A 2015 report by US-based Ocean Conservancy blamed 5 Asian countries for plastic waste
A United States-based environmental advocacy group had committed to accountability mechanisms and correcting false narratives set by a seven-year-old report, securing a major win against waste colonialism.
A 2015 report by non-profit Ocean Conservancy (OC) placed the burden of plastic waste solely on the shoulders of five Asian countries. OC has now pledged to work with environmental group Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) for restorative actions requested by communities and sectors most impacted by the analysis.
Stemming the Tide: Land-based strategies for a plastic-free ocean had blamed China, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam for plastic waste. It completely ignored the role of the Global North in plastic overproduction and waste exports to these countries.
Richer, more developed countries showing dominance over lesser-developed ones by exporting their toxic garbage was termed waste colonisation in 1989. These less developed countries are often ill-equipped to deal with waste, which affects their communities and environment.
The 2015 report led to years of damage, by pushing incineration of garbage as a solution to the problem. It has now been removed from OC’s website and the non-profit issued an apology for it in July 2022.
OC’s agreements with GAIA include prioritising plastic reduction policies, moving resources to Zero Waste solutions, denouncing false solutions like burning plastics in so-called “waste to energy” (WTE) incinerators and “chemical recycling,” and accountability mechanisms.
GAIA Asia Pacific Coordinator Froilan Grate said:
This unprecedented report retraction is an opportunity to interrupt decades of waste colonialism. Ocean Conservancy is in a position to raise awareness among other organisations and policymakers about the false narrative propagated by the report.
The five Asian countries mentioned in the report are not to be blamed for plastic waste, said GAIA International Coordinator Christie Keith.
“That fault lies with the corporations that make and push out ever-increasing quantities of plastic,” said Keith.
OC’s report was drafted by McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm whose clientele includes some of the world’s top plastic polluters, claimed Satyarupa Shekhar. She is the Asia Pacific Coordinator of the #breakfreefromplastic movement.
“The report diluted existing restrictions on incineration and opened the doors to false solutions and controversial techno-fixes to deal with the plastic pollution crisis,” she said.
Some glaring examples of this can be seen in the Philippines, which has a national ban on incineration. New proposals to allow WTE incineration plants threaten the ban, Shekhar said.
In Indonesia, the government continues to push for waste incineration despite rulings by its Supreme Court against development of waste-based power plants or incinerators, she added.
The advocacy group acknowledged its mistake in focusing on plastic waste management, aside from retracting the report. It also reconsidered its position on WTE incineration and other similar technologies to deal with the burgeoning plastic waste crisis.
OC has also admitted its error in failing to look at the work of local communities and the subsequent effects of the report on them.
“We created a narrative about who is responsible for the ocean plastic pollution crisis — one that failed to acknowledge the outsized role that developed countries, especially the United States, have played and continue to play in generating and exporting plastic waste to this very region,” the group said in the July statement.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.