Environment

Battle to preserve nature resumes in Uttarakhand’s Raini village 48 years after Chipko

Following the dismissal of the petition in the high court, the residents of Raini village are now preparing to appeal to the Supreme Court, despite limited resources  

 
By Trilochan Bhatt
Published: Wednesday 28 July 2021
Reini village takes up the fight for nature again after 48 years. Photo: Atul

Residents of Uttarakhand’s Raini village, the birthplace of the Chipko Movement, have gathered again to fight against environmental degradation. Their plea in the Nainital High Court demanding rehabilitation, after floods caused widespread destruction and claimed several lives in February, got rejected. 

But the villagers, who earn their livelihoods through small-scale farming and animal husbandry, have not given up hope. 

The Gram Panchayat convened in the tribal hamlet last week and unanimously decided to move the Supreme Court against the high court order with their meagre hard-earned savings. 

This time, as it was 48 years ago during the Chipko Movement, the battle of Raini village is about saving the environment and its existence. 

The movement was started in 1973 by women like Gaura Devi, Bati Devi, Chandri Devi, Uma Devi, Rupsa Devi, Duka Devi, Chiladi Devi and Musi Devi. Now, their second and third generations are gearing up to continue the tradition. 


Read more about the Chipko Movement here

This time, the demand is to revoke the approval of hydroelectric projects that are wreaking havoc in the high Himalayan region and to relocate the residents of Raini to a safer location.

Raini is located on the banks of river Rishiganga that cuts through the village, with river Dhauliganga a short distance away. 

National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd (NTPC) operated the 13-megawatt Rishiganga Hydroelectric Project on Rishiganga. On February 7, 2021, a devastating deluge completely destroyed the power plant and flooded the lower part of the village. Officially, 206 people went missing and 88 bodies were recovered. Raini was no longer a safe place to live. 

Following the disaster, the villagers began to demand relocation, but no one paid heed. 

On June 17-18, the village was once again hit by floods, and this time, the lower part of the village was completely washed away. 

A few hundred metres of the Joshimath-Malari highway, a critical point of communication, was also impacted by the flooding. 

A road was dug out on a hill on the outskirts of the village. A statue of Gaura Devi, a small guest house and primary school were demolished to make way for the construction. The statue of Gaura Devi is now kept in the tehsil of Joshimath.

After the latest disaster, the people of Raini intensified the demand to settle them in a safer place. The village head, Bhawan Singh, gathered villagers in a meeting after the administration refused to take them seriously. They decided to move the Nainital High Court. The biggest hurdle, according to Singh, was money.

A petition was filed in the Nainital High Court on behalf of five people: Bhawan Singh, former Kshetra Panchayat member Sangram Singh, Gaura Devi's grandson Sohan Singh, a Congress leader and social worker from Joshimath Kamal Raturi, a social worker from Joshimath and secretary of the CPI (ML) state committee Atul Sati. The petition included four points: 

  1. The approval given by the Union forest and environment department to the Rishiganga Hydroelectric Project, which was completely destroyed on February 7th, and the Tapovan-Vishnugad project that was under construction at the time, be revoked because this approval has no meaning after the devastation of February 7.
  2. Both of the projects be shelved for the foreseeable future.
  3. The power companies be held accountable for the massive loss of lives in the February 7 disaster, and action taken against them as criminal negligence.
  4. Rehabilitation of Raini villagers be carried out in a safe location, and funds spent on displacement and rehabilitation be recovered from the project’s producing companies.

Dismissal of the petition

The petition raised serious issues but could not survive even a single day in court. On the first day, a two-judge bench, comprising Chief Justice of the high court Justice Raghavendra Singh Chouhan and Justice Alok Kumar Verma, not only dismissed the petition but also ordered all petitioners to pay a fine of Rs 10,000 each. 

In addition, the court refused to recognise the petitioners as social workers. The court also stated that the petitioners are “puppets of an invisible hand”.

One of the petitioners, Atul Sati, said they are baffled by the court's decision. They currently have only one option: Challenge the decision in the Supreme Court. 

Petitioner Atul Sati said that NTPC’s lawyer boasted about his victory in a press release by the company after the HC decision. 

The court refused to recognise him as a social worker without giving him the opportunity to prove it, he added. Sangram Singh, one of the petitioners, had previously filed a plea in the HC opposing the Rishiganga project but the bench made no mention of it.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.