Despite several clinical trials on animals, only one approved drug can treat the infected
The ice bucket challenge that saw celebrities pouring ice and water over themselves and US president Barack Obama reach for his wallet to make a donation was started by the ALS Association in the US to raise awareness about the disease. The initiative is also aimed at collecting donations that can be used to eradicate amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) that affects nearly 30,000 US citizens.
The challenge dares nominated participants to be filmed while a bucket of ice-cold water is being poured on them or donate $100 to the association. The person posting the video tags others and they have to dare to do the same.
Although pouring ice or ice-cold water on one's body has nothing to do with treatment of ALS, the videos of celebrities taking up the challenge, posted on social media, have created a buzz about the three-week event. In India, Bollywood celebrities like Sonakshi Sinha, Akshay Kumar, Riteish Deshmukh, Sunny Leone, Sidharth Malhotra and Bipasha Basu joined the race.
Despite all the videos going viral and many talking about it, the mystery around ALS remains; not many know what the disease is all about.
Unfortunately, the magnitude of ALS is not completely understood. At present, only one US FDA approved drug, riluzole, modestly slows the progression of ALS. A few other drugs are under clinical trials.
While most of the celebrities in the US have joined the ice bucket challenge, Canadian-American actor Pamela Anderson has a different take. She posted on Facebook that she cannot support the challenge because the drugs are first tried on animals, for which they are put through cruel tests.
"In recent experiments funded by the ALS Association, mice had holes drilled into their skulls, were inflicted with crippling illnesses, and were forced to run on an inclined treadmill until they collapsed from exhaustion. Monkeys had chemicals injected into their brains and backs and were later killed and dissected,” wrote the star actor.
“What is the result of these experiments (other than a lot of suffering)? In the past decade, only about a dozen experimental ALS treatments have moved on to human trials after being shown to alleviate the disease in animals. All but one of these treatments failed in humans—and the one that “passed” offers only marginal benefits to humans who suffer from ALS," she added in her post.
We are a voice to you; you have been a support to us. Together we build journalism that is independent, credible and fearless. You can further help us by making a donation. This will mean a lot for our ability to bring you news, perspectives and analysis from the ground so that we can make change together.
Comments are moderated and will be published only after the site moderator’s approval. Please use a genuine email ID and provide your name. Selected comments may also be used in the ‘Letters’ section of the Down To Earth print edition.