currently accounts for.
The number is accurate and it is visible. But without a corresponding system of action, it is largely inert. Monitoring came first, as it should. The harder work — translating data into institutional action — must be the next phase.
Internationally, peer-reviewed studies of AirForU in the United States, AirRater in Australia and Canada’s air quality alert programme converge on a single finding: information changes behaviour only when it is paired with health-linked messaging, personalised design and active community engagement.
India’s own experience makes the gap clear. CPCB’s citizen guidelines for Delhi-National Capital Region mandate that complaints filed through Sameer be redressed within 24 hours. Yet in Hyderabad, 96 such complaints remained unresolved as of January 2025, with CPCB itself acknowledging to the Deccan Chronicle that, outside the NCR, the app simply forwards complaints by email to State Pollution Control Boards. But this chain breaks if no one is reading the inbox.
As of May 2026, nearly a decade after launch, Sameer carries a 2.3-star rating on Google Play across roughly 1,700 reviews and more than 100,000 downloads, in a country of 1.4 billion people. Complaints filed and closed without resolution appear repeatedly in recent user reviews.
When we consider who bears the heaviest burden of air pollution in India, it is rarely the smartphone-owning urban professional who might download an app like Sameer. The greatest risks are faced by the construction worker labouring outdoors when AQI levels soar above 400, often with little access to protective measures. They are borne by families living in poorly ventilated homes in coal-belt districts, where an ASHA worker may be the only link to the healthcare system. They are also carried by lung cancer patients, for whom every spike in pollution represents a serious clinical threat rather than a temporary inconvenience.
For these populations, a better app is not the primary need. What is needed is the translation of air quality information into practical public health action through ASHA training modules, district-level health advisories, school safety protocols, tuberculosis programmes, and cancer prevention and care guidelines that account for seasonal fluctuations in pollution exposure.
Achieving this does not require new technology. It requires connecting the knowledge we already possess with the health and governance systems that already serve these communities.
A few questions also deserve institutional answers.
What, for instance, is a district health officer expected to do when the AQI remains above 300 for three consecutive days? At present, there is no national protocol and no administrative trigger within the public health system that links specific air quality thresholds to a defined health response.
This disconnect is visible elsewhere as well. Air pollution is a well-established risk factor for tuberculosis, yet India’s TB elimination programme and its air quality monitoring systems operate in separate institutional silos under different ministries, with little integration between them.
The gap extends to frontline healthcare. What guidance do ASHAs and Auxiliary Nurse Midwives receive when counselling pregnant women, children with asthma, or cancer patients undergoing treatment during periods of severe air pollution? In most cases, none. Standard training frameworks offer little support on how to incorporate air quality risks into routine health advice and care.
Perhaps, then, India does not need more dashboards, apps or data streams. What it needs is the harder and more consequential task of translating evidence into policy and embedding that knowledge within public health systems. The science is increasingly clear; the next layer of action must come from the health sector itself.
From measurement to movement
Here's a more polished and fluid version with stronger transitions and a sharper conclusion:
Sameer exists. So does the National Clean Air Programme, launched in January 2019, which brought 131 non-attainment and million-plus cities under city-specific clean air action plans and is now entering its next phase. Air quality monitoring stations have expanded across the country, and access to data has improved considerably.
But the next phase of Jan Bhagidari is more challenging than simply generating or sharing information. It is about ensuring that the number on a screen means something to a nurse in a primary health centre, a teacher deciding whether children should remain outdoors, an ASHA worker counselling vulnerable families, or a programme manager planning a local response. Most importantly, it is about ensuring that when air quality deteriorates, something within the health system responds.
On World Environment Day, much will be said about the signals the Earth is sending us. Sameer is one such signal, translated into a number we can measure and understand. The signal we send back, however, cannot be another dashboard or another app. It must be a response architecture—one that links air quality data to decisions in schools, primary health centres, district administrations and clinical practice. It must be a system that moves every time the air does.
India does not lack data about its air. The challenge now is to build what comes after the data.
Urvashi Prasad is Founder Director, PAVANA – Centre for Air Pollution & Environmental Health, Pahle India Foundation and Palak Mahajan is Research Associate, PAVANA
Views expressed are the authors’ own and don’t necessarily reflect those of Down To Earth