Other local associations can also manage watersheds effectively
Why only panchayats?
The government of India has for long considered watersheds as catalysts for development activities in rain-fed areas. In 1994, it developed guidelines for implementation of watershed programmes. These were subsequently revised, in 2001, by the department of land resources of the ministry of rural development and circulated as guidelines for watershed development (gwd).
gwd aimed to bring local communities to the center stage and push the administration towards a facilitating role. It proposed a user-friendly organisational structure with watershed associations (was) and elected/nominated watershed committees undertaking field/village-level implementation of each watershed. This was to be done under the supervision of a project implementation authority (pia). Each pia had to manage 10-12 watersheds with technical inputs from experts. A district watershed committee was assigned the task of preparing detailed action plans for watershed projects.
gwd focussed on enhancing the quality of rural livelihood support systems; special attention was given to poverty alleviation and village communities were encouraged to use simple and affordable technological solutions.
Panchayati raj institutions (pris) were assigned the task of reviewing the implementation of these programmes. However, they had to adhere to gwd norms to become a pia. They also had to compete with other community-based organisations (cbos), non-governmental organisations (ngos) and government organisations (gos) to get selected as an implementing authority.
The aim of the Haryali programme is evidently to strengthen pris. But in this author's view these institutions are not the sole representatives of local communities. Moreover, they function in a manner very different from watershed user groups. Experience has shown that panchayat bodies have not always been efficient watershed managers largely because they are territorial units and not ecological entities. In places where the watershed area is coterminous with the gram panchayat (gp), pris have done well. However, if a gp has several watersheds, then each watershed area should have its own wa. This of course depends on the resources available to the concerned people.
It also makes no sense to let the capacities of cbos, ngos, gos and other agencies, that have been built up over time, go waste. Retaining their services is not just a matter of economic prudence. It will also enable effective watershed management.
pris are the third tier of Indian federalism. Watershed bodies working parallel to, or at levels lower than, panchayat bodies are part of a fourth tier whose importance is gradually being understood. Both tiers can co-exist and reinforce each other.
Rakshat Hooja is a research scholar at the Centre for Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.