Why people want to be poor

Crisis in Chhattisgarh over implementation of food security law has crucial lessons for India's public distribution system

By Richard Mahapatra
Last Updated: Sunday 07 June 2015

Crisis in Chhattisgarh over implementation of food security law has crucial lessons for India's public distribution system

imageThe unprecedented surge in below-poverty-line (BPL) families in Chhattisgarh has a lesson for India’s public distribution system (PDS). In its overdrive to implement its own food security law, the state has issued more ration cards than the total number of households. Political parties see it as a scandal, while it may be more than a simple case of fudging cards to access cheap foodgrains. The crisis has some fundamental messages for the country about to implement the National Food Security Act.

Chhattisgarh passed its food security law in December 2012, which provides for near-universal coverage of cheap foodgrains. A few months before this year’s general elections were declared, the state government embarked on a campaign to distribute ration cards in the second half of 2013. While the state has 5.6 million households, the government issued more than seven million ration cards. This also saw a rise in the number of BPL households in the state—within a month, BPL households doubled from 3.3 million in August 2013 to nearly 6.58 million in September. When the news made headlines, the government made over 1.4 million ration cards ineligible—the exact difference between the number of households and ration card holders.

Why was there such a surge in ration card registration? The law defines household as a family that has a common kitchen. Each household gets 35 kg of rice at Rs 2 per kg every month under PDS. Many joint families in Chhattisgarh gave a self-declaration that they were individual households with separate kitchen. This was easy to show—brothers in a family got a separate gas connection to show separate kitchens. Thus, overnight, a household turned into multiple households under the same roof.

Why would somebody do this? This is where the debate over who is eligible for cheap foodgrains and how it should be delivered comes into play. The price difference between PDS and open market foodgrains is huge. Everybody loves cheap food, particularly when food inflation is high.

Then there is the problem of inequality. For example, a joint family of 10 persons having a common kitchen will get 35 kg of foodgrains every month, so will a family comprising three or four members. While the quantity may suffice the latter, it is not enough for a large household, which suffers the most. At the same time, people prefer to avail food under PDS as prices are low and the law makes it an entitlement. So a joint family notionally splits to avail more foodgrains. This is not to suggest that there were no fraudulent cards taken by ineligible people. The big difference between the price of public and open market foodgrains makes it a lucrative commodity for black market.

The message from Chhattisgarh is critical as we expect a robust PDS to roll out the National Food Security Act. It is evident that making PDS universal may not render it corruption-free, as is evident from Chhattisgarh. In fact, we focus too much on corruption leaving aside other issues of importance. Inequality in a highly subsidised food system is going to be a much bigger challenge than the delivery mechanism. Similarly, the price difference will boost the black market. The problem will only get bigger. The lessons from Chhattisgarh must be institutionalised to ensure that the National Food Security Act does not derail before it starts.

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter :

Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.

  • There are other ways in which

    There are other ways in which people are gaming the system. For example people who run dosa, idli stalls get the rice from PDS at cheap rates not for their own consumption but of commercial uses, kind of using subsidized LPG in hotels. Then there is secondary market selling where people take the PDS rice and sell it to normal kirana shops who just put it or mix it with expensive rice and sell it to non BPL people at market rates. Frankly India is not a poor country, it is just poor on paper and is shown to be poor so that certain sections of the society can live off the rest of the working class. This will eventually lead to massive social unrest and eventually our society will collapse, anyways the social fabric is in tethers.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply
  • The key element in this

    The key element in this enactment has been rightly pointed out as the huge difference between PDS and open market price. Did the state government do anything to monitor and control the open market price. Surely precious little will be the overwhelming response given the political economy surrounding the food security issues. However it is not true that people want to stay poor. It is the illusion created by the colluding market players involved in the sordid drama.

    Posted by: Anonymous | 6 years ago | Reply