Business As Usual has been the bane of climate negotiations. Its answers are equally bad
at l'aquila in Italy, during a meeting of the world's major boys and girls, India agreed to cap its carbon emissions.
The agreement proclaimed the signatory countries would work together to limit global temperature rise to 2C from pre-industrial time. It was as if
they were writing off bad debt. India, it seemed, had deviated from its stand that only rich countries should take up binding commitment on
emission reduction (The two-degree shift) .
India and other developing nations do not want to take the lead to cut emissions because the historical responsibility for climate change rests on
industrialized countries. So the backroom boys of the North have created a new term to avoid the word 'commitment'. They call it deviation from
bau (Business As Usual). And India almost agreed, politically. Climate negotiations have always been full of
deception, clever wordplay, and bluffing. Business as usual, one may say.
Nobody wants to reduce emissions, because that is linked with making money--usual business. The chief US climate negotiator said recently
that his country will take the year 2005 as the baseline for reduction, as opposed to 1990 as science demands, because US emissions have
already increased since then. He said 1990 was politically unacceptable. It is a sad reflection on our times that politics cannot be seen outside
business. The atmosphere does not respond favourably to these tricks. That is business as usual, too.
The rich countries will meet a large part of their commitments through carbon offset, a market-driven process. This is another mockery--the price
of carbon is too low for developing countries to replace their fossil fuel-based energy with renewables. Rich countries are turning transfer of
technology and finance into a business opportunity. The purpose of diplomacy is furthering a country's business opportunities. Business, as
It won't surprise if India also tries to maximize its climate-business in poorer nations. Diplomats of the old school control climate talks, under
politicians of the old school, where each party wants to win. Only in this game, we all need to lose so that everyone wins. In that respect, no one is
deviating from bau. Our future is bleak. bau, bau, take
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.